World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
12323
World Ranking
4557
National Ranking
302

Stephen Porter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Porter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen Porter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Porter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen Porter is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their academic profile is characterized mainly by their institutional connection rather than detailed publication records or research outputs.

There are no listed recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Stephen Porter. Similarly, no specific fields, subfields, or main topics of study have been identified from the available data.

Details regarding book publications or awards are also not present in the provided information. Consequently, there is limited public data describing the breadth or focus of their research contributions.

This profile reflects the current available information and does not report on specific research projects, collaborations, or recognition that Stephen Porter may have achieved beyond their primary affiliation.

Best Publications

  • In cold blood: characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy.

    Michael Woodworth;Stephen Porter

  • Pitfalls and Opportunities in Nonverbal and Verbal Lie Detection

    Aldert Vrij;Pär Anders Granhag;Stephen Porter

  • Reading Between the Lies Identifying Concealed and Falsified Emotions in Universal Facial Expressions

    Stephen Porter;Leanne ten Brinke

  • The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: implications for the recovered memory debate.

    Stephen Porter;John C. Yuille;Darrin R. Lehman

  • Profiles of Psychopathy in Incarcerated Sexual Offenders

    Stephen Porter;David Fairweather;Jeff Drugge;Hugues Hervé

  • Without conscience or without active conscience? The etiology of psychopathy revisited

    Stephen Porter

  • Psychopathy and Aggression.

    Stephen Porter;Michael Woodworth

  • Characteristics of sexual homicides committed by psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders.

    Stephen Porter;Michael Woodworth;Jeff Earle;Jeff Drugge

  • The Language of Deceit: An Investigation of the Verbal Clues to Deception in the Interrogation Context

    Stephen Porter;John C. Yuille

  • The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception?

    Stephen Porter;Leanne ten Brinke

  • Is traumatic memory special ? A comparison of traumatic memory characteristics with memory for other emotional life experiences

    Stephen Porter;Angela R. Birt

  • Psychopathic traits in adolescent offenders: an evaluation of criminal history, clinical, and psychosocial correlates.

    Mary Ann Campbell;Stephen Porter;Darcy Santor

  • Investigation of the criminal and conditional release profiles of Canadian federal offenders as a function of psychopathy and age.

    Stephen Porter;Angela R. Birt;Douglas P. Boer

  • Constructing Rich False Memories of Committing Crime

    Julia Shaw;Stephen Porter

  • Truth, Lies, and Videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception.

    Stephen Porter;Mike Woodworth;Angela R. Birt

  • Secrets and Lies: Involuntary Leakage in Deceptive Facial Expressions as a Function of Emotional Intensity

    Stephen Porter;Leanne ten Brinke;Brendan Wallace

  • Dangerous decisions: the impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability

    Stephen Porter;Leanne ten Brinke;Chantal Gustaw

  • Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 (ST131) Subclone H30 as an Emergent Multidrug-Resistant Pathogen Among US Veterans

    Aylin Colpan;Brian Johnston;Brian Johnston;Stephen Porter;Connie Clabots

  • Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders

    Stephen Porter;Leanne ten Brinke;Kevin Wilson

  • Cry me a river: identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception.

    Leanne ten Brinke;Stephen Porter

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Johnson
James R. Johnson University of Minnesota
Paul Thuras
Paul Thuras University of Minnesota
John C. Yuille
John C. Yuille University of British Columbia
Brian D. Johnston
Brian D. Johnston University of Minnesota
Connie Clabots
Connie Clabots VA Midwest Health Care Network
Mariana Castanheira
Mariana Castanheira JMI Laboratories
Rafael Cantón
Rafael Cantón Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria
Darrin R. Lehman
Darrin R. Lehman University of British Columbia
Christopher J. Patrick
Christopher J. Patrick Florida State University
Raymond M. Klein
Raymond M. Klein Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees unlocks a variety of rewarding career pathways. One increasingly popular specialization is in applied behavior analysis, which leads to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The journey to this role requires relevant education, supervised experience, and national certification.

Each state and city may have unique steps to follow to achieve BCBA status. For example, if you’re interested in local requirements, check out the Fort Wayne bcba education requirements or learn about how to become a bcba in Fort Worth. These guides outline essential degree programs and supervised hours needed.

The path often starts with an accredited psychology or related program, followed by specialized training. You might explore the Fremont bcba education requirements or understand exactly how to become a bcba in Fresno. Researching regional differences ensures your chosen program aligns with professional goals and state licensing boards.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Porter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles