World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
29691
World Ranking
14509
National Ranking
7339

Timothy L. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 376 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Timothy L. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy L. Smith is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant number of publications in surgery, otorhinolaryngology, immunology and allergy, sensory systems, and general health professions.

The scientist has produced 217 publications in medicine, including 71 focused on surgery and 64 in otorhinolaryngology. Other notable subfields include immunology and allergy with 26 publications, sensory systems with 23, and general health professions with 9.

Key topics addressed in their work include sinusitis and nasal conditions, nasal surgery and airway studies, head and neck surgical oncology, allergic rhinitis and sensitization, olfactory and sensory function studies, ear and head tumors, and cystic fibrosis research advances.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Timothy L. Smith are:

  • Jess C. Mace (54 publications)
  • Zachary M. Soler (39 publications)
  • Rodney J. Schlosser (38 publications)
  • Daniel M. Beswick (32 publications)
  • Mathew Geltzeiler (31 publications)

They have published mainly in the following venues:

  • International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (53 publications)
  • The Laryngoscope (14 publications)
  • American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (6 publications)
  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base (4 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (4 publications)

Some recent papers by Timothy L. Smith include:

  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021, 2020, published in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction, 2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • A comparative analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologics for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, 2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • Clinical Research Needs for the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the New Era of Biologics: A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop, 2020, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • Predictors of survival outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 2020, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

Timothy L. Smith has also contributed to book publications, including a volume published by PONTES EDITORES eBooks titled Literaturas de Língua Inglesa: leituras interdisciplinares - Volume X scheduled for 2025.

Best Publications

  • European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020

    Wytske J. Fokkens;Valerie J. Lund;Joachim Mullol;Claus Bachert

  • Clinical practice guideline: Adult sinusitis

    Richard M. Rosenfeld;David Andes;Neil Bhattacharyya;Dickson Cheung

  • Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

    Michael G. Stewart;David L. Witsell;Timothy L. Smith;Edward M. Weaver

  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

    Richard R. Orlandi;Todd T. Kingdom;Timothy L. Smith;Benjamin Bleier

  • International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

    Sarah K. Wise;Sandra Y. Lin;Elina Toskala;Richard R. Orlandi

  • Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study ☆

    Michael G Stewart;Timothy L Smith;Edward M Weaver;David L Witsell

  • Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

    Timothy L. Smith;Sabrina Mendolia-Loffredo;Todd A. Loehrl;Rodney Sparapani

  • Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

    Adam S. DeConde;Jess C. Mace;Joshua Michael Levy;Luke Rudmik

  • Determinants of outcomes of sinus surgery: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study

    Timothy L. Smith;Jamie R. Litvack;Peter H. Hwang;Todd A. Loehrl

  • Impact of mucosal eosinophilia and nasal polyposis on quality-of-life outcomes after sinus surgery.

    Zachary M. Soler;David Sauer;Jess Mace;Timothy L. Smith

  • Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

    Zachary M. Soler;Eve Wittenberg;Rodney J. Schlosser;Jess C. Mace

  • Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Luke Rudmik;Timothy L. Smith;Rodney J. Schlosser;Peter H. Hwang

  • Relationship between clinical measures and histopathologic findings in chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Zachary M. Soler;David A. Sauer;Jess Mace;Timothy L. Smith

  • Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid‐eluting sinus stent

    Andrew H. Murr;Timothy L. Smith;Peter H. Hwang;Neil Bhattacharyya

  • SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Adam S. DeConde;Jess C. Mace;Todd Bodner;Peter H. Hwang

  • An Evolution in the Management of Sinonasal Inverting Papilloma

    Joseph K. Han;Timothy L. Smith;Todd Loehrl;Robert J. Toohill

  • Early postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations†

    Luke Rudmik;Zachary M. Soler;Richard R. Orlandi;Michael G. Stewart

  • The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS)

    Peter John Wormald;Werner Hoseman;Claudio Callejas;Rainer K. Weber

  • Impact of tobacco smoke on chronic rhinosinusitis: a review of the literature.

    Douglas D. Reh;Thomas S. Higgins;Timothy L. Smith

  • Topical therapies in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: an evidence‐based review with recommendations

    Luke Rudmik;Monica Hoy;Rodney J. Schlosser;Richard J. Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodney J. Schlosser
Rodney J. Schlosser Medical University of South Carolina
Neil Bhattacharyya
Neil Bhattacharyya Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Robert C. Kern
Robert C. Kern Northwestern University
Todd Bodner
Todd Bodner Portland State University
Claus Bachert
Claus Bachert Karolinska Institute
Elina Toskala
Elina Toskala Thomas Jefferson University
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Richard M. Rosenfeld SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Anju T. Peters
Anju T. Peters Northwestern University
De Yun Wang
De Yun Wang National University of Singapore
Fuad M. Baroody
Fuad M. Baroody University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore your options for studying Medicine in the USA, it’s worth considering related online degrees that can expand your career possibilities in healthcare. For individuals interested in healthcare leadership and management, learning how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is essential. Factors like accreditation, curriculum flexibility, and industry reputation play a vital role when choosing an MHA program.

Many registered nurses looking to upskill are drawn to flexible pathways such as rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which allow busy nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree without additional in-person requirements. Those seeking the highest nursing credentials may be interested in a 1 year dnp program online, helping professionals advance quickly in leadership or specialized clinical roles.

If you’re aiming for a streamlined path to a doctoral degree, exploring easiest online dnp programs could be ideal, offering manageable coursework and flexible schedules. With so many online options, students can tailor their learning to meet career goals in medicine and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles