World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5804
World Ranking
9394
National Ranking
3981

Hugh Svendsen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh Svendsen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 108 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hugh Svendsen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh Svendsen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Computer network
  • World Wide Web

Hugh Svendsen focuses on World Wide Web, Multimedia, Service, Metadata and Presentation. World Wide Web connects with themes related to Order in his study. His Multimedia research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Aggregate, Process and User device.

His research integrates issues of Node and Information retrieval in his study of Metadata. His work deals with themes such as Data element, Database catalog, Meta Data Services, Database and Client, which intersect with Information retrieval. His Presentation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Download and Electronic media.

His most cited work include:

  • Network-based photosharing architecture (201 citations)
  • P2P network for providing real time media recommendations (183 citations)
  • System and method for storing and accessing images based on position data associated therewith (145 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are World Wide Web, Multimedia, Information retrieval, Service and Identifier. Hugh Svendsen combines subjects such as Aggregate and Service with his study of World Wide Web. His work deals with themes such as Graphical user interface, User device and User profile, which intersect with Multimedia.

His work in the fields of Recommender system overlaps with other areas such as Geography. His study in Identifier is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Annotation, Order, Executable and Login. His work in Metadata tackles topics such as Database which are related to areas like Upload.

He most often published in these fields:

  • World Wide Web (48.54%)
  • Multimedia (44.66%)
  • Information retrieval (13.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2016)?

  • Multimedia (44.66%)
  • World Wide Web (48.54%)
  • Information retrieval (13.59%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Multimedia, World Wide Web, Information retrieval, Similarity and Service are his primary areas of study. He interconnects Process, User device and Database in the investigation of issues within Multimedia. His World Wide Web study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Aggregate.

His study in the fields of Recommender system under the domain of Information retrieval overlaps with other disciplines such as Preference, Value and Set. In Service, he works on issues like User profile, which are connected to User agent. His Electronic media research incorporates themes from Wireless and Social media.

Between 2010 and 2016, his most popular works were:

  • System and method for automated proximity-based social check-ins (142 citations)
  • Automatic check-ins and status updates (127 citations)
  • System and method for obtaining media content for a portable media player (80 citations)

Best Publications

  • User generated ADS based on check-ins

    Hugh Svendsen;John Forese;Christopher M. Amidon;Kunal Kandekar

  • P2P network for providing real time media recommendations

    Hugh Svendsen

  • Network-based photosharing architecture

    Hugh Svendsen;Robert Paul Morris

  • Method, system, and computer readable medium for graphically displaying related text in an electronic document

    Kunal Kandekar;Scott Curtis;Hugh Svendsen

  • System and method for automated proximity-based social check-ins

    Kunal Kandekar Kandekar;Hugh Svendsen;Eugene Matthew Farrelly

  • Automatic check-ins and status updates

    Scott Curtis;Hugh Svendsen;Michael W. Helpingstine;Christopher M. Amidon

  • P2p real time media recommendations

    Hugh Svendsen

  • System and method for storing and accessing images based on position data associated therewith

    Hugh Svendsen

  • Method and system for reviewing and navigating among images on an image capture unit

    Eric C. Anderson;Hugh Blake Svendsen

  • Method and system for distributing affiliate images in a peer-to-peer (p2p) photosharing network through affiliate branding

    Hugh B. Svendsen;Rick Thompson

  • Auto-editing process for media content shared via a media sharing service

    Ravi Reddy Katpelly;Richard J. Walsh;Hugh Svendsen;Scott Curtis

  • Method and system for generating media recommendations in a distributed environment based on tagging play history information with location information

    Hugh Svendsen;Eugene Matthew Farrelly

  • Automatic organization of images uploaded to a photo-sharing site

    Patricia Scardino;Robert Paul Morris;Hugh Blake Svendsen

  • Method and system for aggregating media collections between participants of a sharing network

    Hugh Svendsen;Harold Sutherland;Gary W. Black

  • System And Method For Identifying Music Content In A P2P Real Time Recommendation Network

    Hugh B. Svendsen;Michael Erickson

  • Matching participants in a p2p recommendation network loosely coupled to a subscription service

    Hugh Svendsen;Michael T. Hoffman

  • Specifying, assigning, and maintaining user defined metadata in a network-based photosharing system

    Robert Paul Morris;Hugh Svendsen;Patricia Scardino

  • Automated discovery, assignment, and submission of image metadata to a network-based photosharing service

    Hugh Svendsen;Patricia Scardino

  • System and method for obtaining media content for a portable media player

    Hugh Svendsen

  • Network-based photosharing architecture for search and delivery of private images and metadata

    Robert Paul Morris;Hugh Svendsen;Patricia Scardino

  • Method and system for providing web browsing through a firewall in a peer to peer network

    Hugh B. Svendsen;Al Issa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in computer science opens doors to a variety of online education pathways. For those seeking a swift entry into the tech industry, consider pursuing easy certifications to get online. These certifications focus on in-demand skills and can boost your resume without requiring years of study.

If you already have a foundational degree, the quickest online masters degree programs allow professionals to upskill rapidly. These accelerated programs are ideal for working professionals in computer science eager to advance their knowledge and career without pausing their jobs.

Demand for advanced expertise is strong. Many tech professionals choose one of the most in demand masters degrees to remain competitive and access higher-paying, specialized roles in the field.

Finally, for students looking for a flexible and cost-effective start, online associates programs in computer science provide essential training and a solid stepping stone toward further study or entry-level tech jobs.

Best Scientists Citing Hugh Svendsen

Trending Scientists