World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7574 7063 445 434 106 6975

Peter Koval publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Koval between 2009 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Koval published across 18 years, from 2009 to 2026, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2022. 13 of the 153 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2022. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
2009 2026

153 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Koval: publications per year, 2009 to 2026
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 6
2013 12
2014 6
2015 10
2016 5
2017 6
2018 5
2019 8
2020 14
2021 12
2022 21
2023 15
2024 14
2025 12
2026 1
Total 153
Download as CSV

Peter Koval publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Koval sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 106
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Koval D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Koval sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Koval is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and specializes in the field of Psychology, with a primary focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Their research spans several subfields including Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents

Peter Koval has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • Emotion regulation in everyday life: Mapping global self-reports to daily processes. (2022, Emotion)
  • The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services (2021, World Psychiatry)
  • Digital Emotion Regulation (2020, Current Directions in Psychological Science)
  • Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Some Recommendations on the Use of Daily Life Methods in Affective Science (2022, Affective Science)

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Elise K. Kalokerinos
  • Mario Álvarez-Jiménez
  • John Gleeson
  • Peter Kuppens
  • Ella K. Moeck

Peter Koval's publications are often found in a core set of journals, indicating the typical venues for their research dissemination. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Emotion
  • Affective Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science

Best Publications

  • The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life.

    Karen Brans;Peter Koval;Philippe Verduyn;Yan Lin Lim

  • Affect dynamics in relation to depressive symptoms: Variable, unstable or inert?

    Peter Koval;Madeline Lee Pe;Kristof Meers;Peter Kuppens

  • Getting stuck in depression: The roles of rumination and emotional inertia

    Peter Koval;Peter Kuppens;Nicholas B. Allen;Lisa Sheeber

  • From Data to Causes I: Building A General Cross-Lagged Panel Model (GCLM)

    Michael J. Zyphur;Paul D. Allison;Louis Tay;Manuel C. Voelkle;Manuel C. Voelkle

  • Affective Dynamics in Psychopathology

    Timothy J. Trull;Sean P. Lane;Peter Koval;Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer

  • The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in Emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being.

    Simon Haines;John Gleeson;Peter Kuppens;Tom Hollenstein

  • Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: the implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status.

    Brock Bastian;Simon M Laham;Samuel Wilson;Nick Haslam

  • The name-pronunciation effect: Why people like Mr. Smith more than Mr. Colquhoun

    Simon M. Laham;Peter Koval;Peter Koval;Adam L. Alter

  • Negative emotion differentiation: Its personality and well-being correlates and a comparison of different assessment methods

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Madeline Lee Pe;Peter Koval

  • Changing emotion dynamics: individual differences in the effect of anticipatory social stress on emotional inertia.

    Peter Koval;Peter Kuppens

  • Affective Instability in Daily Life Is Predicted by Resting Heart Rate Variability

    Peter Koval;Barbara Ogrinz;Peter Kuppens;Omer Van den Bergh

  • Emotional inertia and external events: The roles of exposure, reactivity, and recovery.

    Peter Koval;Annette Brose;Madeline L Pe;Marlies Houben

  • Feeling bad about being sad: The role of social expectancies in amplifying negative mood.

    Brock Bastian;Peter Kuppens;Matthew J. Hornsey;Joonha Park

  • Emotional inertia contributes to depressive symptoms beyond perseverative thinking.

    Annette Brose;Florian Schmiedek;Peter Koval;Peter Kuppens

  • Sexual objectification in women's daily lives: A smartphone ecological momentary assessment study

    Elise Holland;Peter Koval;Peter Koval;Michelle Stratemeyer;Fiona Thomson

  • Moderated online social therapy for depression relapse prevention in young people: pilot study of a 'next generation' online intervention.

    Simon Rice;John Gleeson;Christopher G. Davey;Sarah Hetrick

  • Emotional Inertia is Associated with Lower Well-Being when Controlling for Differences in Emotional Context

    Peter Koval;Peter Koval;Stefan Sütterlin;Stefan Sütterlin;Peter Kuppens

  • The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience varies with personality and culture.

    Peter Kuppens;Francis Tuerlinckx;Michelle Yik;Peter Koval;Peter Koval

  • The Horyzons project: a randomized controlled trial of a novel online social therapy to maintain treatment effects from specialist first-episode psychosis services.

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Peter Koval;Lianne Schmaal;Sarah Bendall

  • Why I don't always know what I'm feeling: The role of stress in within-person fluctuations in emotion differentiation.

    Yasemin Erbas;Eva Ceulemans;Elise K Kalokerinos;Marlies Houben

  • Modeling individual differences in emotion regulation repertoire in daily life with multilevel latent profile analysis.

    Gloria Grommisch;Peter Koval;Jordan D. X. Hinton;John Gleeson

  • Executive well-being: updating of positive stimuli in working memory is associated with subjective well-being

    Madeline Lee Pe;Peter Koval;Peter Kuppens;Peter Kuppens

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Kuppens
Peter Kuppens KU Leuven
John Gleeson
John Gleeson Australian Catholic University
Stefan Sütterlin
Stefan Sütterlin Østfold University College
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
Mario Alvarez-Jimenez University of Melbourne
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Philippe Verduyn
Philippe Verduyn Maastricht University
Tom Hollenstein
Tom Hollenstein Queen's University
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Helen Herrman
Helen Herrman University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse academic and professional opportunities. Students looking for flexibility may consider bcba certification programs online to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, a credential in high demand for those interested in applied behavior analysis.

For advanced studies, masters and psyd combined programs offer an accelerated route for those aiming for both a master’s and a Doctor of Psychology degree. This pathway is ideal for students seeking clinical expertise and practical experience in one streamlined curriculum.

Those drawn to research and developmental processes may explore a developmental psych phd program. These doctoral tracks focus on human growth, cognitive development, and lifespan changes, preparing graduates for roles in academia, research, or policy.

With many specialized doctoral options available, reviewing the best psychology doctoral programs can help applicants find the right fit for their career goals, whether in clinical, counseling, educational, or experimental psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Koval

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles