World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
35914
World Ranking
10404
National Ranking
412

Ron T. van Domburg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron T. van Domburg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 627 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ron T. van Domburg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ron T. van Domburg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ron T. van Domburg is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Statistics and Probability, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research covers multiple key topics related to cardiac health and diagnostics. These topics include:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Ron T. van Domburg has authored several papers in peer-reviewed journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Patients who do not complete cardiac rehabilitation have an increased risk of cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up" (2020, Netherlands Heart Journal)
  • "Stress-Only Adenosine CMR Improves Diagnostic Yield in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Coronary Artery Calcium" (2020, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging)
  • "Comparison of guidelines for diagnosing suspected stable angina and the additional value of the calcium score" (2021, International Journal of Cardiology)
  • "Quality-of-Life Assessment" (2020, Definitions)
  • "Relative conditional survival analysis provides additional insights into the prognosis of heart failure patients" (2021, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Netherlands Heart Journal
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • International Journal of Cardiology
  • Definitions
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Collaboration forms an important part of their research efforts. Common coauthors include:

  • Jaap W. Deckers
  • Eric Boersma
  • Dorine Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen
  • Dirkjan Kuijpers
  • Paul R. M. van Dijkman

Best Publications

  • Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study

    Joost Daemen;Peter Wenaweser;Keiichi Tsuchida;Linda Abrecht

  • Late Angiographic Stent Thrombosis (LAST) Events With Drug-Eluting Stents

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Eugène P. McFadden;Evelyn Regar;Peter P.T. de Jaegere

  • Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World” The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry

    Pedro A. Lemos;Patrick W. Serruys;Ron T. van Domburg;Francesco Saia

  • Thirty-day incidence and six-month clinical outcome of thrombotic stent occlusion after bare-metal, sirolimus, or paclitaxel stent implantation

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Angela Hoye;Jiro Aoki;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem

  • Incidence and correlates of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice. 4-year results from a large 2-institutional cohort study.

    Peter Wenaweser;Joost Daemen;Marcel Zwahlen;Ron van Domburg

  • Angiographic Stent Thrombosis After Routine Use of Drug-Eluting Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The Importance of Thrombus Burden

    Georgios Sianos;Michail I. Papafaklis;Joost Daemen;Sofia Vaina

  • Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

    Jin M Cheng;Corstiaan A den Uil;Sanne E Hoeks;Martin van der Ent

  • Short- and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for the Percutaneous Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Insights From the Rapamycin-Eluting and Taxus Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital Registries (RESEARCH and T-SEARCH)

    Marco Valgimigli;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem;Andrew T.L. Ong;Jiro Aoki

  • Clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients: an evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Angela Hoye;Dick Goedhart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions: the Thoraxcenter experience 1992-2002.

    Angela Hoye;Ron T. van Domburg;Karel Sonnenschein;Patrick W. Serruys

  • Acute coronary artery occlusion during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Frequency, prediction, clinical course, management, and follow-up.

    P J de Feyter;M van den Brand;G J Laarman;R van Domburg

  • Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study.

    Lorenz Räber;Michael Magro;Giulio G. Stefanini;Bindu Kalesan

  • Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Francesco Saia;Jurgen M.R. Ligthart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • In vivo detection of high-risk coronary plaques by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound and cardiovascular outcome: results of the ATHEROREMO-IVUS study.

    Jin M. Cheng;Hector M. Garcia-Garcia;Sanneke P.M. de Boer;Isabella Kardys

  • Carotid intima-media thickness for cardiovascular risk assessment: Systematic review and meta-analysis

    Stijn C.H. van den Oord;Eric J.G. Sijbrands;Gerrit L. ten Kate;David van Klaveren

  • Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome.

    Angela Hoye;Ioannis Iakovou;Lei Ge;Carlos A.G. van Mieghem

  • The unrestricted use of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in an unselected population: one-year results of the Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registry.

    Andrew T.L. Ong;Patrick W. Serruys;Jiro Aoki;Angela Hoye

  • Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    Pedro A Lemos;Francesco Saia;Sjoerd H Hofma;Joost Daemen

  • Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions

    Angela Hoye;Kengo Tanabe;Pedro A Lemos;Jiro Aoki

  • Association between long-term statin use and mortality after successful abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

    Miklos D Kertai;Eric Boersma;Cynthia M Westerhout;Ron van Domburg

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Don Poldermans
Don Poldermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam
Susanne S. Pedersen
Susanne S. Pedersen University of Southern Denmark
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert-Jan van Geuns
Robert-Jan van Geuns Radboud University
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pedro A. Lemos
Pedro A. Lemos Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Medicine isn’t the only pathway to launch a rewarding healthcare career in the USA. Many students consider alternative routes, with a growing number choosing online programs for flexibility and accessibility.

For those drawn to nursing, some easy nursing programs to get into offer less competitive admission requirements, letting you begin your journey even with a lower GPA or without extensive prerequisites.

Additionally, if you're entering the workforce quickly, explore the option of an lpn program without teas test requirements, removing extra testing barriers for aspiring practical nurses.

For those more interested in administrative healthcare roles, you can find accelerated healthcare administration degree online options. These fast-track courses help you earn credentials quickly and move into management positions.

If coding and administrative skills appeal to you, you might wonder: can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? The answer is yes—financial support can make these in-demand programs more affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Ron T. van Domburg

Trending Scientists