World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
94
Citations
33786
World Ranking
2002
National Ranking
1091

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
33788
World Ranking
10457
National Ranking
5381

Nadia Rosenthal publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 297 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nadia Rosenthal D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Rosenthal sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadia Rosenthal is a researcher primarily affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work spans multiple domains within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to molecular biology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, genetics, and immunology.

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics, including cardiac fibrosis and remodeling, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, pancreatic function and diabetes, genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, congenital heart defects research, and viral infections and immunology research.

Nadia Rosenthal co-authors frequently with several collaborators, including Elvira Forte, Randy Strong, Richard A. Miller, Candice N. Baker, and Olivia Bedard. Their publications appear mainly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), GeroScience, Circulation, Nature Communications, and Aging Cell.

Some notable recent papers include:

  • Fibroblasts: Origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease (2021, Cell)
  • Single cell sequencing reveals endothelial plasticity with transient mesenchymal activation after myocardial infarction (2021, Nature Communications)
  • High-Resolution Transcriptomic Profiling of the Heart During Chronic Stress Reveals Cellular Drivers of Cardiac Fibrosis and Hypertrophy (2020, Circulation)
  • Dynamic Interstitial Cell Response during Myocardial Infarction Predicts Resilience to Rupture in Genetically Diverse Mice (2020, Cell Reports)
  • Targeting immune-fibroblast cell communication in heart failure (2024, Nature)

Best Publications

  • Localized Igf-1 transgene expression sustains hypertrophy and regeneration in senescent skeletal muscle

    Antonio Musarò;Karl McCullagh;Angelika Paul;Leslie Houghton

  • Revisiting Cardiac Cellular Composition

    Alexander R. Pinto;Alexei Ilinykh;Malina J. Ivey;Jill T. Kuwabara

  • Viral mediated expression of insulin-like growth factor I blocks the aging-related loss of skeletal muscle function

    Elisabeth R. Barton-Davis;Daria I. Shoturma;Antonio Musaro;Nadia Rosenthal

  • IGF-1 induces skeletal myocyte hypertrophy through calcineurin in association with GATA-2 and NF-ATc1

    Antonio Musarò;Karl J. A. McCullagh;Francisco J. Naya;Eric N. Olson

  • Macrophages are required for adult salamander limb regeneration

    James W. Godwin;Alexander R. Pinto;Nadia A. Rosenthal;Nadia A. Rosenthal

  • A CREB-C/EBPbeta cascade induces M2 macrophage-specific gene expression and promotes muscle injury repair.

    Daniela Ruffell;Foteini Mourkioti;Adriana Gambardella;Peggy Kirstetter

  • Preparing the ground for tissue regeneration: from mechanism to therapy

    Stuart J Forbes;Nadia Alicia Rosenthal

  • Identification of regulatory elements of cloned genes with functional assays.

    Nadia Rosenthal

  • Myf-6, a new member of the human gene family of myogenic determination factors: evidence for a gene cluster on chromosome 12.

    T. Braun;E. Bober;B. Winter;N. Rosenthal

  • Muscle-specific expression of insulin-like growth factor I counters muscle decline in mdx mice.

    Elisabeth R. Barton;Linda Morris;Antonio Musaro;Nadia Rosenthal

  • Fibroblasts: Origins, definitions, and functions in health and disease.

    Maksim V. Plikus;Xiaojie Wang;Sarthak Sinha;Elvira Forte

  • The structure and evolution of the two nonallelic rat preproinsulin genes

    Peter Lomedico;Nadia Rosenthal;Argiris Efstratiadis;Walter Gilbert

  • Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity.

    Gabriella Dobrowolny;Michela Aucello;Emanuele Rizzuto;Sara Beccafico

  • The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models.

    Nadia Alicia Rosenthal;Steve Brown

  • Progressive replacement of embryo-derived cardiac macrophages with age

    Kaaweh Molawi;Yochai Wolf;Prashanth K. Kandalla;Jeremy Favret;Jeremy Favret;Jeremy Favret

  • Muscle-specific expression of IGF-1 blocks angiotensin II–induced skeletal muscle wasting

    Yao-Hua Song;Yangxin Li;Jie Du;William E. Mitch

  • Muscle expression of a local Igf-1 isoform protects motor neurons in an ALS mouse model

    Gabriella Dobrowolny;Cristina Giacinti;Laura Pelosi;Carmine Nicoletti

  • MicroRNA-29 in Aortic Dilation: Implications for Aneurysm Formation

    Reinier A. Boon;Timon Seeger;Susanne Heydt;Ariane Fischer

  • Proliferation precedes differentiation in IGF-I-stimulated myogenesis.

    James C. Engert;Erick B. Berglund;Nadia Rosenthal

  • Targeted ablation of IKK2 improves skeletal muscle strength, maintains mass, and promotes regeneration

    Foteini Mourkioti;Paschalis Kratsios;Tom Luedde;Yao Hua Song

Frequent Co-Authors

Damian Smedley
Damian Smedley Queen Mary University of London
Richard P. Harvey
Richard P. Harvey Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute
Paul N. Schofield
Paul N. Schofield University of Cambridge
John M. Hancock
John M. Hancock Norwich University
Paul J.R. Barton
Paul J.R. Barton Imperial College London
Robert Lanza
Robert Lanza Astellas Pharma (Japan)
Argiris Efstratiadis
Argiris Efstratiadis Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens
Magdi H. Yacoub
Magdi H. Yacoub Imperial College London
Janan T. Eppig
Janan T. Eppig Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory
Steve D.M. Brown
Steve D.M. Brown Medical Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are passionate about Biology or Biochemistry, there are several online degree options that can expand your expertise and career opportunities. As healthcare, research, and fitness industries evolve, professionals with diverse scientific backgrounds are in high demand.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, consider enrolling in one of the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs. A degree in this field prepares you for upper-level roles in hospitals, healthcare companies, or government agencies.

If your goal is to work in pharmaceuticals, an online pharmd is an excellent pathway. This advanced program opens the door to clinical positions, research, and specialized pharmacy careers.

Interested in health, fitness, and human performance? Explore an exercise science and nutrition degree online to build a foundation in physiology, athletic training, and wellness coaching.

For a broader look at movement science, an online bachelor's in kinesiology combines biology, biomechanics, and fitness, preparing you for roles in physical therapy, sports management, or health education.

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Rosenthal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles