World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5641 5239 3070 2782 151 10639

Frederick G. Lopez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick G. Lopez between 1974 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick G. Lopez published across 50 years, from 1974 to 2023, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1986. 3 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1986. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 10 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication
1974 2023

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick G. Lopez: publications per year, 1974 to 2023
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 10
1987 5
1988 3
1989 5
1990 0
1991 9
1992 4
1993 4
1994 2
1995 2
1996 3
1997 6
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 5
2002 6
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 9
2007 4
2008 5
2009 5
2010 8
2011 7
2012 0
2013 8
2014 8
2015 3
2016 6
2017 3
2018 7
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
2023 1
Total 163
Download as CSV

Frederick G. Lopez publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frederick G. Lopez D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Lopez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Frederick G. Lopez is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States and primarily conducts research in the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences. The main focus of their work spans several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Communication.

Their research encompasses a range of topics such as:

  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Identity, Memory, and Therapy

Frederick G. Lopez has published articles in several academic venues, with a notable presence in Emerging Adulthood and the Journal of American College Health. Recent publications include:

  • "Profiling Authentic Self-Development: Associations With Basic Need Satisfaction in Emerging Adulthood" (2022, Emerging Adulthood)
  • "Passive Facebook use and students' academic stress: The moderating role of authenticity" (2022, Journal of American College Health)
  • "Perfectionism, Goal Orientation, and Emerging Adults' Identity Processing Styles" (2023, Emerging Adulthood)

Collaboration is an element of Frederick G. Lopez's research. Frequent coauthors include Kenneth G. Rice, Barbara Durán, Jihee Hong, Mijin Kim, and George Poncy.

Among the recognitions, Frederick G. Lopez was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1996.

Best Publications

  • Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice.

    Robert W. Lent;Frederick G. Lopez;Kathleen J. Bieschke

  • Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines

    Robert W. Lent;Antonio M. Lopez;Frederick G. Lopez;Hung-Bin Sheu

  • Role of Social-Cognitive Expectations in High School Students' Mathematics-Related Interest and Performance.

    Frederick G. Lopez;Robert W. Lent;Steven D. Brown;Paul A. Gore

  • Predicting mathematics-related choice and success behaviors: Test of an expanded social cognitive model

    Robert W. Lent;Frederick G. Lopez;Kathleen J. Bieschke

  • Sources of Mathematics Self‐Efficacy in High School Students

    Frederick G. Lopez;Robert W. Lent

  • Latent structure of the sources of mathematics self-efficacy.

    Robert W. Lent;Frederick G. Lopez;Steven D. Brown;Paul A. Gore

  • Dynamic processes underlying adult attachment organization: Toward an attachment theoretical perspective on the healthy and effective self.

    Unknown

  • Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity.

    Frederick G. Lopez;Kenneth G. Rice

  • Cognitive Ties That Bind: A Tripartite View Of Efficacy Beliefs In Growth-promoting Relationships

    Robert W. Lent;Frederick G. Lopez

  • Stability and change in adult attachment style over the first-year college transition: Relations to self-confidence, coping, and distress patterns.

    Unknown

  • Respective contributions of therapist and client adult attachment orientations to the development of the early working alliance: a preliminary growth modeling study.

    Eric M. Sauer;Frederick G. Lopez;Barbara Gormley

  • The Contributions of Parental Attachment Bonds to College Student Development and Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Jonathan F. Mattanah;Frederick G. Lopez;John M. Govern

  • Borderline and antisocial personality scores as mediators between attachment and intimate partner violence.

    Anne Marie Mauricio;Jenn-Yun Tein;Frederick G. Lopez

  • Social cognitive predictors of the interests and choices of computing majors: Applicability to underrepresented students

    Robert W. Lent;Frederick G. Lopez;Hung-Bin Sheu;Antonio M. Lopez

  • Adult Attachment Orientations and College Student Distress: The Mediating Role of Problem Coping Styles

    Unknown

  • PARENTAL/SOCIAL INFLUENCES ON PERFECTIONISM AND ADULT ATTACHMENT ORIENTATIONS

    Kenneth G. Rice;Frederick G. Lopez;Deborah Vergara

  • Authenticity, Social Context, and Well-Being in the United States, England, and Russia A Three Country Comparative Analysis

    Oliver C. Robinson;Frederick G. Lopez;Katherine Ramos;Sofya Nartova-Bochaver

  • Contemporary counseling psychology: Results of a national survey.

    C. Edward Watkins;Frederick G. Lopez;Vicki L. Campbell;Catherine D. Himmell

  • Parents' work-family experiences and children's problem behaviors: the mediating role of the parent-child relationship

    Joana M. Vieira;Marisa Matias;Tiago Ferreira;Frederick G. Lopez

  • Family Structure, Psychological Separation, and College Adjustment: A Canonical Analysis and Cross-Validation.

    Frederick G. Lopez;Vicki L. Campbell;C. Edward Watkins

  • Parental divorce, parent–child bonds, and adult attachment orientations among college students: A comparison of three racial/ethnic groups.

    Frederick G. Lopez;Mickey C. Melendez;Kenneth G. Rice

  • College Men's Intimate Partner Violence Attitudes: Contributions of Adult Attachment and Gender Role Stress

    Ryon C. McDermott;Frederick G. Lopez

  • Depression, psychological separation, and college adjustment: An investigation for sex differences.

    Frederick G. Lopez;Vicki L. Campbell;C. Edward Watkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth G. Rice
Kenneth G. Rice Georgia State University
C. Edward Watkins
C. Edward Watkins University of North Texas
Robert W. Lent
Robert W. Lent University of Maryland, College Park
Madonna G. Constantine
Madonna G. Constantine Columbia University
Peter J. Norton
Peter J. Norton Monash University
Jenn-Yun Tein
Jenn-Yun Tein Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online can open doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, especially in counseling and therapy. Many students are interested in becoming licensed therapists, but requirements can vary significantly across different U.S. regions.

For example, licensed therapist requirements in Tulsa emphasize a graduate degree, supervised clinical experience, and passing a board exam. Meanwhile, licensed therapist requirements in Virginia Beach focus on similar academic credentials but may have different state-specific expectations for supervised hours.

If you’re aiming to work in urban areas, it’s important to consider the Washington DC licensed therapist requirements, which include background checks and detailed documentation of supervised clinical practice. In the Midwest, Wichita licensed therapist education requirements provide another perspective on educational prerequisites and state licensing exams.

Choosing an online psychology program can streamline your path, but always research the specific licensure requirements for your desired location to ensure a smooth entry into your chosen profession.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick G. Lopez

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles