World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
49869
World Ranking
6694
National Ranking
99

Javier Escaned publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Escaned sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 937 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Javier Escaned D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javier Escaned sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Javier Escaned is affiliated with Hospital Clínico San Carlos in Spain and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering.

The content of their research focuses on topics such as Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Nieves Gonzalo
  • Hernán Mejía-Rentería
  • Luis Nombela-Franco
  • Iván J. Núñez-Gil
  • Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo

Javier Escaned has published numerous articles across various reputable journals, with a significant number of contributions in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (54 publications)
  • European Heart Journal (50 publications)
  • EuroIntervention (42 publications)
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (35 publications)
  • International Journal of Cardiology (25 publications)

Notable recent papers include:

  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention, 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Thin-cap fibroatheroma predicts clinical events in diabetic patients with normal fractional flow reserve: the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Complete or Culprit-Only PCI in Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Global Chronic Total Occlusion Crossing Algorithm, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.

    Juhani Knuuti;William Wijns;Antti Saraste;Davide Capodanno

  • Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis A Randomized Trial

    G. Jan Willem Bech;Bernard De Bruyne;Nico H.J. Pijls;Ebo D. de Muinck

  • ESC guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD - summary.

    pre-diabetes Task Force on diabetes;Lars Rydén

  • Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

    J. E. Davies;S. Sen;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;R. Al-Lamee

  • Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study.

    Sayan Sen;Javier Escaned;Iqbal S. Malik;Ghada W. Mikhail

  • Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI

    Roxana Mehran;Usman Baber;Samin K Sharma;David J Cohen

  • Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from a pooled analysis including 10 randomized studies.

    Raúl Moreno;Cristina Fernández;Rosana Hernández;Fernando Alfonso

  • Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.

    Lorenz Räber;Gary S Mintz;Konstantinos C Koskinas;Thomas W Johnson

  • Platelet Function Profiles in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease on Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Treatment

    Dominick J. Angiolillo;Antonio Fernandez-Ortiz;Esther Bernardo;Celia Ramírez

  • ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. The Task Force on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and developed in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD)

    Lars Rydén;Peter J. Grant;Stefan D. Anker;Christian Berne

  • An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group.

    Vijay Kunadian;Alaide Chieffo;Paolo G. Camici;Colin Berry

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.

    Daniel J F M Thuijs;A Pieter Kappetein;Patrick W Serruys;Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr

  • Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Standard Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) Trial

    Manel Sabaté;Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo;Dominick J. Angiolillo;Joan Antoni Gómez-Hospital

  • Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial.

    Frederik M. Zimmermann;Angela Ferrara;Nils P. Johnson;Lokien X. Van Nunen

  • A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions.

    Gerald S Werner;Victoria Martin-Yuste;David Hildick-Smith;Nicolas Boudou

  • Impact of Platelet Reactivity on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease

    Dominick J. Angiolillo;Esther Bernardo;Manel Sabaté;Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo

  • High clopidogrel loading dose during coronary stenting: effects on drug response and interindividual variability

    Dominick J. Angiolillo;Antonio Fernández-Ortiz;Esther Bernardo;Celia Ramírez

  • Recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO club.

    Georgios Sianos;Gerald S. Werner;Alfredo R. Galassi;Michail I. Papafaklis

  • Interventional cardiology abstractFractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial☆

    G.J.W Bech;B De Bruyne;N.H.J Pijls

  • Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis

    Frederik M. Zimmermann;A. Ferrara;Nils P. Johnson;L.X. van Nunen

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos Macaya
Carlos Macaya Complutense University of Madrid
Fernando Alfonso
Fernando Alfonso Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Jan J. Piek
Jan J. Piek University of Amsterdam
Manel Sabaté
Manel Sabaté University of Barcelona
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Carlo Di Mario
Carlo Di Mario University of Florence
Dominick J. Angiolillo
Dominick J. Angiolillo University of Florida
Darrel P. Francis
Darrel P. Francis Imperial College London
Bon-Kwon Koo
Bon-Kwon Koo Seoul National University Hospital
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical studies in the USA, online degrees offer flexibility, fast-tracked options, and diverse career pathways. Many aspiring healthcare professionals now choose accelerated programs to quickly enhance their credentials and enter the workforce.

Advanced nursing programs, such as the shortest msn to dnp program, allow registered nurses to move up the ladder in the shortest time possible. Similarly, the 1 year dnp program online caters to those who want to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree at an accelerated pace.

Entry-level roles also benefit from online education. The lpn programs provide speedy paths for those starting their nursing careers, giving them access to stable healthcare jobs within months.

Additionally, online MSN specializations are growing in popularity. For mental health professionals, the online msn pmhnp programs offer fast-track pathways to become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, a role in high demand across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Javier Escaned

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles