World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
6621
World Ranking
4507
National Ranking
1564

Paul A. Moore publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Moore sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 183 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Paul A. Moore D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul A. Moore is affiliated with Bowling Green State University in the United States. Their primary focus lies within the field of Environmental Science, with numerous contributions to related subfields such as Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research broadly centers on the biology and ecology of crustaceans and extends into the study of animal behavior and reproduction. They have also contributed to areas including marine and fisheries research, fish ecology and management studies, plant and animal studies, parasite biology and host interactions, and coral and marine ecosystems studies.

Paul A. Moore has published in several frequent venues, with the majority of work appearing in the following journals:

  • Journal of Crustacean Biology
  • Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Behaviour
  • Canadian Journal of Zoology
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • "Running away or running to? Do prey make decisions solely based on the landscape of fear or do they also include stimuli from a landscape of safety?" (2021), published in Journal of Experimental Biology
  • "Fine-tuned responses to chemical landscapes: crayfish use predator odors to assess threats based on relative size ratios" (2020), published in Ecosphere
  • "Differing behavioral changes in crayfish and bluegill under short- and long-chain PFAS exposures: Field study in Northern Michigan, USA" (2022), published in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • "Parasites differentially impact crayfish personality in different contexts" (2021), published in Behaviour
  • "Spatial, but not temporal, aspects of orientation are controlled by the fine-scale distribution of chemical cues in turbulent odor plumes" (2021), published in Journal of Experimental Biology

Their collaborative work frequently involves several coauthors, including:

  • Madison J. Wagner
  • Rebecca Noel MacKay
  • Tyler C. Wood
  • Daniela Flores Mosri
  • Jane Abrams

Best Publications

  • Field observations of intraspecific agonistic behavior of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and Orconectes virilis, in different habitats.

    Daniel A. Bergman;Paul A. Moore

  • Spatial Information in the Three-Dimensional Fine Structure of an Aquatic Odor Plume

    P. A. Moore;J. Atema

  • Solubility of inorganic phosphorus in stream water as influenced by pH and calcium concentration

    O.A. Diaz;K.R. Reddy;P.A. Moore

  • Chemical orientation of lobsters, homarus americanus, in turbulent odor plumes.

    Paul A. Moore;Nat Scholz;Jelle Atema

  • Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate

    Manuel Helbig;Manuel Helbig;James Michael Waddington;Pavel Alekseychik;Brian D. Amiro

  • INDIVIDUAL AND STATUS RECOGNITION IN THE CRAYFISH, ORCONECTES RUSTICUS: THE EFFECTS OF URINE RELEASE ON FIGHT DYNAMICS

    Rebecca A. Zulandt Schneider;Robert Huber;Paul A. Moore

  • Odor landscapes and animal behavior: tracking odor plumes in different physical worlds

    Paul Moore;John Crimaldi

  • Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, orconectes rusticus

    Daniel A. Bergman;Corinne P. Kozlowski;Jeremy C. Mcintyre;Robert Huber

  • Chemical orientation to food by the crayfish Orconectes rusticus: influence of hydrodynamics

    Paul A. Moore;Jennifer L. Grills

  • Recognition of Dominance Status By Chemoreception in the Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii

    Rebecca A. Zulandt Schneider;Robb W. S. Schneider;Paul A. Moore

  • Climate-change refugia in boreal North America: what, where, and for how long?

    Diana Stralberg;Dominique Arseneault;Jennifer L. Baltzer;Quinn E. Barber

  • PREVIOUS EXPERIENCES ALTER THE OUTCOME OF AGGRESSIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MALES IN THE CRAYFISH, PROCAMBARUS CLARKII

    Alisdair G. Daws;Jennifer Grills;Karen Konzen;Paul A. Moore

  • Spatial distribution of odors in simulated benthic boundary layer flows.

    Moore Pa;Weissburg Mj;Parrish Jm;Zimmer-Faust Rk

  • Urine as a source of conspecific disturbance signals in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii.

    R A Zulandt Schneider;P A Moore

  • Fluid dynamics and microscale chemical movement in the chemosensory appendages of the lobster, Homarus americanus

    Paul A. Moore;Paul A. Moore;Jelle Atema;Greg. A. Gerhardt

  • Dynamic Interactions of Behavior and Amine Neurochemistry in Acquisition and Maintenance of Social Rank in Crayfish

    R. Huber;J.B. Panksepp;Z. Yue;A. Delago

  • Hydrological controls on deep burning in a northern forested peatland

    Maxwell Curtis Lukenbach;Kelly Jean Hokanson;Kelly Jean Hokanson;Paul A. Moore;Kevin J. Devito

  • Prolonged exposure to social odours alters subsequent social interactions in crayfish (Orconectes rusticus)

    Daniel A. Bergman;Paul A. Moore

  • A model of a temporal filter in chemoreception to extract directional information from a turbulent odor plume

    Paul Moore;Jelle Atema

  • Physical constraints of chemoreception in foraging copepods

    Paul A. Moore;David M. Fields;Jeannette Yen

  • The Effects of the Herbicide Metolachlor on Agonistic Behavior in the Crayfish, Orconectes rusticus

    Michelle E. Cook;Paul A. Moore

  • Mitigating wildfire carbon loss in managed northern peatlands through restoration

    Gustaf Granath;Paul A. Moore;Maxwell C. Lukenbach;Maxwell C. Lukenbach;James M. Waddington

Frequent Co-Authors

Jelle Atema
Jelle Atema Boston University
Greg A. Gerhardt
Greg A. Gerhardt University of Kentucky
Marc J. Weissburg
Marc J. Weissburg Georgia Institute of Technology
Yuzo Ninomiya
Yuzo Ninomiya Kyushu University
Sergey M. Bezrukov
Sergey M. Bezrukov National Institutes of Health
Jerrold M. Olefsky
Jerrold M. Olefsky University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey R. Koseff
Jeffrey R. Koseff Stanford University
M. A. R. Koehl
M. A. R. Koehl University of California, Berkeley
Robert G. Wetzel
Robert G. Wetzel University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Matt Wachowiak
Matt Wachowiak University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse and fulfilling careers, but many students are also interested in complementary fields that use similar research or analytical skills. Online degree programs are becoming a popular option, allowing greater flexibility and access. For those passionate about psychology and its relationship to environmental issues, a master psychologie à distance can provide specialized knowledge while accommodating a busy schedule.

If you're interested in applying behavioral science to health and wellness, consider an online masters in clinical mental health counseling. This path prepares you for roles supporting individuals and communities, including environmental and conservation settings. Those drawn to the intersection of science and law will find that some of the highest paying forensic psychology jobs can benefit from ecological perspectives and research experience.

For students with a passion for youth and development, a masters in child psychology online can pave the way for impactful roles in education, counseling, or policy. No matter your direction, these related online degrees and career pathways offer practical opportunities to expand your knowledge and adapt your future career to evolving industries and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Moore

Trending Scientists