World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
13874
World Ranking
6054
National Ranking
353

Rhonda Craven publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhonda Craven sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 269 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Rhonda Craven D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rhonda Craven sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rhonda Craven is affiliated with the Australian Catholic University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with specific attention to Education, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, and Sociology and Political Science as subfields.

Their work focuses on several prominent topics, including:

  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Indigenous and Place-Based Education

Rhonda Craven has published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • British Educational Research Journal
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Educational Psychology Review

Key recent papers by Rhonda Craven include:

  • "A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction at Work in an Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australian Sample Across Occupation Types," 2022, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
  • "Overcoming Limitations in Peer-Victimization Research That Impede Successful Intervention: Challenges and New Directions," 2023, PubMed
  • "Empowering the voices and agency of Indigenous Australian youth and their wellbeing in higher education," 2021, International Journal of Educational Research
  • "Boarding schools: A longitudinal examination of Australian Indigenous and non-Indigenous boarders' and non-boarders' wellbeing," 2022, British Educational Research Journal
  • "Self-concept a game changer for academic success for high-achieving Australian Indigenous and non-Indigenous students: Reciprocal effects between self-concept and achievement," 2022, Contemporary Educational Psychology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Alexandre J. S. Morin
  • Danielle Tracey
  • Christophe Maïano
  • Janet Mooney
  • Cynthia Gagnon

Best Publications

  • Reciprocal Effects of Self-Concept and Performance From a Multidimensional Perspective: Beyond Seductive Pleasure and Unidimensional Perspectives:

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven

  • Self-Concepts of Young Children 5 to 8 Years of Age: Measurement and Multidimensional Structure

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven;Raymond Debus

  • Do Self-Concept Interventions Make a Difference? A Synergistic Blend of Construct Validation and Meta-Analysis

    Alison J. O'Mara;Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven;Raymond L. Debus

  • The Big-fish–little-pond-effect Stands Up to Critical Scrutiny: Implications for Theory, Methodology, and Future Research

    Herbert Warren Marsh;Marjorie Seaton;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Ludtke

  • Structure, Stability, and Development of Young Children's Self-Concepts: A Multicohort–Multioccasion Study

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda Craven;Raymond Debus

  • The Effects of Gifted and Talented Programs on Academic Self-Concept: The Big Fish Strikes Again

    Herbert W. Marsh;Danuta Chessor;Rhonda Craven;Lawrence Roche

  • Academic Self-Concept: Beyond The Dustbowl

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda Craven

  • How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unraveling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Louise A. Ellis;Rhonda G. Craven

  • Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept

    Rhonda G. Craven;Herbert W. Marsh;Raymond L. Debus

  • Causal modeling of self-concept, job satisfaction, and retention of nurses

    Leanne S. Cowin;Maree Johnson;Maree Johnson;Rhonda Gai Craven;Herbert Warren Marsh;Herbert Warren Marsh

  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Jiesi Guo;Theresa Dicke;Philip D. Parker

  • Earning Its Place as a Pan-Human Theory: Universality of the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect across 41 Culturally and Economically Diverse Countries.

    Marjorie Seaton;Herbert Warren Marsh;Rhonda Gai Craven

  • Construct Validity of the Multidimensional Structure of Bullying and Victimization: An Application of Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Benjamin Nagengast;Alexandre J. S. Morin;Roberto H. Parada

  • Evaluation of the Big-Two-Factor Theory of Academic Motivation Orientations: An Evaluation of Jingle-Jangle Fallacies

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven;John W. Hinkley;Raymond L. Debus

  • The centrality of the self-concept construct for psychological wellbeing and unlocking human potential: Implications for child and educational psychologists

    Rhonda G. Craven;Herbert W. Marsh

  • Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect Generalizability and Moderation—Two Sides of the Same Coin

    Marjorie Seaton;Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven

  • The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept : domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components

    A. Katrin Arens;Alexander Seeshing Yeung;Rhonda G. Craven;Marcus Hasselhorn

  • The reciprocal relations between self-concept, motivation and achievement: juxtaposing academic self-concept and achievement goal orientations for mathematics success

    Marjorie Seaton;Philip Parker;Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven

  • Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda Craven;Raymond Debus

  • The Pivotal Role of Frames of Reference in Academic Self-Concept Formation: The "Big Fish-Little Pond" Effect.

    Herbert W. Marsh;Rhonda G. Craven

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert W. Marsh
Herbert W. Marsh Australian Catholic University
Alexander Seeshing Yeung
Alexander Seeshing Yeung Australian Catholic University
Andrew J. Martin
Andrew J. Martin University of New South Wales
Philip D. Parker
Philip D. Parker Australian Catholic University
Dennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney Education University of Hong Kong
Alexandre J. S. Morin
Alexandre J. S. Morin Concordia University
Paul C. Burnett
Paul C. Burnett Queensland University of Technology
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Joseph Ciarrochi
Joseph Ciarrochi Australian Catholic University
Kit-Tai Hau
Kit-Tai Hau Chinese University of Hong Kong

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various related careers and educational opportunities. Many students interested in psychology also consider paths in social work, counseling, and mental health services. These fields are in high demand, and acquiring an online degree can provide both flexibility and value.

When exploring online degree options, it’s important to choose programs with proven value and strong outcomes. To help guide your search, consider the most valuable online social work programs in Connecticut or explore what’s offered by the most valuable online social work degree programs in Dubuque. Both can lead to fulfilling careers supporting individuals and communities.

Additionally, students in the Midwest may look into the most valuable online social work degrees in Indiana and the most valuable online social work programs in Kansas. These programs offer specialized coursework and practical training for impactful roles in healthcare, education, and social services.

By selecting a reputable online degree, you can build a strong foundation for diverse career pathways connected to psychology—ensuring a rewarding and flexible future.

Best Scientists Citing Rhonda Craven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles