World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8903 8314 898 858 128 5750

Sharon Leal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sharon Leal between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sharon Leal published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2018. 12 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2018. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 3 publications
2006 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sharon Leal: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 0
2008 5
2009 4
2010 6
2011 6
2012 7
2013 5
2014 5
2015 5
2016 8
2017 9
2018 15
2019 8
2020 14
2021 5
2022 8
2023 9
2024 9
2025 3
Total 133
Download as CSV

Sharon Leal publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Leal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 128
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sharon Leal D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon Leal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sharon Leal is affiliated with the University of Portsmouth in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans psychology, neuroscience, and social sciences, with a total of 60 publications in psychology, 24 in neuroscience, and 22 in social sciences. Subfields within these areas include social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, with an emphasis on deception detection and forensic psychology. Other key topics include memory processes and influences, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending, misinformation and its impacts, adversarial robustness in machine learning, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and social and intergroup psychology.

Their frequent collaborators include Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb, Ronald P. Fisher, Samantha Mann, and Jennifer Burkhardt. The collaborative nature of their work is evident from repeated partnerships with these researchers across numerous publications.

Sharon Leal has contributed to a variety of publication venues, with the most publications appearing in The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. Other common venues are Applied Cognitive Psychology, Acta Psychologica, Psychiatry Psychology and Law, and Legal and Criminological Psychology.

Selected recent papers authored by Sharon Leal include:

  • The Relationship between Complications, Common Knowledge Details and Self-handicapping Strategies and Veracity: A Meta-analysis, 2021, The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
  • How researchers can make verbal lie detection more attractive for practitioners, 2022, Psychiatry Psychology and Law
  • Combining Verbal Veracity Assessment Techniques to Distinguish Truth Tellers from Lie Tellers, 2020, The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
  • Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future, 2022, Brain Sciences
  • Plausibility: A Verbal Cue to Veracity worth Examining?, 2020, The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context

Best Publications

  • Increasing Cognitive Load to Facilitate Lie Detection: The Benefit of Recalling an Event in Reverse Order

    Aldert Vrij;Samantha A. Mann;Ronald P. Fisher;Sharon Leal

  • Outsmarting the Liars: Toward a Cognitive Lie Detection Approach

    Aldert Vrij;Pär Anders Granhag;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal

  • Outsmarting the Liars: The Benefit of Asking Unanticipated Questions

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Pär Anders Granhag;Samantha Mann

  • Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load

    Aldert Vrij;Ronald Fisher;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal

  • A cognitive load approach to lie detection

    Aldert Vrij;Ronald Fisher;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal

  • You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls

    Sharon Leal;Aldert Vrij;Lara Warmelink;Zarah Vernham

  • ‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection?

    Aldert Vrij;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal;Ronald Fisher

  • Blinking During and After Lying

    Sharon Leal;Aldert Vrij

  • Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: inducing the reverse order technique naturally

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Mann;Ronald Fisher

  • Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports.

    Lara Warmelink;Aldert Vrij;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal

  • Windows to the Soul? Deliberate Eye Contact as a Cue to Deceit

    Samantha Mann;Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Pär Anders Granhag

  • A comparison between lying about intentions and past activities: verbal cues and detection accuracy

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Ann Mann;Pär Anders Granhag

  • Using sketch drawing to induce inconsistency in liars

    Drew Leins;Ronald P. Fisher;Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal

  • Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Mann;Lara Warmelink

  • Using the Model Statement to Elicit Information and Cues to Deceit from Native Speakers, Non‐native Speakers and Those Talking Through an Interpreter

    Sarah Ewens;Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Mann

  • Translating theory into practice: Evaluating a cognitive lie detection training workshop

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Mann;Zarah Vernham

  • Lying about flying: the first experiment to detect false intent

    Aldert Vrij;Pär A. Granhag;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal

  • Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews

    Aldert Vrij;Sharon Leal;Samantha Mann;Gary Dalton

  • Two heads are better than one? how to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception

    Samantha Mann;Aldert Vrij;Dominic J. Shaw;Sharon Leal

  • Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: An examination of their strategies

    Aldert Vrij;Samantha Mann;Sharon Leal;Pär Anders Granhag

  • Collective interviewing of suspects

    Aldert Vrij;Shyma Jundi;Lorraine Hope;Jackie Hillman

Frequent Co-Authors

Aldert Vrij
Aldert Vrij University of Portsmouth
Samantha Mann
Samantha Mann University of Portsmouth
Ronald P. Fisher
Ronald P. Fisher Florida International University
Pär Anders Granhag
Pär Anders Granhag University of Gothenburg
Lorraine Hope
Lorraine Hope University of Portsmouth
Rebecca Milne
Rebecca Milne University of Portsmouth
Ray Bull
Ray Bull University of Derby
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Matthias Gamer
Matthias Gamer University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens up a wide range of career pathways, including roles in counseling, mental health, education, and research. Many students are interested in fast-tracking their education to enter the workforce sooner, especially in states with unique requirements and opportunities for mental health professionals.

If becoming a counselor is your goal, several states offer accelerated programs to help you get licensed more quickly. For example, you can learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Missouri, or explore shortest path to becoming a counselor in Nebraska. Those interested in flexible and intensive learning options may want to research Montana accelerated counseling programs or check out the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Nevada.

Consider each state's licensure process, required degree level, and internship hours when planning your education and career journey. Online programs can offer the flexibility needed to balance work, life, and study as you advance toward your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Sharon Leal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles