World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
32545
World Ranking
5080
National Ranking
339

Anita DeLongis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita DeLongis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anita DeLongis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita DeLongis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anita DeLongis is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research contributions primarily span the field of psychology, with a focus on social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, and health. This multidisciplinary approach informs investigations into behavioral and mental health topics.

Their work addresses several key areas, including:

  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

DeLongis has coauthored extensively with several researchers, with frequent collaborators such as Nancy L. Sin, Patrick Klaiber, Talia Morstead, Jin Wen, and Patrick L. Hill. This network reflects ongoing collaborative efforts within psychological and health-related social science research.

Their research has appeared in a range of academic venues, notably:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Vaccine
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Social Science & Medicine

Selected recent papers exemplify DeLongis's research focus and publication activity. These include:

  • "The Ups and Downs of Daily Life During COVID-19: Age Differences in Affect, Stress, and Positive Events," 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • "Psychological distress in North America during COVID-19: The role of pandemic-related stressors," 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • "Helping Amid the Pandemic: Daily Affective and Social Implications of COVID-19-Related Prosocial Activities," 2020, The Gerontologist
  • "Coping Strategies," 2020, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology
  • "Purposefulness and daily life in a pandemic: Predicting daily affect and physical symptoms during the first weeks of the COVID-19 response," 2021, Psychology and Health

The body of work by Anita DeLongis reflects an emphasis on psychological responses to stressors, particularly in contexts influenced by aging and pandemic-related challenges. Their methodological approaches encompass examining daily life affect, stress, coping, and prosocial behaviors with implications for mental health outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus;Christine Dunkel-Schetter;Anita DeLongis

  • Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.

    Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus;Rand J. Gruen;Anita DeLongis

  • Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.

    Unknown

  • The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators.

    Anita DeLongis;Susan Folkman;Richard S. Lazarus

  • Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status

    Anita DeLongis;James C. Coyne;Gayle Dakof;Susan Folkman

  • Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.

    Unknown

  • Effects of daily stress on negative mood.

    Niall Bolger;Anita DeLongis;Ronald C. Kessler;Elizabeth A. Schilling

  • The contagion of stress across multiple roles.

    Niall Bolger;Anita DeLongis;Ronald C. Kessler;Elaine Wethington

  • Stress and adaptational outcomes. The problem of confounded measures.

    Richard S. Lazarus;Anita DeLongis;Susan Folkman;Rand Gruen

  • Going beyond social support: the role of social relationships in adaptation.

    James C. Coyne;Anita DeLongis

  • Psychological stress and coping in aging.

    Richard S. Lazarus;Anita DeLongis

  • The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators.

    Unknown

  • The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: the role of the big five personality factors.

    Tess Byrd O'Brien;Anita DeLongis

  • Coping in context: the role of stress, social support, and personality in coping.

    Anita DeLongis;Susan Holtzman

  • Effects of daily stress on negative mood.

    Unknown

  • Applying Self-Compassion in Sport: An Intervention With Women Athletes

    Amber D. Mosewich;Peter R.E. Crocker;Kent C. Kowalski;Anita DeLongis

  • Coping With Interpersonal Stress: Role of Big Five Traits

    Dayna Lee-Baggley;Melady Preece;Anita DeLongis

  • Psychological stress and coping in aging.

    Unknown

  • Positive and Negative Life Changes Following Bereavement and their Relations to Adjustment

    Darrin R. Lehman;Christopher G. Davis;Anita Delongis;Camille B. Wortman

  • Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations.

    David B. King;Norm O'Rourke;Anita DeLongis

  • The ups and downs of daily life during COVID-19: Age differences in affect, stress, and positive events.

    Patrick Klaiber;Jin H Wen;Anita DeLongis;Nancy L Sin

  • An Interpersonal Framework for Stress and Coping: an Application to the Families of Alzheimer’s Patients

    Anita DeLongis;Tess O’Brien

  • The Role of Social Support in Coping with Daily Pain among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Susan Holtzman;Sarah Newth;Anita Delongis

  • Social support and social strain among husbands and wives: a multilevel analysis.

    Anita DeLongis;Martha Capreol;Susan Holtzman;Tess O'Brien

  • Coping with Chronic Stress

    Tess Byrd O’Brien;Anita DeLongis

Frequent Co-Authors

Eli Puterman
Eli Puterman University of British Columbia
Mariët Hagedoorn
Mariët Hagedoorn University Medical Center Groningen
Richard S. Lazarus
Richard S. Lazarus University of California, Berkeley
Susan Folkman
Susan Folkman University of California, San Francisco
Edith Chen
Edith Chen Northwestern University
Niall Bolger
Niall Bolger Columbia University
Darrin R. Lehman
Darrin R. Lehman University of British Columbia
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen
Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a variety of career pathways in the mental health field. Many students choose to become licensed therapists, with marriage and family therapy (MFT) being a popular specialization. The journey to this role often includes completing a graduate program, accumulating supervised clinical hours, and passing relevant state exams.

Education and certification requirements can vary by location. For example, those researching how to become a marriage and family therapist in Fresno must be aware of California’s licensing structure. The process differs in other regions; you can learn more about how to become an mft in Garland or discover the Gilbert mft certification requirements if you plan to work in Arizona.

Understanding local expectations, such as the Glendale mft education requirements, is essential before choosing an online degree program or starting your professional journey. By researching state-specific details, you can ensure a smoother transition from study to a fulfilling career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Anita DeLongis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles