World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
72
Citations
22778
World Ranking
19790
National Ranking
302

Peter Wenaweser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wenaweser sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 244 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter Wenaweser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wenaweser sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Wenaweser is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research focuses primarily on medicine, with specific attention to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, rheumatology, cancer research, and immunology.

The scientist has contributed to studies covering topics such as immunodeficiency and autoimmune disorders, systemic lupus erythematosus research, autoimmune bullous skin diseases, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment, HIV-related health complications and treatments, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, as well as cardiac tumors and thrombi.

Frequent coauthors associated with Peter Wenaweser include Madéleine Durand, Guila Delouya, Daniel Taussky, Joseph Junior Damba, and Yulan Jin.

They have published in various venues, including:

  • Clinical Rheumatology
  • Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
  • World Journal of Oncology
  • Cancer Investigation
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Peter Wenaweser are as follows:

  • Incidence of autoimmune diseases in people living with HIV compared to a matched population: a cohort study, 2020, Clinical Rheumatology
  • Corticosteroids Use and Incidence of Severe Infections in People Living with HIV Compared to a Matched Population, 2022, Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
  • Renal Cell Carcinoma With Cardiac Metastases, 2021, World Journal of Oncology
  • Prevalence and Risk Factors of QTc Prolongation in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Brachytherapy, 2022, Cancer Investigation
  • The impact of β-blockers on the central and delta systolic pressures in a real-world population with treated hypertension: A cross-sectional study, 2022, Health Science Reports

Best Publications

  • Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study

    Joost Daemen;Peter Wenaweser;Keiichi Tsuchida;Linda Abrecht

  • Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome.

    Eberhard Grube;Gerhard Schuler;Lutz Buellesfeld;Ulrich Gerckens

  • Incomplete Stent Apposition and Very Late Stent Thrombosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

    Stéphane Cook;Peter Wenaweser;Mario Togni;Michael Billinger

  • Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve ReValving System: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval

    Nicolo Piazza;Eberhard Grube;Ulrich Gerckens;Peter den Heijer

  • Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization.

    Stephan Windecker;Andrea Remondino;Franz R. Eberli;Peter Jüni

  • Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVR : A Meta-Analysis

    George C.M. Siontis;Peter Jüni;Thomas Pilgrim;Stefan Stortecky

  • Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study.

    Peter Wenaweser;Joost Daemen;Marcel Zwahlen;Ron van Domburg

  • Correlation of Intravascular Ultrasound Findings With Histopathological Analysis of Thrombus Aspirates in Patients With Very Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis

    Stéphane Cook;Elena Ladich;Gaku Nakazawa;Parham Eshtehardi

  • Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Associated With Paradoxic Coronary Vasoconstriction

    Mario Togni;Stephan Windecker;Rosangela Cocchia;Peter Wenaweser

  • Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study.

    Lorenz Räber;Michael Magro;Giulio G. Stefanini;Bindu Kalesan

  • Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the COMFORTABLE AMI randomized trial.

    Lorenz Räber;Henning Kelbæk;Miodrag Ostojic;Andreas Baumbach

  • Beneficial Effect of Recruitable Collaterals A 10-Year Follow-Up Study in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Quantitative Collateral Measurements

    Pascal Meier;Steffen Gloekler;Rainer Zbinden;Sarah Beckh

  • Stent thrombosis is associated with an impaired response to antiplatelet therapy

    Peter Wenaweser;Janine Dörffler-Melly;Katja Imboden;Stephan Windecker

  • Evaluation of Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment as a Predictor of Mortality and Cardiovascular Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Stefan Stortecky;Andreas W. Schoenenberger;André Moser;Bindu Kalesan

  • High heart rate: a cardiovascular risk factor?

    Stéphane Cook;Mario Togni;Marcus C Schaub;Peter Wenaweser

  • TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE DISEASE

    Darren Mylotte;Thierry Lefevre;Lars Søndergaard;Yusuke Watanabe

  • Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic regurgitation in degenerated bioprosthesis: the first valve in valve procedure using the Corevalve Revalving system.

    Peter Wenaweser;Lutz Buellesfeld;Ulrich Gerckens;Eberhard Grube

  • Predictors of functional decline in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

    Andreas W. Schoenenberger;Stefan Stortecky;Stephanie Neumann;André Moser

  • Ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary revascularisation (BIOSCIENCE): a randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority trial

    Thomas Pilgrim;Dik Heg;Marco Roffi;David Tüller

  • Stent thrombosis following bare-metal stent implantation: success of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and predictors of adverse outcome

    Peter Wenaweser;Christoph Rey;Franz R. Eberli;Mario Togni

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Bernhard Meier
Bernhard Meier University Hospital of Bern
Peter Jüni
Peter Jüni University of Oxford
Thierry Carrel
Thierry Carrel University of Bern
Otto M. Hess
Otto M. Hess University of Bern
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Axel Linke
Axel Linke TU Dresden
Roberto Corti
Roberto Corti University of Zurich
Francesco Maisano
Francesco Maisano University of Zurich
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens the door to a wide range of related healthcare degrees and professional routes, many of which can be completed online for added flexibility. For registered nurses looking to advance, asn to nurse practitioner programs provide a seamless path toward a more specialized and autonomous practice.

Those interested in preventive health and wellness may opt for a nutritionist online degree, which offers foundational knowledge in dietetics and health promotion entirely online.

For aspiring healthcare leaders, choosing a program from the cahme accredited online mha programs list ensures you receive a quality education aligned with industry standards.

Additionally, RNs seeking to elevate their credentials can check out rn bsn online programs no clinicals, which allow nurses to obtain their BSN degree without the need for in-person clinical components.

These online degree pathways not only expand your healthcare knowledge but also enhance your career options, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wenaweser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles