World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4614 4271 256 248 220 10871

John Gleeson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Gleeson between 1972 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Gleeson published across 55 years, from 1972 to 2026, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2021. 18 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2021. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1972 2026

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Gleeson: publications per year, 1972 to 2026
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 1
2004 0
2005 5
2006 5
2007 0
2008 7
2009 6
2010 7
2011 6
2012 12
2013 10
2014 12
2015 9
2016 5
2017 11
2018 11
2019 19
2020 22
2021 25
2022 11
2023 24
2024 14
2025 17
2026 1
Total 243
Download as CSV

John Gleeson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 220 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 220
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Gleeson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Gleeson is affiliated with Australian Catholic University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a focus on digital mental health interventions and related areas. Their research encompasses several subfields, including applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and social psychology.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

John Gleeson has published multiple papers in prominent venues. Some notable recent publications are:

  • The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services, 2021, World Psychiatry
  • A Novel Multimodal Digital Service (Moderated Online Social Therapy+) for Help-Seeking Young People Experiencing Mental Ill-Health: Pilot Evaluation Within a National Youth E-Mental Health Service, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Leveraging the social network for treatment of social anxiety: Pilot study of a youth-specific digital intervention with a focus on engagement of young men, 2020, Internet Interventions
  • Digital Interventions for Psychological Well-being in University Students: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent publication venues where John Gleeson's work appears include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

The scientist has collaborated often with a number of colleagues including:

  • Mario Álvarez-Jiménez
  • Simon D'Alfonso
  • Sarah Bendall
  • Lee Valentine
  • David L. Penn

Best Publications

  • The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous;Brendon Stubbs;Josh A Firth

  • Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;A. Priede;Sarah Hetrick;Sarah Bendall

  • Loneliness over time: the crucial role of social anxiety

    Michelle H. Lim;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Michael J. Zyphur;John Francis Martin Gleeson

  • Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;M. A. Alcazar-Corcoles;Cesar Gonzalez-Blanch;Sarah Bendall

  • Non-pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Mario Álvarez-Jiménez;Sarah E. Hetrick;César González-Blanch;John F. Gleeson

  • Preventing the Second Episode: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Psychosocial and Pharmacological Trials in First-Episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Alexandra Parker;Sarah Hetrick;Patrick McGorry

  • Predictors of functional recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Mercedes Paino;Simon Rice;César González-Blanch

  • Road to full recovery: Longitudinal relationship between symptomatic remission and psychosocial recovery in first-episode psychosis over 7.5 years

    M Álvarez-Jiménez;JF Gleeson;LP Henry;SM Harrigan

  • On the HORYZON: Moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Sarah Bendall;Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley

  • The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in Emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being.

    Simon Haines;John Gleeson;Peter Kuppens;Tom Hollenstein

  • Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review

    Michelle H. Lim;John F. M. Gleeson;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;David L. Penn;David L. Penn

  • Online and Social Networking Interventions for the Treatment of Depression in Young People: A Systematic Review

    Simon Rice;Joanne Goodall;Sarah Hetrick;Alexandra Parker

  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Online Social Therapy for Youth Mental Health.

    Simon D'Alfonso;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Simon Rice;Greg Wadley

  • Exciting career opportunity beckons! Early intervention and vocational rehabilitation in first‐episode psychosis: employing cautious optimism

    Eoin J. Killackey;Henry J. Jackson;John Gleeson;Ian B. Hickie

  • Acute-phase and 1-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of CBT versus Befriending for first-episode psychosis : the ACE project

    Henry Jackson;Patrick McGorry;Eoin Killackey;Sarah Bendall

  • Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health

    Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley;John Gleeson;Sarah Bendall

  • Cyberbullying in social networking sites

    Rebecca Dredge;John Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • Risk Factors Associated with Impact Severity of Cyberbullying Victimization: A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Online Social Networking

    Rebecca Dredge;John F. M. Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients.

    John F. M. Gleeson;Sue M. Cotton;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Darryl Wade

  • Towards a better understanding of caregiver distress in early psychosis: a systematic review of the psychological factors involved.

    Jens Einar Jansen;Jens Einar Jansen;John Gleeson;Sue Cotton

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon M Rice
Simon M Rice University of Melbourne
Peter Koval
Peter Koval University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrew M. Chanen
Andrew M. Chanen University of Melbourne
Helen Herrman
Helen Herrman University of Melbourne
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Andrew Gumley
Andrew Gumley University of Glasgow
Kelly Allott
Kelly Allott University of Melbourne
Leanne Hides
Leanne Hides University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to rewarding careers in psychology, education, counseling, and more. Today, more students are choosing flexible online programs that match their schedules and career plans.

For those aiming to work in clinical settings, a psyd online degree offers intensive preparation for licensure as a psychologist. Similarly, if your passion is supporting families, there are accredited marriage and family therapy online programs that let you complete studies in less time and start helping clients sooner.

Budget-conscious students will appreciate the cheapest online master's in psychology programs, providing quality education without a heavy financial burden. If leadership in education is your goal, consider the fastest online edd programs to quickly advance into administrative or academic roles.

Online degrees not only offer flexible learning but also connect you to a range of specialized careers in today’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing John Gleeson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles