World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
12255
World Ranking
5800
National Ranking
2635

Susan R. Fussell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan R. Fussell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Susan R. Fussell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan R. Fussell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susan R. Fussell is a researcher affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their work spans multiple areas within computer science and social sciences, emphasizing interactions between technology and human behavior.

Their research primarily covers the following main fields of study:

  • Computer Science
  • Social Sciences

Within these domains, their work extends into several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Information Systems
  • Language and Linguistics

Susan R. Fussell's research topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach with a particular focus on:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Their publication record includes papers appearing predominantly in "Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction" and also in "arXiv (Cornell University)." Notable recent publications include:

  • "It's Great to Exercise Together on Zoom!": Understanding the Practices and Challenges of Live Stream Group Fitness Classes (2022), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Dissemination, Situated Fact-checking, and Social Effects of Misinformation among Rural Bangladeshi Villagers During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Bridging Fluency Disparity between Native and Nonnative Speakers in Multilingual Multiparty Collaboration Using a Clarification Agent (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Improving Non-Native Speakers' Participation with an Automatic Agent in Multilingual Groups (2022), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • More Than a Click (2020), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Wen Duan
  • Naomi Yamashita
  • Y. Shirai
  • Xiaoyan Li
  • Xinhe Tian

Best Publications

  • Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work.

    Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell;Susan E. Brennan;Jane Siegel

  • Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know.

    Susan R. Fussell;Robert M. Krauss

  • Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks

    Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell;Jane Siegel

  • Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference

    Robert M. Krauss;Susan R. Fussell

  • Coordination of communication: effects of shared visual context on collaborative work

    Susan R. Fussell;Robert E. Kraut;Jane Siegel

  • Mutual knowledge and communicative effectiveness

    Robert M. Krauss;Susan R. Fussell

  • Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent

    Sara Kiesler;Susan R. Fussell;Cristen Torrey

  • Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks

    Susan R. Fussell;Leslie D. Setlock;Jie Yang;Jiazhi Ou

  • Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot

    Aaron Powers;Sara Kiesler;Susan Fussell;Cristen Torrey

  • The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework

    Susan R. Fussell;Robert M. Krauss

  • Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks

    Susan R. Fussell;Leslie D. Setlock;Robert E. Kraut

  • The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence

    Robert E. Kraut;Darren Gergle;Susan R. Fussell

  • Understanding email use: predicting action on a message

    Laura A. Dabbish;Robert E. Kraut;Susan Fussell;Sara Kiesler

  • Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies

    Susan R. Fussell;Robert E. Kraut;F. Javier Lerch;William L. Scherlis

  • Leveraging Social Networks To Motivate Individuals to Reduce their Ecological Footprints

    J. Mankoff;D. Matthews;S.R. Fussell;M. Johnson

  • Environmental sustainability and interaction

    Jennifer C. Mankoff;Eli Blevis;Alan Borning;Batya Friedman

  • Work coordination, workflow, and workarounds in a medical context

    Marina Kobayashi;Susan R. Fussell;Yan Xiao;F. Jacob Seagull

  • Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging

    Leslie D. Setlock;Susan R. Fussell;Christine Neuwirth

  • Using Visual Information for Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Language Efficiency and Visual Technology Minimizing Collaborative Effort with Visual Information

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Multiple Group Coordination in Complex and Dynamic Task Environments: Interruptions, Coping Mechanisms, and Technology Recommendations

    Yuqing Ren;Sara Kiesler;Susan Fussell

  • Action as language in a shared visual space

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Cultural differences in the use of instant messaging in Asia and North America

    Shipra Kayan;Susan R. Fussell;Leslie D. Setlock

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Computer Science degree opens doors to a wide array of careers, but it’s not the only tech-related field with strong prospects. If you’re interested in sustainability and the environment, you might want to explore what can you do with an environmental science degree. This field offers roles in research, policy, consulting, and more.

For those seeking flexibility, accredited computer science degree online programs allow you to study from home and accelerate your career. Online learning is also making fields like environmental and mechanical engineering more accessible. Check out the cheapest online environmental science degree options and discover pathways that balance cost, convenience, and career results.

For students interested in engineering, there are many affordable avenues as well. Explore options such as the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online to enter growing industries with strong job demand.

Whether you choose computer science, environmental studies, or engineering, online degrees expand your career options and offer pathways to impactful, in-demand roles.

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles