World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14508 13662 7338 6792 376 29691

Timothy L. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timothy L. Smith between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timothy L. Smith published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2016. 37 of the 418 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2016. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 17 publications
1982 2025

418 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timothy L. Smith: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 4
2001 12
2002 8
2003 9
2004 10
2005 12
2006 9
2007 13
2008 18
2009 14
2010 16
2011 16
2012 21
2013 14
2014 20
2015 25
2016 28
2017 20
2018 18
2019 20
2020 18
2021 27
2022 13
2023 12
2024 20
2025 17
Total 418
Download as CSV

Timothy L. Smith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 376 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 376
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Timothy L. Smith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy L. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Timothy L. Smith is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant number of publications in surgery, otorhinolaryngology, immunology and allergy, sensory systems, and general health professions.

The scientist has produced 217 publications in medicine, including 71 focused on surgery and 64 in otorhinolaryngology. Other notable subfields include immunology and allergy with 26 publications, sensory systems with 23, and general health professions with 9.

Key topics addressed in their work include sinusitis and nasal conditions, nasal surgery and airway studies, head and neck surgical oncology, allergic rhinitis and sensitization, olfactory and sensory function studies, ear and head tumors, and cystic fibrosis research advances.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Timothy L. Smith are:

  • Jess C. Mace (54 publications)
  • Zachary M. Soler (39 publications)
  • Rodney J. Schlosser (38 publications)
  • Daniel M. Beswick (32 publications)
  • Mathew Geltzeiler (31 publications)

They have published mainly in the following venues:

  • International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (53 publications)
  • The Laryngoscope (14 publications)
  • American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (6 publications)
  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base (4 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (4 publications)

Some recent papers by Timothy L. Smith include:

  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021, 2020, published in International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction, 2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • A comparative analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologics for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, 2022, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
  • Clinical Research Needs for the Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps in the New Era of Biologics: A National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Workshop, 2020, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • Predictors of survival outcomes in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 2020, International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

Timothy L. Smith has also contributed to book publications, including a volume published by PONTES EDITORES eBooks titled Literaturas de Língua Inglesa: leituras interdisciplinares - Volume X scheduled for 2025.

Best Publications

  • European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020

    Wytske J. Fokkens;Valerie J. Lund;Joachim Mullol;Claus Bachert

  • Clinical practice guideline: Adult sinusitis

    Richard M. Rosenfeld;David Andes;Neil Bhattacharyya;Dickson Cheung

  • Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.

    Michael G. Stewart;David L. Witsell;Timothy L. Smith;Edward M. Weaver

  • International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

    Richard R. Orlandi;Todd T. Kingdom;Timothy L. Smith;Benjamin Bleier

  • International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.

    Sarah K. Wise;Sandra Y. Lin;Elina Toskala;Richard R. Orlandi

  • Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study ☆

    Michael G Stewart;Timothy L Smith;Edward M Weaver;David L Witsell

  • Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

    Timothy L. Smith;Sabrina Mendolia-Loffredo;Todd A. Loehrl;Rodney Sparapani

  • Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.

    Adam S. DeConde;Jess C. Mace;Joshua Michael Levy;Luke Rudmik

  • Determinants of outcomes of sinus surgery: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study

    Timothy L. Smith;Jamie R. Litvack;Peter H. Hwang;Todd A. Loehrl

  • Impact of mucosal eosinophilia and nasal polyposis on quality-of-life outcomes after sinus surgery.

    Zachary M. Soler;David Sauer;Jess Mace;Timothy L. Smith

  • Health state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.

    Zachary M. Soler;Eve Wittenberg;Rodney J. Schlosser;Jess C. Mace

  • Productivity costs in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Luke Rudmik;Timothy L. Smith;Rodney J. Schlosser;Peter H. Hwang

  • Relationship between clinical measures and histopathologic findings in chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Zachary M. Soler;David A. Sauer;Jess Mace;Timothy L. Smith

  • Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid‐eluting sinus stent

    Andrew H. Murr;Timothy L. Smith;Peter H. Hwang;Neil Bhattacharyya

  • SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis.

    Adam S. DeConde;Jess C. Mace;Todd Bodner;Peter H. Hwang

  • An Evolution in the Management of Sinonasal Inverting Papilloma

    Joseph K. Han;Timothy L. Smith;Todd Loehrl;Robert J. Toohill

  • Early postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations†

    Luke Rudmik;Zachary M. Soler;Richard R. Orlandi;Michael G. Stewart

  • The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) and Classification of the Extent of Endoscopic Frontal Sinus Surgery (EFSS)

    Peter John Wormald;Werner Hoseman;Claudio Callejas;Rainer K. Weber

  • Impact of tobacco smoke on chronic rhinosinusitis: a review of the literature.

    Douglas D. Reh;Thomas S. Higgins;Timothy L. Smith

  • Topical therapies in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: an evidence‐based review with recommendations

    Luke Rudmik;Monica Hoy;Rodney J. Schlosser;Richard J. Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodney J. Schlosser
Rodney J. Schlosser Medical University of South Carolina
Neil Bhattacharyya
Neil Bhattacharyya Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Robert C. Kern
Robert C. Kern Northwestern University
Todd Bodner
Todd Bodner Portland State University
Claus Bachert
Claus Bachert Karolinska Institute
Elina Toskala
Elina Toskala Thomas Jefferson University
Richard M. Rosenfeld
Richard M. Rosenfeld SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Anju T. Peters
Anju T. Peters Northwestern University
De Yun Wang
De Yun Wang National University of Singapore
Fuad M. Baroody
Fuad M. Baroody University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore your options for studying Medicine in the USA, it’s worth considering related online degrees that can expand your career possibilities in healthcare. For individuals interested in healthcare leadership and management, learning how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs is essential. Factors like accreditation, curriculum flexibility, and industry reputation play a vital role when choosing an MHA program.

Many registered nurses looking to upskill are drawn to flexible pathways such as rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which allow busy nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree without additional in-person requirements. Those seeking the highest nursing credentials may be interested in a 1 year dnp program online, helping professionals advance quickly in leadership or specialized clinical roles.

If you’re aiming for a streamlined path to a doctoral degree, exploring easiest online dnp programs could be ideal, offering manageable coursework and flexible schedules. With so many online options, students can tailor their learning to meet career goals in medicine and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy L. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles