World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
22440
World Ranking
18403
National Ranking
52

Pedro A. Lemos publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro A. Lemos sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 597 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Pedro A. Lemos D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro A. Lemos sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro A. Lemos is affiliated with the Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine with a significant emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly work encompasses several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Pedro A. Lemos include Alexandre Abizaid, Patrick W. Serruys, Héctor M. García-García, Yoshinobu Onuma, and Marcelo Franken.

Pedro A. Lemos' work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Recent publications highlight important contributions to cardiovascular medicine. These include:

  • "Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium," Circulation, 2023
  • "Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia sobre Angina Instável e Infarto Agudo do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST - 2021," Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2021
  • "Aspirin-Free Prasugrel Monotherapy Following Coronary Artery Stenting in Patients With Stable CAD," JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
  • "Atualização das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Valvopatias - 2020," Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 2020
  • "Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology," Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020

Best Publications

  • Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography

    Koen Nieman;Filippo Cademartiri;Pedro A. Lemos;Rolf Raaijmakers

  • Unrestricted Utilization of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Compared With Conventional Bare Stent Implantation in the “Real World” The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Registry

    Pedro A. Lemos;Patrick W. Serruys;Ron T. van Domburg;Francesco Saia

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Literature

    Ganesh Athappan;Eshan Patvardhan;E. Murat Tuzcu;Lars Georg Svensson

  • Ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month, followed by ticagrelor monotherapy for 23 months vs aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months after implantation of a drug-eluting stent: a multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial

    Pascal Vranckx;Marco Valgimigli;Peter Jüni;Christian Hamm

  • Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris

    Nico R Mollet;Filippo Cademartiri;Koen Nieman;Francesco Saia

  • Indication of long-term endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

    Sjoerd H. Hofma;Wim J. van der Giessen;Bas M. van Dalen;Pedro A. Lemos

  • High ratio of triglycerides to hdl-cholesterol predicts extensive coronary disease

    Protasio Lemos da Luz;Desiderio Favarato;Jose Rocha Faria-Neto Junior;Pedro Lemos

  • Clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients: an evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Angela Hoye;Dick Goedhart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease : A Meta-Analysis With 5-Year Patient-Level Data From the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS Trials

    Joost Daemen;Eric Boersma;Marcus Flather;Jean Booth

  • Safety and performance of the second-generation drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold in patients with de-novo coronary artery lesions (BIOSOLVE-II): 6 month results of a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, first-in-man trial

    Michael Haude;Hüseyin Ince;Alexandre Abizaid;Ralph Toelg

  • Coronary restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: morphological description and mechanistic analysis from a consecutive series of cases.

    Pedro A. Lemos;Francesco Saia;Jurgen M.R. Ligthart;Chourmouzios A. Arampatzis

  • Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: insights from the VIVID registry

    Henrique B. Ribeiro;Henrique B. Ribeiro;Josep Rodés-Cabau;Philipp Blanke;Jonathon Leipsic

  • Short- and long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

    Pedro A Lemos;Francesco Saia;Sjoerd H Hofma;Joost Daemen

  • Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Subsequent Infective Endocarditis and In-Hospital Death

    Ander Regueiro;Axel Linke;Azeem Latib;Nikolaj Ihlemann

  • Significant reduction in restenosis after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of chronic total occlusions

    Angela Hoye;Kengo Tanabe;Pedro A Lemos;Jiro Aoki

  • Stent fracture and restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era.

    Georgios Sianos;Sjoerd Hofma;Jurgen M.R. Ligthart;Francesco Saia

  • Value of preprocedure multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to predict the outcome of percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusions.

    Nico R. Mollet;Angela Hoye;Pedro A. Lemos;Filippo Cademartiri

  • One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials

    Nestor Mercado;Nestor Mercado;William Wijns;Patrick W. Serruys;Ulrich Sigwart

  • Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.

    Pedro A Lemos;Chi-hang Lee;Muzaffer Degertekin;Francesco Saia

  • Late cardiac death in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: incidence and predictors of advanced heart failure and sudden cardiac death.

    Marina Urena;John G. Webb;Helene Eltchaninoff;Antonio J. Muñoz-García

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eugene P. McFadden
Eugene P. McFadden Cork University Hospital
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway
Michael Haude
Michael Haude Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Ron Waksman
Ron Waksman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia
Hector M. Garcia-Garcia MedStar Washington Hospital Center
José Eduardo Krieger
José Eduardo Krieger Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine is just one pathway in the broad and rapidly evolving healthcare field. Students interested in alternative entry points or looking for flexible study options have a range of online healthcare degrees to consider.

For those drawn to patient care, there are easy nursing schools to get into, offering supportive admissions processes and accessible education. If standardized testing feels like a barrier, explore nursing school that don't require teas, which can streamline the application process.

Interested in the administrative side of healthcare? Accredited programs provide opportunities for career advancement. Consider a accelerated healthcare administration degree online to prepare for leadership positions, often in less time than traditional on-campus degrees.

Those who prefer working behind the scenes can pursue vital roles in healthcare settings through medical billing and coding schools online—a flexible, in-demand profession with robust growth.

These alternative career pathways offer flexible, reputable, and accessible online programs to help you enter rewarding healthcare fields without the long educational commitment of a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro A. Lemos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles