World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
14153
World Ranking
11874
National Ranking
5101

M. A. R. Koehl publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. A. R. Koehl sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 132 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

M. A. R. Koehl D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. A. R. Koehl sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. A. R. Koehl is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with notable contributions spanning subfields such as Oceanography, Ecology, Condensed Matter Physics, Molecular Biology, and Ocean Engineering.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Micro and Nano Robotics
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Protist diversity and phylogeny
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Diffusion and Search Dynamics
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research

M. A. R. Koehl has published multiple papers across various scientific journals. Some notable publications include:

  • "Selective factors in the evolution of multicellularity in choanoflagellates" (2020), Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution
  • "Ecological biomechanics of marine macrophytes" (2022), Journal of Experimental Botany

Other recent papers related to the general fields of study include:

  • "Surfing on Turbulence: A Strategy for Planktonic Navigation" (2022), Physical Review Letters
  • "The effect of external flow on the feeding currents of sessile microorganisms" (2021), Journal of The Royal Society Interface
  • "Does Formation of Multicellular Colonies by Choanoflagellates Affect Their Susceptibility to Capture by Passive Protozoan Predators?" (2020), Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology

The frequent publication venues for M. A. R. Koehl include:

  • Journal of Experimental Botany
  • Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
  • Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B Molecular and Developmental Evolution
  • Physical Review Letters
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Some of the frequent co-authors in their works are:

  • Nicholas Burnett
  • Rémi Monthiller
  • Aurore Loisy
  • Benjamin Favier
  • Christophe Eloy

Best Publications

  • How Animals Move: An Integrative View

    Michael H. Dickinson;Claire T. Farley;Robert J. Full;M. A. R. Koehl

  • Hurricane Allen's Impact on Jamaican Coral Reefs

    J. D. Woodley;E. A. Chornesky;P. A. Clifford;J. B. C. Jackson

  • The Mechanisms of Filter Feeding: Some Theoretical Considerations

    Daniel I. Rubenstein;M. A. R. Koehl

  • Mechanical Limits to Size in Wave-Swept Organisms

    Mark W. Denny;Thomas L. Daniel;M. A. R. Koehl

  • Copepod feeding currents: Food capture at low Reynolds number1

    M. A. R. Koehl;J. Rudi Strickier

  • WHEN DOES MORPHOLOGY MATTER

    M. A. R. Koehl

  • How Do Benthic Organisms Withstand Moving Water

    M. A. R. Koehl

  • Paddles and rakes: Fluid flow through bristled appendages of small organisms*

    A.Y.L. Cheer;M.A.R. Koehl

  • The mechanics of notochord elongation, straightening and stiffening in the embryo of Xenopus laevis.

    D.S. Adams;R. Keller;M.A. Koehl

  • Flow, flapping, and photosynthesis ofNereocystis leutkeana: a functional comparison of undulate and flat blade morphologies

    M. A. R. Koehl;R. S. Alberte

  • Mechanical adaptations of a giant kelp

    M. A. R. Koehl;S. A. Wainwright

  • How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination

    Lance A. Davidson;M. A. R. Koehl;Raymond Keller;George F. Oster

  • AERODYNAMICS, THERMOREGULATION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF INSECT WINGS: DIFFERENTIAL SCALING AND EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE.

    Joel G. Kingsolver;M. A. R. Koehl

  • Effects of Sea Anemones on the Flow Forces They Encounter

    M.A. R. Koehl

  • The fluid mechanics of arthropod sniffing in turbulent odor plumes.

    M.A.R. Koehl

  • How kelp produce blade shapes suited to different flow regimes: A new wrinkle

    M. A. R. Koehl;W. K. Silk;H. Liang;L. Mahadevan

  • Measurements of Mechanical Properties of the Blastula Wall Reveal Which Hypothesized Mechanisms of Primary Invagination Are Physically Plausible in the Sea UrchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratus

    L.A. Davidson;G.F. Oster;R.E. Keller;M.A.R. Koehl

  • Lobster Sniffing: Antennule Design and Hydrodynamic Filtering of Information in an Odor Plume

    M. A. R. Koehl;Jeffrey R. Koseff;John P. Crimaldi;Michael G. McCay

  • Predation on zooplankton by the benthic anthozoans Alcyonium siderium (Alcyonacea) and Metridium senile (Actiniaria) in the New England subtidal

    K. P. Sebens;M. A. R. Koehl

  • Sniffing by a silkworm moth: wing fanning enhances air penetration through and pheromone interception by antennae.

    Catherine Loudon;M. A. R. Koehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Keller
Ray Keller University of Virginia
Michael G. Hadfield
Michael G. Hadfield University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jeffrey R. Koseff
Jeffrey R. Koseff Stanford University
Joel G. Kingsolver
Joel G. Kingsolver University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Mark W. Denny
Mark W. Denny Stanford University
Robert J. Full
Robert J. Full University of California, Berkeley
Robert Dudley
Robert Dudley University of California, Berkeley
George Oster
George Oster University of California, Berkeley
Roman Stocker
Roman Stocker ETH Zurich
Wendy Kuhn Silk
Wendy Kuhn Silk University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of biology and biochemistry offers a diverse range of career options, now more accessible than ever through online education. Online biology degrees are ideal for those wanting flexibility while gaining skills for roles in research, healthcare, or education. These programs are designed for both recent graduates and professionals seeking to advance or pivot their careers.

Another popular path is pursuing an online asn program. This can be a gateway to becoming a registered nurse, blending biological science with patient care. For those interested in nutrition and health, an online degree in nutrition provides specialized knowledge in dietetics, wellness, and public health – essential for roles in clinical or community settings.

For students aiming for leadership, a cahme accredited mha programs offers advanced study in health administration, opening doors to upper-level management in hospitals and healthcare organizations. Whichever path you choose, online programs provide flexible and accredited routes to success in science and healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing M. A. R. Koehl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles