World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
86
Citations
29897
World Ranking
1284
National Ranking
47

F. Fazio publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 455 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

F. Fazio D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Fazio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

F. Fazio is affiliated with the University of Milano-Bicocca in Italy. Their research activities primarily focus on medical fields, with a concentration on surgery. Additional interests include genetics and oncology as subfields.

The scientist's recent publications address clinical issues related to stoma care, enhanced recovery protocols, and inflammatory bowel disease. Two papers published in 2024 illustrate these focuses:

  • How to dramatically reduce dehydration related readmission in patients undergoing restorative surgery with diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (2024, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN)
  • How to dramatically reduce dehydration-related readmission in patients undergoing restorative surgery with diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis (2024, Techniques in Coloproctology)

Their main research topics are:

  • Stoma care and complications
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

F. Fazio frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Michela Mineccia, Paolo Massucco, Simona Dagatti, August J. Valenti, and D. Vassallo. These collaborations reflect shared interests and joint contributions mainly in surgical and clinical nutrition research contexts.

The scientist's work appears across notable venues such as Clinical Nutrition ESPEN and Techniques in Coloproctology, indicating engagement with professional communities targeting surgical care and clinical nutrition advancements.

Best Publications

  • Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution

    G. Rizzolatti;L. Fadiga;M. Matelli;V. Bettinardi

  • Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy.

    J Decety;J Grèzes;N Costes;D Perani

  • Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography

    Jean Decety;D. Perani;Marc Jeannerod;V. Bettinardi

  • The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language.

    Daniela Perani;Eraldo Paulesu;Nuria Sebastian Galles;Emmanuel Dupoux

  • Discrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG PET

    Karl Herholz;Eric Salmon;Daniela Perani;Jean-Claude Baron

  • A cultural effect on brain function.

    Eraldo Paulesu;Eamon McCrory;Ferruccio Fazio;L. Menoncello

  • Brain processing of native and foreign languages.

    Daniela Perani;Stanislas Dehaene;Franco Grassi;Laurent Cohen

  • The role of age of acquisition and language usage in early, high-proficient bilinguals: an fMRI study during verbal fluency

    Daniela Perani;Jubin Abutalebi;Eraldo Paulesu;Simona Brambati

  • Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET

    G. Rizzolatti;L. Fadiga;M. Matelli;V. Bettinardi

  • Syntax and the brain: disentangling grammar by selective anomalies.

    A. Moro;M. Tettamanti;D. Perani;C. Donati

  • Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools.

    D. Perani;S. F. Cappa;V. Bettinardi;S. Bressi

  • A modified damped Richardson–Lucy algorithm to reduce isotropic background effects in spherical deconvolution

    Flavio Dell'Acqua;Paola Scifo;Giovanna Rizzo;Marco Catani

  • Heterogeneity of brain glucose metabolism in mild cognitive impairment and clinical progression to alzheimer disease

    Davide Anchisi;Barbara Borroni;Massimo Franceschi;Nasser Kerrouche

  • Rapid Assessment of Regional Cerebral Metabolic Abnormalities in Single Subjects with Quantitative and Nonquantitative [18F]FDG PET: A Clinical Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping

    M. Signorini;E. Paulesu;K. Friston;D. Perani

  • Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects

    Daniela Perani;Tatiana Schnur;Marco Tettamanti;Marilu Gorno-Tempini

  • Functional heterogeneity of left inferior frontal cortex as revealed by fMRI.

    Eraldo Paulesu;Ben Goldacre;Paola Scifo;Stefano F. Cappa

  • Acupuncture produces central activations in pain regions.

    Gabriele E. M. Biella;Maria Luisa Sotgiu;Giulio Pellegata;Eraldo Paulesu

  • Education and occupation as proxies for reserve in aMCI converters and AD: FDG-PET evidence

    V. Garibotto;B. Borroni;E. Kalbe;K. Herholz

  • Nonuniformity in myocardial accumulation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in normal fasted humans.

    G Fragasso;G Lucignani;F Fazio

  • In vivo PET study of 5HT(2A) serotonin and D(2) dopamine dysfunction in drug-naive obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Daniela Perani;Valentina Garibotto;Alessandra Gorini;Rosa Maria Moresco

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniela Perani
Daniela Perani Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Eraldo Paulesu
Eraldo Paulesu University of Milano-Bicocca
Stefano F. Cappa
Stefano F. Cappa Istituto Universitario Di Studi Superiori Di Pavia
Paola Scifo
Paola Scifo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Marco Tettamanti
Marco Tettamanti University of Milano-Bicocca
Cristina Colombo
Cristina Colombo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
V. Di Carlo
V. Di Carlo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Claudio Cobelli
Claudio Cobelli University of Padua
Angelo Antonini
Angelo Antonini University of Padua
Enrico Smeraldi
Enrico Smeraldi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a range of related online degrees and professional pathways. Many students leverage their neuroscience background to pursue advanced degrees in mental health, social work, or counseling, expanding their career options in healthcare, research, or education.

If your interest extends into social services, consider a 1 year online master's in social work. This option enables quick entry into social work roles where you can apply your knowledge of the brain and behavior.

Those interested in a psychological approach may opt for an accelerated psychology degree, allowing you to build on neuroscience foundations and transition to roles in mental health, assessment, or therapy.

For a clinical focus, explore cacrep accredited programs online, which meet essential licensure requirements for future counselors. You could also look into online masters counseling programs for a cost-effective pathway into private practice, school, or rehabilitation counseling.

These flexible, online programs help neuroscience graduates and enthusiasts transition smoothly into in-demand, people-oriented careers.

Best Scientists Citing F. Fazio

Trending Scientists