World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
10903
World Ranking
13292
National Ranking
1038

Paul N. Schofield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul N. Schofield sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 229 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul N. Schofield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul N. Schofield sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul N. Schofield is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a significant focus on Molecular Biology, Genetics, and emerging areas such as Artificial Intelligence. Additional subfields of study include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work covers diverse topics related to biomedical and genetic research. Key topics include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research, Effects of Radiation Exposure, and Topic Modeling.

Paul N. Schofield has published frequently in several scientific venues, with most contributions appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Mammalian Genome
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine

Their recent publications include:

  • "The GA4GH Phenopacket schema defines a computable representation of clinical data," 2022, Nature Biotechnology
  • "From tangled banks to toxic bunnies; a reflection on the issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach for environmental radiation protection," 2020, International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • "DeepMOCCA: A pan-cancer prognostic model identifies personalized prognostic markers through graph attention and multi-omics data integration," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Bio-acoustic signaling; exploring the potential of sound as a mediator of low-dose radiation and stress responses in the environment," 2020, International Journal of Radiation Biology
  • "GA4GH Phenopackets: A Practical Introduction," 2022, Advanced Genetics

Paul N. Schofield has collaborated extensively with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robert Hoehndorf
  • Georgios V. Gkoutos
  • Şenay Kafkas
  • Luke T. Slater
  • Núria Queralt-Rosiñach

Best Publications

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data

    Sebastian Köhler;Sandra C. Doelken;Christopher J. Mungall;Sebastian Bauer

  • A maternally methylated CpG island in KvLQT1 is associated with an antisense paternal transcript and loss of imprinting in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

    Nancy J. Smilinich;Colleen D. Day;Galina V. Fitzpatrick;Germaine M. Caldwell

  • IGF2 is parentally imprinted during human embryogenesis and in the Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome

    Rolf Ohlsson;Anders Nyström;Susan Pfeifer-Ohlsson;Virpi Töhönen

  • Molecular subtypes and phenotypic expression of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.

    Wendy N Cooper;Anita Luharia;Gail A Evans;Hussain Raza

  • The mammalian gene function resource: the international knockout mouse consortium

    Allan Bradley;Konstantinos Anastassiadis;Abdelkader Ayadi;James F. Battey

  • The role of ontologies in biological and biomedical research: a functional perspective

    Robert Hoehndorf;Paul N. Schofield;Georgios V. Gkoutos

  • Epigenotype-phenotype correlations in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

    Jacqueline R Engel;Alan Smallwood;Antonita Harper;Michael J Higgins

  • PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery

    Robert Hoehndorf;Paul Schofield;Georgios Vasileios Gkoutos

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology: Semantic Unification of Common and Rare Disease

    Tudor Groza;Sebastian Köhler;Dawid Moldenhauer;Nicole Vasilevsky

  • Prepublication data sharing.

    E Birney;T J Hudson;Green

  • Analysis of germline CDKN1C (p57KIP2) mutations in familial and sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) provides a novel genotype-phenotype correlation.

    Wayne W K Lam;Izuho Hatada;Sachiko Ohishi;Tsunehiro Mukai

  • Molecular and functional characterization of amylin, a peptide associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    A N Roberts;B Leighton;J A Todd;D Cockburn

  • Post-publication sharing of data and tools

    Paul N Schofield;Tania Bubela;Thomas A Weaver;Lili Portilla

  • Deletions of chromosomal regulatory boundaries are associated with congenital disease

    Jonas Ibn-Salem;Jonas Ibn-Salem;Sebastian Köhler;Michael I. Love;Ho Ryun Chung

  • Imprinting of IGF2 and H19: Lack of Reciprocity in Sporadic Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome

    Johanna A. Joyce;Wayne K. Lam;Wayne K. Lam;Daniel J. Catchpoole;Paul Jenks

  • The Units Ontology: a tool for integrating units of measurement in science

    Georgios V. Gkoutos;Paul N. Schofield;Robert Hoehndorf

  • Temporal changes in the expression of the insulin-like growth factor II gene associated with tissue maturation in the human fetus.

    A.L. Brice;J.E. Cheetham;V.N. Bolton;N.C. Hill

  • A mouse homoeo box gene is expressed during embryogenesis and in adult kidney.

    Ian J. Jackson;Paul Schofield;Paul Schofield;Brigid Hogan

  • Expression of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumour suppressor gene during human embryogenesis.

    Frances M. Richards;Paul N. Schofield;Stewart Fleming;Eamonn R. Maher

  • Abnormal skeletal and cardiac development, cardiomyopathy, muscle atrophy and cataracts in mice with a targeted disruption of the Nov (Ccn3) gene

    Emma Heath;Dalal Tahri;Elisabetta Andermarcher;Paul Schofield

Frequent Co-Authors

Georgios V. Gkoutos
Georgios V. Gkoutos University of Birmingham
Robert Hoehndorf
Robert Hoehndorf King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
John P. Sundberg
John P. Sundberg Vanderbilt University
John M. Hancock
John M. Hancock Norwich University
Damian Smedley
Damian Smedley Queen Mary University of London
Eamonn R. Maher
Eamonn R. Maher University of Cambridge
Peter N. Robinson
Peter N. Robinson The Jackson Laboratory
Wolf Reik
Wolf Reik Babraham Institute
Janan T. Eppig
Janan T. Eppig Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory
Morris A. Swertz
Morris A. Swertz University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul N. Schofield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles