World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carlo Di Mario

Carlo Di Mario

Award Badge
Medicine
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
65359
World Ranking
3561
National Ranking
104

Carlo Di Mario publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Di Mario sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 969 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Carlo Di Mario D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo Di Mario sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Carlo Di Mario is affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy and specializes in Medicine, with a primary focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans several subfields including Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their work centers around key topics such as Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, and Peripheral Artery Disease Management.

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Alessio Mattesini, Francesco Meucci, Giulia Nardi, Miroslava Stolcova, and Niccolò Ciardetti.

Carlo Di Mario has published extensively in a number of well-known scientific venues. The most common publication venues are:

  • European Heart Journal
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • European Heart Journal Supplements
  • EuroIntervention
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Carlo Di Mario include:

  • Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention, 2022, Nature Reviews Cardiology
  • Definitions and Clinical Trial Design Principles for Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Therapies: CTO-ARC Consensus Recommendations, 2021, Circulation
  • Global Chronic Total Occlusion Crossing Algorithm, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions, 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Gilles Montalescot;Udo Sechtem;Stephan Achenbach;Felicita Andreotti

  • Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Frans Van de Werf;Jeroen Bax;Amadeo Betriu;Carina Blomstrom-Lundqvist

  • Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

    Guillermo J. Tearney;Evelyn Regar;Takashi Akasaka;Tom Adriaenssens

  • Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: Physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis

    Francesco Prati;Evelyn Regar;Gary S. Mintz;Eloisa Arbustini

  • Randomized study to evaluate Sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions

    Antonio Colombo;Jeffrey W. Moses;Marie Claude Morice;Josef Ludwig

  • Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial

    Raimund Erbel;Carlo Di Mario;Jozef Bartunek;Johann Bonnier

  • Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI

    J. E. Davies;S. Sen;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;H. M. Dehbi;R. Al-Lamee

  • Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study.

    Sayan Sen;Javier Escaned;Iqbal S. Malik;Ghada W. Mikhail

  • Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era.

    Salvatore De Rosa;Carmen Spaccarotella;Cristina Basso;Maria Pia Calabrò

  • Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

    Philippe Kolh;William Wijns;Nicolas Danchin;Carlo Di Mario

  • Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Stephan Windecker;Patrick Serruys;Simon Wandel;Pawel Buszman

  • Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions.

    Lorenz Räber;Gary S Mintz;Konstantinos C Koskinas;Thomas W Johnson

  • Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE).

    Zoran Olivari;Paolo Rubartelli;Federico Piscione;Federica Ettori

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Transcatheter Occlusion (PLAATO System) to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Patients With Non-Rheumatic Atrial Fibrillation : Results From the International Multi-Center Feasibility Trials

    Stefan H. Ostermayer;Mark Reisman;Paul H. Kramer;Ray V. Matthews

  • Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry

    Davide Capodanno;Tommaso Gori;Holger Nef;Azeem Latib

  • Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial.

    Carlo Di Mario;Dariusz Dudek;Federico Piscione;Waldemar Mielecki

  • A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions.

    Gerald S Werner;Victoria Martin-Yuste;David Hildick-Smith;Nicolas Boudou

  • Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent—immediate and follow-up results

    Takehiro Yamashita;Takahiro Nishida;Milena G Adamian;Carlo Briguori

  • Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care** and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Martial Hamon;Christian Pristipino;Carlo Di Mario;James Nolan

  • Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries.

    Steen D. Kristensen;Kristina G. Laut;Jean Fajadet;Zuzana Kaifoszova

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Colombo
Antonio Colombo Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Javier Escaned
Javier Escaned Hospital Clínico San Carlos
William Wijns
William Wijns University of Galway
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Davide Capodanno
Davide Capodanno University of Catania
Thomas F. Lüscher
Thomas F. Lüscher University of Zurich
Darrel P. Francis
Darrel P. Francis Imperial College London
Alaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Peter Jüni
Peter Jüni University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of healthcare careers—even beyond becoming a physician. For students looking for alternatives, there are pathways that offer flexibility and accessibility.

Nursing continues to be in high demand, and many prospective students seek out easiest nursing schools to get into to jumpstart their careers with less competitive admissions processes. Some schools even offer lpn to rn programs without teas test, removing one of the most common entry barriers for aspiring nurses.

If you’re more interested in the administrative or technical side of healthcare, there are excellent options in the field of medical billing and coding. Many programs can be completed online and offer online medical billing and coding with financial aid for eligible students, making this a practical route to a stable career.

For those who aspire to lead and manage within healthcare organizations, many universities offer healthcare administration degrees that can be completed online at an accelerated pace. Each of these pathways offers unique ways to make a difference in healthcare—no matter your background or prior experience.

Best Scientists Citing Carlo Di Mario

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles