World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bartha Maria Knoppers

Bartha Maria Knoppers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 77 446 383 26 24 537 64688

Bartha Maria Knoppers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bartha Maria Knoppers between 1963 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bartha Maria Knoppers published across 64 years, from 1963 to 2026, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2016. 11 of the 673 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2016. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 35 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 31 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 43 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1963 2026

673 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bartha Maria Knoppers: publications per year, 1963 to 2026
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 2
1992 1
1993 6
1994 3
1995 4
1996 6
1997 4
1998 9
1999 4
2000 9
2001 6
2002 8
2003 11
2004 16
2005 35
2006 24
2007 13
2008 12
2009 19
2010 26
2011 31
2012 32
2013 32
2014 43
2015 34
2016 44
2017 34
2018 30
2019 32
2020 28
2021 39
2022 25
2023 19
2024 13
2025 10
2026 1
Total 673
Download as CSV

Bartha Maria Knoppers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartha Maria Knoppers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 534–543 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 537 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7 537
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Bartha Maria Knoppers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bartha Maria Knoppers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30 77
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Social Sciences
  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Bartha Maria Knoppers is affiliated with the McGill University Health Centre in Canada. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Oncology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of Ethics in Clinical Research, Biomedical Ethics and Regulation, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics.

Recent publications include the following:

  • Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation (PERSPECTIVE I&I), 2021, Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • Rare loss-of-function variants in type I IFN immunity genes are not associated with severe COVID-19, 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada, 2021, Journal of Personalized Medicine

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ma'n H. Zawati
  • Yann Joly
  • Alexander Bernier
  • Michael J. S. Beauvais
  • Jacques Simard

Major publication venues where Bartha Maria Knoppers has contributed include:

  • Frontiers in Genetics
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine
  • European Journal of Human Genetics
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their work has been recognized through awards such as Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2015 by the Academy of Social Sciences and Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • A global reference for human genetic variation.

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • The International HapMap Project

    John W. Belmont;Paul Hardenbol;Thomas D. Willis;Fuli Yu

  • A haplotype map of the human genome

    John W. Belmont;Andrew Boudreau;Suzanne M. Leal;Paul Hardenbol

  • A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs

    Kelly A. Frazer;Dennis G. Ballinger;David R. Cox;David A. Hinds

  • Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations

    Pardis C. Sabeti;Pardis C. Sabeti;Patrick Varilly;Patrick Varilly;Ben Fry;Jason Lohmueller

  • International network of cancer genome projects

    Thomas J. Hudson;Thomas J. Hudson;Warwick Anderson;Axel Aretz;Anna D. Barker

  • Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing

    Ryan E. Mills;Klaudia Walter;Chip Stewart;Robert E. Handsaker

  • A global reference for human genetic variation

    Adam Auton;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David M. Altshuler;Richard M. Durbin

  • Whole genome sequencing resource identifies 18 new candidate genes for autism spectrum disorder

    Ryan K C Yuen;Daniele Merico;Matt Bookman;Jennifer L. Howe

  • Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.

    Carla G van El;Martina C Cornel;Pascal Borry;Ros J Hastings

  • A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing

    Richard M. Durbin;David L. Altshuler;Gonçalo R. Abecasis;David R. Bentley

  • Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.

    Susan M Wolf;Brittney N. Crock;Brian G Van Ness;Frances P Lawrenz

  • International Cooperation to Enable the Diagnosis of All Rare Genetic Diseases.

    Kym M. Boycott;Ana Rath;Jessica X. Chong;Taila Hartley

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps

    Adebowale Adeyemo;Mary K. Balaconis;Deanna R. Darnes

  • Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics.

    Ruth Chadwick;Bartha Maria Knoppers

  • Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks.

    A. Cambon-Thomsen;E. Rial-Sebbag;B. M. Knoppers

  • Framework for responsible sharing of genomic and health-related data

    Bartha Maria Knoppers

  • Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

    Wylie Burke;Armand H. Matheny Antommaria;Robin Bennett;Jeffrey Botkin

  • The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

    Bartha Maria Knoppers;Yann Joly;Jacques Simard;Francine Durocher

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Borry
Pascal Borry KU Leuven
Jane Kaye
Jane Kaye University of Oxford
Heidi L. Rehm
Heidi L. Rehm Brigham and Women's Hospital
Kym M. Boycott
Kym M. Boycott Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Thomas J. Hudson
Thomas J. Hudson Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Ellen Wright Clayton
Ellen Wright Clayton Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Timothy Caulfield
Timothy Caulfield University of Alberta
David Haussler
David Haussler University of California, Santa Cruz
huanming yang
huanming yang Beijing Genomics Institute
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career paths. Many students today are choosing flexible learning options that allow them to balance studies with work or other commitments. If you’re interested in counseling, it’s important to look for accredited programs. For instance, you can explore the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online to ensure you receive a quality education at an affordable cost.

If helping couples and families is your passion, consider a mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy) that can lead to licensure and private practice. Those fascinated by human behavior might be interested in earning a bachelor of science in psychology, a versatile option with applications in diverse fields such as business, education, and social services.

For students looking for impactful roles in communities, pursuing one of the masters in social work online is an excellent pathway that can lead to roles in clinical practice, policy, or research. Each of these online degree options is designed to help you develop specialized skills and find a rewarding career in the social sciences and humanities sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Bartha Maria Knoppers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles