World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
15978
World Ranking
14811
National Ranking
6196

Birgit Funke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Birgit Funke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 116 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Birgit Funke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Birgit Funke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Birgit Funke is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant focus on medicine.

The main fields of study represented in their work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Their research spans several subfields such as:

  • Genetics
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cancer Research
  • Developmental Neuroscience

The main topics covered by their publications are:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Congenital heart defects research

Birgit Funke has published articles in several venues, most frequently in:

  • Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Circulation
  • Genetics in Medicine Open

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Reevaluating the Genetic Contribution of Monogenic Dilated Cardiomyopathy, 2020, Circulation
  • Frequency of genomic secondary findings among 21,915 eMERGE network participants, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Systematic large-scale assessment of the genetic architecture of left ventricular noncompaction reveals diverse etiologies, 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • The penetrance of rare variants in cardiomyopathy-associated genes: A cross-sectional approach to estimating penetrance for secondary findings, 2023, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Laboratory perspectives in the development of polygenic risk scores for disease: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2023, Genetics in Medicine

Collaborations have been a notable aspect of their research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • James S. Ware
  • Megan Hawley
  • Kate Thomson
  • Paul J.R. Barton
  • Stuart A. Cook

Best Publications

  • TBX1 Is Responsible for Cardiovascular Defects in Velo-Cardio-Facial/DiGeorge Syndrome

    Sandra Merscher;Birgit Funke;Jonathan A. Epstein;Joerg Heyer

  • ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing.

    Heidi L. Rehm;Sherri J. Bale;Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir;Jonathan S. Berg

  • Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities

    Arjun K. Manrai;Birgit H. Funke;Heidi L. Rehm;Morten S. Olesen

  • Reassessment of Mendelian gene pathogenicity using 7,855 cardiomyopathy cases and 60,706 reference samples

    Roddy Walsh;Kate L. Thomson;James S. Ware;James S. Ware;Birgit H. Funke

  • A Common Molecular Basis for Rearrangement Disorders on Chromosome 22q11

    Lisa Edelmann;Raj K. Pandita;Elizabeth Spiteri;Birgit Funke

  • Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice

    Amy S Gargis;Lisa Kalman;Meredith W Berry;David P Bick

  • Best practices for benchmarking germline small-variant calls in human genomes.

    Peter Krusche;Len Trigg;Paul C Boutros;Christopher E Mason

  • Cardiovascular Pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria: Correlation With the Vascular Pathology of Aging

    Michelle Olive;Ingrid Harten;Richard Mitchell;Jeanette K. Beers

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • Results of clinical genetic testing of 2,912 probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: expanded panels offer limited additional sensitivity

    Ahmed A. Alfares;Ahmed A. Alfares;Melissa A. Kelly;Gregory McDermott;Birgit H. Funke;Birgit H. Funke;Birgit H. Funke

  • Using high-resolution variant frequencies to empower clinical genome interpretation

    Nicola Whiffin;Nicola Whiffin;Eric Minikel;Eric Minikel;Roddy Walsh;Roddy Walsh;Anne H O’Donnell-Luria;Anne H O’Donnell-Luria

  • Adaptation and validation of the ACMG/AMP variant classification framework for MYH7-associated inherited cardiomyopathies: recommendations by ClinGen’s Inherited Cardiomyopathy Expert Panel

    Melissa A Kelly;Colleen Caleshu;Ana Morales;Jillian Buchan

  • The landscape of genetic variation in dilated cardiomyopathy as surveyed by clinical DNA sequencing

    Trevor J. Pugh;Melissa A. Kelly;Sivakumar Gowrisankar;Elizabeth Hynes

  • College of American pathologists' laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests

    Nazneen Aziz;Qin Zhao;Lynn Bry;Denise K. Driscoll

  • Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Genes

    Jodie Ingles;Jodie Ingles;Jennifer Goldstein;Courtney Thaxton;Colleen Caleshu

  • Inherited Cardiomyopathies Molecular Genetics and Clinical Genetic Testing in the Postgenomic Era

    Polakit Teekakirikul;Polakit Teekakirikul;Melissa A. Kelly;Heidi L. Rehm;Heidi L. Rehm;Neal K. Lakdawala

  • Genetic variation in DTNBP1 influences general cognitive ability

    Katherine E. Burdick;Todd Lencz;Birgit Funke;Christine T. Finn

  • Association of the DTNBP1 locus with schizophrenia in a U.S. population.

    Birgit Funke;Christine T. Finn;Alex M. Plocik;Stephen Lake

  • Navigating highly homologous genes in a molecular diagnostic setting: a resource for clinical next-generation sequencing.

    Diana Mandelker;Diana Mandelker;Ryan J. Schmidt;Arunkanth Ankala;Kristin McDonald Gibson;Kristin McDonald Gibson

  • Defining the genetic architecture of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: re-evaluating the role of non-sarcomeric genes

    Roddy Walsh;Roddy Walsh;Rachel Buchan;Rachel Buchan;Alicja Wilk;Alicja Wilk;Shibu John;Shibu John

Frequent Co-Authors

Heidi L. Rehm
Heidi L. Rehm Brigham and Women's Hospital
Raju Kucherlapati
Raju Kucherlapati Harvard University
Bernice E. Morrow
Bernice E. Morrow Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Christine E. Seidman
Christine E. Seidman Harvard University
Stuart A. Cook
Stuart A. Cook Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Paul J.R. Barton
Paul J.R. Barton Imperial College London
Anil K. Malhotra
Anil K. Malhotra Hofstra University
Raj K. Pandita
Raj K. Pandita Houston Methodist
Ray E. Hershberger
Ray E. Hershberger The Ohio State University
Hugh Watkins
Hugh Watkins University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re inspired to study Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, there are several flexible academic and career options to consider. Many students now opt for online degrees to balance studies with work or personal commitments. For those aiming to enter healthcare support roles, a medical assistant to lpn bridge program can be an efficient route to advance your clinical skills and boost your earning potential.

Students interested in a broader science foundation can pursue a biology degree online, often available in accelerated formats. These allow for quick progression and can open doors to lab work or further study. Nursing remains a popular and high-demand path; online associate rn programs offer a flexible and accessible entry into this essential field.

The growing field of nutritional science also provides opportunities to make a real impact on public health. Find options for career-focused study with the best online nutrition degree programs. Exploring these pathways can help you choose an online degree that matches your interests, schedule, and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Birgit Funke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles