World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10534 9888 417 403 453 30136

Peter de Jaegere publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter de Jaegere between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter de Jaegere published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2012. 52 of the 526 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2012. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 7 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 16 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 29 publications
1990 2025

526 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter de Jaegere: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 7
1993 12
1994 12
1995 16
1996 8
1997 1
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 12
2006 20
2007 13
2008 18
2009 17
2010 22
2011 18
2012 40
2013 25
2014 26
2015 25
2016 27
2017 32
2018 21
2019 21
2020 16
2021 21
2022 9
2023 12
2024 23
2025 29
Total 526
Download as CSV

Peter de Jaegere publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter de Jaegere sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 453 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 453
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter de Jaegere D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter de Jaegere sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter de Jaegere is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research contributions primarily focus on medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their work covers several subfields of study, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Key research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter de Jaegere include:

  • "Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease," 2022, published in European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • "2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases," 2024, published in European Heart Journal
  • "Endothelial function in cardiovascular medicine: a consensus paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Coronary Pathophysiology and Microcirculation, and Thrombosis," 2020, published in Cardiovascular Research
  • "Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial," 2022, published in European Heart Journal
  • "Antithrombotic therapies in aortic and peripheral arterial diseases in 2021: a consensus document from the ESC working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases, the ESC working group on thrombosis, and the ESC working group on cardiovascular pharmacotherapy," 2021, published in European Heart Journal

Frequent co-authors of Peter de Jaegere include:

  • Giuseppe Tarantini
  • Cristina Giannini
  • Matteo Montorfano
  • Marco Angelillis
  • Giulia Costa

They often publish in venues such as:

  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • Clinical Research in Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal Supplements

Best Publications

  • Late Angiographic Stent Thrombosis (LAST) Events With Drug-Eluting Stents

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Eugène P. McFadden;Evelyn Regar;Peter P.T. de Jaegere

  • Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve ReValving System: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval

    Nicolo Piazza;Eberhard Grube;Ulrich Gerckens;Peter den Heijer

  • Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve

    Nicoló Piazza;Peter de Jaegere;Carl Schultz;Anton E. Becker

  • Early Outcome After Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery Results From a Randomized Study

    Diederik van Dijk;Arno P. Nierich;Erik W.L. Jansen;Hendrik M. Nathoe

  • Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Angela Hoye;Jiro Aoki;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem

  • Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump Coronary artery bypass graft surgery a Randomized trial

    Diederik Van Dijk;Erik W. L. Jansen;Ron Hijman;Arno P. Nierich

  • Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)

    P. de Jaegere;H. Mudra;H. Figulla;Y. Almagor

  • Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry.

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;John G. Webb;Raj R. Makkar;Mauricio G. Cohen

  • A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients.

    Hendrik M. Nathoe;Diederik van Dijk;Erik W.L. Jansen;Willem J.L. Suyker

  • A Clinical Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Safety of a Noninvasive Approach in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery: The DECREASE-V Pilot Study

    Don Poldermans;Olaf Schouten;Radosav Vidakovic;Jeroen J. Bax

  • Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Insights From the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital Registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH)

    Marco Valgimigli;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Andrew T.L. Ong;Jiro Aoki

  • 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients With High, Intermediate, or Low Pretest Probability of Significant Coronary Artery Disease

    W. Bob Meijboom;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Nico R. Mollet;Francesca Pugliese

  • Timing, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Events in a Large Cohort of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Luis Nombela-Franco;John G. Webb;Peter P. de Jaegere;Stefan Toggweiler

  • Early and persistent intraventricular conduction abnormalities and requirements for pacemaking after percutaneous replacement of the aortic valve.

    Nicolo Piazza;Yoshinobu Onuma;Emile Jesserun;Peter Paul Kint

  • Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of lesions in saphenous vein bypass grafts.

    Pim J. de Feyter;Robert-Jan van Suylen;Peter P.T. de Jaegere;Eric J. Topol

  • Individual risk assessment for intracranial haemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy

    ML Simoons;P de Jaegere;R van Domburg;E Boersma

  • Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery

    Diederik van Dijk;Monique Spoor;Ron Hijman;Hendrik M. Nathoe

  • The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry.

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Patrick W. Serruys;Jiro Aoki;Angela Hoye

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Access Site Complications With Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Didier Tchetche;Alaide Chieffo;Nicolas Dumonteil

  • Left Bundle-Branch Block Induced by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Increases Risk of Death

    Patrick Houthuizen;Leen A. F.M Van Garsse;Thomas T. Poels;Peter de Jaegere

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert-Jan van Geuns
Robert-Jan van Geuns Radboud University
Evelyn Regar
Evelyn Regar University of Zurich
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Marco Valgimigli
Marco Valgimigli University of Bern
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau Université Laval
Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related healthcare degrees online can be a flexible and efficient way to broaden your career options in medicine and allied fields. For those interested in nutrition and wellness, online nutrition degrees deliver foundational knowledge in dietetics and health, often paving the way to roles in clinical nutrition, research, or public health.

If you’re aspiring to lead or manage healthcare organizations, top online mha programs that are cahme accredited provide rigorous training in administration while ensuring quality with CAHME accreditation—an industry standard for healthcare management education.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement can benefit from rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which let you earn a BSN without putting your career on hold for additional clinical requirements.

For nurses who've already earned their master’s, advancing further is possible with the shortest post master's dnp program, allowing you to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice quickly and fully online.

These online programs can help diversify your expertise, expand leadership opportunities, and provide flexible study options while pursuing a career in medicine or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Peter de Jaegere

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles