World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
29939
World Ranking
5082
National Ranking
340

Darrin R. Lehman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darrin R. Lehman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Darrin R. Lehman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darrin R. Lehman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Darrin R. Lehman is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their academic profile reflects a focus centered around their institutional association without specific details on recent publications or research topics publicly available.

Though no recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues have been listed, the association with a major research university indicates engagement with scholarly activities typical of such an institution.

There are no specific recorded book publications or awards linked to Darrin R. Lehman that are presently documented. Similarly, detailed fields of study, subfields, or main topics pursued by this researcher are not provided in the available data.

The absence of further bibliometric or topical information restricts a deeper analysis of research impacts or thematic concentrations.

Best Publications

  • Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?

    Steven J. Heine;Darrin R. Lehman;Hazel Rose Markus;Shinobu Kitayama

  • Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries.

    Jennifer D. Campbell;Paul D. Trapnell;Steven J. Heine;Ilana M. Katz

  • Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice

    Barry Schwartz;Andrew Ward;John Monterosso;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • Resilience to Loss and Chronic Grief: A Prospective Study From Preloss to 18-Months Postloss

    George A. Bonanno;Camille B. Wortman;Darrin R. Lehman;Roger G. Tweed

  • What's Wrong With Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Subjective Likert Scales?: The Reference-Group Effect

    Steven J. Heine;Darrin R. Lehman;Kaiping Peng;Joe Greenholtz

  • Divergent consequences of success and failure in japan and north america: an investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves.

    Steven J. Heine;Shinobu Kitayama;Darrin R. Lehman;Toshitake Takata

  • Learning considered within a cultural context. Confucian and Socratic approaches.

    Roger G. Tweed;Darrin R. Lehman

  • Social support for the bereaved: Recipients' and providers' perspectives on what is helpful.

    Darrin R. Lehman;John H. Ellard;Camille B. Wortman

  • Long-term effects of losing a spouse or child in a motor vehicle crash

    Darrin R. Lehman;Camille B. Wortman;Allan F. Williams

  • Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East?

    Steven J. Heine;Darrin R. Lehman

  • Psychology and Culture

    Darrin R. Lehman;Chi-yue Chiu;Mark Schaller

  • SEARCHING FOR MEANING IN LOSS: ARE CLINICAL ASSUMPTIONS CORRECT?

    Christopher G. Davis;Camille B. Wortman;Darrin R. Lehman;Roxane Cohen Silver

  • Culture, Dissonance, and Self-Affirmation

    Steven J. Heine;Darrin R. Lehman

  • Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action?

    Lawrence J. Axelrod;Darrin R. Lehman

  • The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping.

    James C. Coyne;Camille B. Wortman;Darrin R. Lehman

  • The cultural construction of self-enhancement : An examination of group-serving biases

    Steven J. Heine;Darrin R. Lehman

  • The Effects of Graduate Training on Reasoning: Formal Discipline and Thinking About Everyday-Life Events

    Darrin R. Lehman;Richard O. Lempert;Richard E. Nisbett

  • Self-Concept Clarity : Measurement , Personality Correlates , and Cultural Boundaries

    Unknown

  • Reactions to Victims of Life Crises: Support Attempts That Fail

    Camille B. Wortman;Darrin R. Lehman

  • The nature of real, implanted, and fabricated memories for emotional childhood events: implications for the recovered memory debate.

    Stephen Porter;John C. Yuille;Darrin R. Lehman

  • The Undoing of Traumatic Life Events

    Christopher G. Davis;Darrin R. Lehman;Camille B. Wortman;Roxane Cohen Silver

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Heine
Steven J. Heine University of British Columbia
Camille B. Wortman
Camille B. Wortman Stony Brook University
John P. J. Pinel
John P. J. Pinel University of British Columbia
John C. Yuille
John C. Yuille University of British Columbia
Roxane Cohen Silver
Roxane Cohen Silver University of California, Irvine
Richard E. Nisbett
Richard E. Nisbett University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Anita DeLongis
Anita DeLongis University of British Columbia
Shinobu Kitayama
Shinobu Kitayama University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen Porter
Stephen Porter University of British Columbia
Paul D. Trapnell
Paul D. Trapnell University of Winnipeg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career paths, from counseling and research to organizational consulting and mental health services. Many students start by looking at popular psychology programs in Washington, D.C. or searching for most popular psychology degree programs in Delaware to find accredited and well-ranked options that fit their goals.

Online degree programs allow for flexibility, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments. By reviewing listings such as the top-ranked psychology degree programs in Fort Worth or exploring the range of popular psychology degrees in Kent, you can compare program strengths, faculty expertise, and available specializations.

Graduates of these programs can pursue licensure as counselors or psychologists, become case managers, or continue toward advanced research roles. As demand for mental health professionals continues to rise, an online psychology degree offers a flexible pathway to making a difference in individual lives and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Darrin R. Lehman

Recently Published Articles