World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18403 17290 52 49 597 22440

Pedro A. Lemos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pedro A. Lemos between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pedro A. Lemos published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 18.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2015. 35 of the 708 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2015. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 7 publications 2003: 29 publications 2004: 46 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 41 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 46 publications 2015: 58 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 53 publications 2018: 51 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 13 publications
1988 2025

708 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pedro A. Lemos: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 7
2003 29
2004 46
2005 22
2006 16
2007 14
2008 19
2009 17
2010 20
2011 17
2012 41
2013 49
2014 46
2015 58
2016 39
2017 53
2018 51
2019 26
2020 29
2021 32
2022 18
2023 20
2024 22
2025 13
Total 708
Download as CSV

Pedro A. Lemos publications per year - data summary

  • Pedro A. Lemos, a Medicine scholar from Universidade de São Paulo, has 708 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 58 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988, 1999, 2000 and 2001, with 1 publication each.
  • 10 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 18.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 25.3 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 105 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 3 publications (0.2 per year); 2001-2013: 298 publications (22.9 per year); 2014-2025: 407 publications (33.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Pedro A. Lemos publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro A. Lemos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 597 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 597
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Pedro A. Lemos publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Pedro A. Lemos, a Medicine scholar from Universidade de São Paulo, records 597 publications - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Pedro A. Lemos, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Pedro A. Lemos ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Pedro A. Lemos D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro A. Lemos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Pedro A. Lemos D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Pedro A. Lemos, a Medicine scholar from Universidade de São Paulo, records 77 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Pedro A. Lemos, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Pedro A. Lemos ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Pedro A. Lemos is affiliated with the Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine with a significant emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly work encompasses several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pedro A. Lemos include Alexandre Abizaid, Patrick W. Serruys, Héctor M. García-García, Yoshinobu Onuma, and Marcelo Franken.

Pedro A. Lemos' work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Recent publications highlight important contributions to cardiovascular medicine. These include:

  • "Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium," Circulation, 2023
  • "Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Angina Instável e Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST - 2021," Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2021
  • "Aspirin-Free Prasugrel Monotherapy Following Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable CAD," JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
  • "Atualização das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Valvopatias - 2020," Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2020
  • "Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology," Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020

Best Publications

  • Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography

    Koen Nieman;Filippo Cademartiri;Pedro A. Lemos;Rolf Raaijmakers

  • Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World” The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry

    Pedro A. Lemos;Patrick W. Serruys;Ron T. van Domburg;Francesco Saia

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature

    Ganesh Athappan;Eshan Patvardhan;E. Murat Tuzcu;Lars Georg Svensson

  • Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Peter Jüni;Christian Hamm

  • Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris

    Nico R Mollet;Filippo Cademartiri;Koen Nieman;Francesco Saia

  • Indication of long-term endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

    Sjoerd H. Hofma;Wim J. van der Giessen;Bas M. van Dalen;Pedro A. Lemos

  • High ratio of triglycerides to hdl-cholesterol predicts extensive coronary disease

    Protasio Lemos da Luz;Desiderio Favarato;Jose Rocha Faria-Neto Junior;Pedro Lemos

  • Clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients: an evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Angela Hoye;Dick Goedhart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease : A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials

    Joost Daemen;Eric Boersma;Marcus Flather;Jean Booth

  • Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial

    Michael Haude;Hüseyin Ince;Alexandre Abizaid;Ralph Toelg

  • Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Francesco Saia;Jurgen M.R. Ligthart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: insights from the VIVID registry

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;Henrique B. Ribeiro;Josep Rodés-Cabau;Philipp Blanke;Jonathon Leipsic

  • Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    Pedro A Lemos;Francesco Saia;Sjoerd H Hofma;Joost Daemen

  • Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Infective Endocarditis and In-Hospital Death

    Ander Regueiro;Axel Linke;Azeem Latib;Nikolaj Ihlemann

  • Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions

    Angela Hoye;Kengo Tanabe;Pedro A Lemos;Jiro Aoki

  • Stent fracture and restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era.

    Georgios Sianos;Sjoerd Hofma;Jurgen M.R. Ligthart;Francesco Saia

  • Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions.

    Nico R. Mollet;Angela Hoye;Pedro A. Lemos;Filippo Cademartiri

  • One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials

    Nestor Mercado;Nestor Mercado;William Wijns;Patrick W. Serruys;Ulrich Sigwart

  • Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.

    Pedro A Lemos;Chi-hang Lee;Muzaffer Degertekin;Francesco Saia

  • Late cardiac death in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: incidence and predictors of advanced heart failure and sudden cardiac death.

    Marina Urena;John G. Webb;Helene Eltchaninoff;Antonio J. Muñoz-García

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eugene P. McFadden
Eugene P. McFadden Cork University Hospital
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway
Michael Haude
Michael Haude Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
José Eduardo Krieger
José Eduardo Krieger Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is just one pathway in the broad and rapidly evolving healthcare field. Students interested in alternative entry points or looking for flexible study options have a range of online healthcare degrees to consider.

For those drawn to patient care, there are easy nursing schools to get into, offering supportive admissions processes and accessible education. If standardized testing feels like a barrier, explore nursing school that don't require teas, which can streamline the application process.

Interested in the administrative side of healthcare? Accredited programs provide opportunities for career advancement. Consider a accelerated healthcare administration degree online to prepare for leadership positions, often in less time than traditional on-campus degrees.

Those who prefer working behind the scenes can pursue vital roles in healthcare settings through medical billing and coding schools online—a flexible, in-demand profession with robust growth.

These alternative career pathways offer flexible, reputable, and accessible online programs to help you enter rewarding healthcare fields without the long educational commitment of a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro A. Lemos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles