World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
4980
World Ranking
11327
National Ranking
4671

Jeremy Birnholtz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Birnholtz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 101 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeremy Birnholtz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremy Birnholtz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeremy Birnholtz is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work centers on key topics including Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology; LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy; Gender, Feminism, and Media; Privacy, Security, and Data Protection; HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions; Media Influence and Health; and Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • "Layers of Marginality: An Exploration of Visibility, Impressions, and Cultural Context on Geospatial Apps for Men Who Have Sex With Men in Mumbai, India" (2020, Social Media + Society)
  • ""I don't want to be known for that:"The role of temporality in online self-presentation of young gay and bisexual males" (2021, Computers in Human Behavior)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Kathryn Macapagal
  • David Moskowitz
  • Ashley Kraus
  • Annika Pinch
  • Shruta Rawat

Their research has been published predominantly in venues such as Social Media + Society, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Computers in Human Behavior, and Sexuality Research and Social Policy.

These publications indicate a sustained contribution to interdisciplinary studies involving social and behavioral dimensions of sexuality, privacy, digital technology use, and identity, with particular attention to minority populations.

Best Publications

  • Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app

    Courtney K. Blackwell;Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Charles Abbott

  • Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Matthew J. Bietz

  • "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media

    Michael A. DeVito;Darren Gergle;Jeremy Birnholtz

  • How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation

    Michael A. DeVito;Jeremy Birnholtz;Jeffery T. Hancock;Megan French

  • Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media

    Michael A. DeVito;Jeremy Birnholtz;Jeffery T. Hancock

  • What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz

  • 'Too Gay for Facebook': Presenting LGBTQ+ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem

    Michael A. DeVito;Ashley Marie Walker;Jeremy Birnholtz

  • Identity, identification and identifiability: the language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app

    Jeremy Birnholtz;Colin Fitzpatrick;Mark Handel;Jed R. Brubaker

  • The effects of cash, electronic, and paper gift certificates as respondent incentives for a web-based survey of technologically sophisticated respondents

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Daniel B. Horn;Thomas A. Finholt;Sung Joo Bae

  • Awkward encounters of an "other" kind: collective self-presentation and face threat on facebook

    Eden Litt;Erin Spottswood;Jeremy Birnholtz;Jeff T. Hancock

  • Butler lies: awareness, deception and design

    Jeff Hancock;Jeremy Birnholtz;Natalya Bazarova;Jamie Guillory

  • Six degrees of jonathan grudin: a social network analysis of the evolution and impact of CSCW research

    Daniel B. Horn;Thomas A. Finholt;Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Dheeraj Motwani

  • Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups

    Gilly Leshed;Diego Perez;Jeffrey T. Hancock;Dan Cosley

  • Adopt, adapt, abandon: Understanding why some young adults start, and then stop, using instant messaging

    Jeremy Birnholtz

  • When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz

  • Tracking changes in collaborative writing: edits, visibility and group maintenance

    Jeremy Birnholtz;Steven Ibara

  • An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Tovi Grossman;Clarissa Mak;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • "Is it Weird to Still Be a Virgin": Anonymous, Locally Targeted Questions on Facebook Confession Boards

    Jeremy Birnholtz;Nicholas Aaron Ross Merola;Arindam Paul

  • Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place

    Jeremy Birnholtz;McKenzie Jones-Rounds

  • Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Thomas A. Finholt;Daniel B. Horn;Sung Joo Bae

  • Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open-plan offices

    Jeremy P. Birnholtz;Carl Gutwin;Kirstie Hawkey

  • "I Don't Want Them to Not Know": Investigating Decisions to Disclose Transgender Identity on Dating Platforms

    Julia R. Fernandez;Jeremy Birnholtz

  • Everyday deception or a few prolific liars? The prevalence of lies in text messaging

    Madeline E. Smith;Jeffrey T. Hancock;Lindsay Reynolds;Jeremy Birnholtz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey T. Hancock
Jeffrey T. Hancock Stanford University
Ronald M. Baecker
Ronald M. Baecker University of Toronto
Kathryn Macapagal
Kathryn Macapagal Northwestern University
Ravin Balakrishnan
Ravin Balakrishnan University of Toronto
Carl Gutwin
Carl Gutwin University of Saskatchewan
Susan R. Fussell
Susan R. Fussell Cornell University
Michael X Cohen
Michael X Cohen Radboud University
Darren Gergle
Darren Gergle Northwestern University
Ian Foster
Ian Foster University of Chicago
Nicole B. Ellison
Nicole B. Ellison University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring cheap online colleges is a smart way to earn your Computer Science degree without breaking the bank. Many students are also searching for flexible entry points; fortunately, there are excellent online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, making higher education more accessible.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, a computer science accelerated program can help you earn your degree fast and jumpstart your tech career. Graduates aren’t limited to software development—Computer Science skills are in high demand across multiple fields.

Diverse opportunities are available even for those with multidisciplinary backgrounds. For example, there are various jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree paths, showcasing how STEM knowledge can complement a range of careers.

No matter your academic or professional starting point, online Computer Science programs in the USA offer affordable, flexible, and accelerated pathways to a rewarding tech future.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremy Birnholtz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles