World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
30136
World Ranking
10535
National Ranking
417

Peter de Jaegere publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter de Jaegere sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter de Jaegere D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter de Jaegere sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter de Jaegere is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research contributions primarily focus on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their work covers several subfields of study, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter de Jaegere include:

  • "Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease," 2022, published in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • "2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases," 2024, published in European Heart Journal
  • "Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thrombosis," 2020, published in Cardiovascular Research
  • "Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial," 2022, published in European Heart Journal
  • "Antithrombotic therapies in aortic and peripheral arterial diseases in 2021: a consensus document from the ESC working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, the ESC working group on thrombosis, and the ESC working group on cardiovascular pharmacotherapy," 2021, published in European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors of Peter de Jaegere include:

  • Giuseppe Tarantini
  • Cristina Giannini
  • Matteo Montorfano
  • Marco Angelillis
  • Giulia Costa

They often publish in venues such as:

  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal Supplements

Best Publications

  • Late Angiographic Stent Thrombosis (LAST) Events With Drug-Eluting Stents

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Eugène P. McFadden;Evelyn Regar;Peter P.T. de Jaegere

  • Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve ReValving System: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval

    Nicolo Piazza;Eberhard Grube;Ulrich Gerckens;Peter den Heijer

  • Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve

    Nicoló Piazza;Peter de Jaegere;Carl Schultz;Anton E. Becker

  • Early Outcome After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery Results From a Randomized Study

    Diederik van Dijk;Arno P. Nierich;Erik W.L. Jansen;Hendrik M. Nathoe

  • Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Angela Hoye;Jiro Aoki;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem

  • Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump Coronary artery bypass graft surgery a Randomized trial

    Diederik Van Dijk;Erik W. L. Jansen;Ron Hijman;Arno P. Nierich

  • Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)

    P. de Jaegere;H. Mudra;H. Figulla;Y. Almagor

  • Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry.

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;John G. Webb;Raj R. Makkar;Mauricio G. Cohen

  • A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients.

    Hendrik M. Nathoe;Diederik van Dijk;Erik W.L. Jansen;Willem J.L. Suyker

  • A Clinical Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety of a Noninvasive Approach in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: The DECREASE-V Pilot Study

    Don Poldermans;Olaf Schouten;Radosav Vidakovic;Jeroen J. Bax

  • Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Insights From the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital Registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH)

    Marco Valgimigli;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Andrew T.L. Ong;Jiro Aoki

  • 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With High, Intermediate, or Low Pretest Probability of Significant Coronary Artery Disease

    W. Bob Meijboom;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Nico R. Mollet;Francesca Pugliese

  • Timing, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Events in a Large Cohort of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Luis Nombela-Franco;John G. Webb;Peter P. de Jaegere;Stefan Toggweiler

  • Early and persistent intraventricular conduction abnormalities and requirements for pacemaking after percutaneous replacement of the aortic valve.

    Nicolo Piazza;Yoshinobu Onuma;Emile Jesserun;Peter Paul Kint

  • Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of lesions in saphenous vein bypass grafts.

    Pim J. de Feyter;Robert-Jan van Suylen;Peter P.T. de Jaegere;Eric J. Topol

  • Individual risk assessment for intracranial haemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy

    ML Simoons;P de Jaegere;R van Domburg;E Boersma

  • Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery

    Diederik van Dijk;Monique Spoor;Ron Hijman;Hendrik M. Nathoe

  • The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry.

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Patrick W. Serruys;Jiro Aoki;Angela Hoye

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Access Site Complications With Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Didier Tchetche;Alaide Chieffo;Nicolas Dumonteil

  • Left Bundle-Branch Block Induced by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Increases Risk of Death

    Patrick Houthuizen;Leen A. F.M Van Garsse;Thomas T. Poels;Peter de Jaegere

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert-Jan van Geuns
Robert-Jan van Geuns Radboud University
Evelyn Regar
Evelyn Regar University of Zurich
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Marco Valgimigli
Marco Valgimigli University of Bern
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau Université Laval
Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare degrees online can be a flexible and efficient way to broaden your career options in medicine and allied fields. For those interested in nutrition and wellness, online nutrition degrees deliver foundational knowledge in dietetics and health, often paving the way to roles in clinical nutrition, research, or public health.

If you’re aspiring to lead or manage healthcare organizations, top online mha programs that are cahme accredited provide rigorous training in administration while ensuring quality with CAHME accreditation—an industry standard for healthcare management education.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement can benefit from rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which let you earn a BSN without putting your career on hold for additional clinical requirements.

For nurses who've already earned their master’s, advancing further is possible with the shortest post master's dnp program, allowing you to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice quickly and fully online.

These online programs can help diversify your expertise, expand leadership opportunities, and provide flexible study options while pursuing a career in medicine or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter de Jaegere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles