World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
21057
World Ranking
2859
National Ranking
32

Andreas Ibrom publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Ibrom sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 236 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andreas Ibrom D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Ibrom sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Ibrom is affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with 88 publications in the field. Within this broad area, their work extensively covers subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's research topics include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Management, Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows, Tree-ring Climate Responses, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, and Climate Variability and Models.

Their recent papers demonstrate ongoing contributions to environmental science and ecosystem function. Notable publications include:

  • The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function, 2021, Nature
  • Forest production efficiency increases with growth temperature, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Environment-sensitivity functions for gross primary productivity in light use efficiency models, 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Uncovering the critical soil moisture thresholds of plant water stress for European ecosystems, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Effects of drought and meteorological forcing on carbon and water fluxes in Nordic forests during the dry summer of 2018, 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Biogeosciences, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Waste Management.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Ivan Mammarella
  • Leonardo Montagnani
  • Gioṙgio Matteucci
  • Matthias Cuntz
  • Nina Buchmann

This collaboration network reflects cross-disciplinary engagement within environmental and ecological research fields, supporting a wide range of studies on ecosystem dynamics, carbon cycling, and atmospheric processes.

Best Publications

  • Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites

    Kell Wilson;Allen Goldstein;Eva Falge;Marc Aubinet

  • Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology

    Marc Aubinet;Achim Grelle;Andreas Ibrom;Üllar Rannik

  • Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests

    R. Valentini;G. Matteucci;A. J. Dolman;E.-D. Schulze

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests

    I. A. Janssens;H. Lankreijer;G. Matteucci;A. S. Kowalski

  • Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts

    Dorothe A. Frank;Markus Reichstein;Michael Bahn;Kirsten Thonicke

  • A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: The role of landscape-scale heterogeneity

    Paul C. Stoy;Matthias Mauder;Thomas Foken;Barbara Marcolla

  • Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance

    Reimo Kindler;Reimo Kindler;Jan Siemens;Jan Siemens;Klaus Kaiser;David Christopher Walmsley

  • Partitioning European grassland net ecosystem CO2 exchange into gross primary productivity and ecosystem respiration using light response function analysis

    T. G. Gilmanov;J. F. Soussana;L. Aires;V. Allard

  • Reduced N cycling in response to elevated CO2, warming, and drought in a Danish heathland: Synthesizing results of the CLIMAITE project after two years of treatments

    Klaus Steenberg Larsen;Louise C. Andresen;Claus Beier;Sven Jonasson

  • Strong low-pass filtering effects on water vapour flux measurements with closed-path eddy correlation systems

    Andreas Ibrom;Ebba Dellwik;Henrik K. Flyvbjerg;Niels Otto Jensen

  • The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function

    Mirco Migliavacca;Talie Musavi;Miguel D. Mahecha;Jacob A. Nelson

  • Nitrogen processes in terrestrial ecosystems

    Klaus Butterbach-Bahl;Per Gundersen;Per Ambus;Jürgen Augustin

  • Above‐ground woody carbon sequestration measured from tree rings is coherent with net ecosystem productivity at five eddy‐covariance sites

    Flurin Babst;Olivier Bouriaud;Dario Papale;Bert Gielen

  • Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines

    Gerardo Fratini;Andreas Ibrom;Nicola Arriga;George Burba

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Increasing net CO2 uptake by a Danish beech forest during the period from 1996 to 2009

    Kim Pilegaard;Andreas Ibrom;Michael S. Courtney;Poul Hummelshøj

  • Experimental design of multifactor climate change experiments with elevated CO2, warming and drought: the CLIMAITE project

    Teis Nørgaard Mikkelsen;Claus Beier;S. Jonasson;M. Holmstrup

  • Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites

    L. Wingate;J. Ogée;E. Cremonese;G. Filippa

  • On the use of the Webb–Pearman–Leuning theory for closed-path eddy correlation measurements

    Andreas Ibrom;Ebba Dellwik;Søren Ejling Larsen;Kim Pilegaard

  • ICOS eddy covariance flux-station site setup: a review

    Corinna Rebmann;Marc Aubinet;Hape Schmid;Nicola Arriga

  • Eddy covariance raw data processing for CO2 and energy fluxes calculation at ICOS ecosystem stations

    Simone Sabbatini;Ivan Mammarella;Nicola Arriga;Gerardo Fratini

Frequent Co-Authors

Kim Pilegaard
Kim Pilegaard Technical University of Denmark
Klaus Steenberg Larsen
Klaus Steenberg Larsen University of Copenhagen
Claus Beier
Claus Beier University of Copenhagen
Leonardo Montagnani
Leonardo Montagnani Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Per Ambus
Per Ambus University of Copenhagen
Alexander Knohl
Alexander Knohl University of Göttingen
Ivan Mammarella
Ivan Mammarella University of Helsinki
Georg Wohlfahrt
Georg Wohlfahrt University of Innsbruck
Corinna Rebmann
Corinna Rebmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA can lead to diverse career paths, and many students supplement their education with related online degrees. For those aiming at advanced expertise, online doctoral programs without dissertation provide flexible options to achieve terminal degrees without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Educators and professionals looking to transition from a master's to a doctoral level may find eds to edd bridge program paths particularly beneficial, enabling them to enhance their leadership and research skills while continuing to work.

For those interested in community engagement or policy related to environmental issues, online advanced degrees like the online dsw programs in social work offer affordable routes to expand your impact through social work frameworks.

Lastly, students seeking broad foundational knowledge or career flexibility often consider an online general studies degree affordable programs, which allow customization across disciplines, including environmental topics, making them ideal for evolving career interests.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Ibrom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles