World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
9190
World Ranking
5518
National Ranking
2019

J. Goldstein publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Goldstein sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 258 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

J. Goldstein D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Goldstein sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Goldstein is affiliated with the Southwest Research Institute in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Physics and Astronomy and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on the subfields of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, and Atmospheric Science.

Their main topics of work include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research

J. Goldstein has contributed to a number of scientific publications. Their recent papers include:

  • 3DI: A novel ion composition and three-dimensional velocity analyzer for the topside ionosphere, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Oxygen torus and its coincidence with EMIC wave in the deep inner magnetosphere: Van Allen Probe B and Arase observations, 2020, Earth Planets and Space
  • Application of Recurrent Neural Network to Modeling Earth's Global Electron Density, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Determining Plasmaspheric Density From the Upper Hybrid Resonance and From the Spacecraft Potential: How Do They Compare?, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Nightside Plasmaspheric Plume-To-Core Migration of Whistler-Mode Hiss Waves, 2022, Geophysical Research Letters

J. Goldstein collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • S. A. Fuselier
  • J. L. Burch
  • M. J. Kim
  • H. E. Spence
  • G. D. Reeves

Their work is often published in key scientific venues such as:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
  • Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space.

    J. L. Burch;R. B. Torbert;R. B. Torbert;T. D. Phan;L. J Chen

  • Science Goals and Overview of the Radiation Belt Storm Probes (RBSP) Energetic Particle, Composition, and Thermal Plasma (ECT) Suite on NASA’s Van Allen Probes Mission

    H. E. Spence;G. D. Reeves;D. N. Baker;J. B. Blake

  • An extreme distortion of the Van Allen belt arising from the ‘Hallowe'en’ solar storm in 2003

    D. N. Baker;S. G. Kanekal;X. Li;S. P. Monk

  • Ionospheric signatures of plasmaspheric tails

    J. C. Foster;P. J. Erickson;A. J. Coster;J. Goldstein

  • A long-lived relativistic electron storage ring embedded in Earth's outer Van Allen belt.

    D. N. Baker;S. G. Kanekal;V. C. Hoxie;M. G. Henderson

  • Extreme Ultraviolet Imager Observations of the Structure and Dynamics of the Plasmasphere

    B. R. Sandel;J. Goldstein;D. L. Gallagher;M. Spasojevic

  • Search for narrow resonances using the dijet mass spectrum in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV

    S. Chatrchyan;V. Khachatryan;A. M. Sirunyan;A. Tumasyan

  • Global response of the plasmasphere to a geomagnetic disturbance

    M. Spasojević;J. Goldstein;D. L. Carpenter;U. S. Inan

  • Simultaneous remote sensing and in situ observations of plasmaspheric drainage plumes

    J. Goldstein;J. Goldstein;B. R. Sandel;M. F. Thomsen;M. Spasojević

  • Identifying the plasmapause in IMAGE EUV data using IMAGE RPI in situ steep density gradients

    J. Goldstein;M. Spasojević;P. H. Reiff;B. R. Sandel

  • Plasmaspheric Density Structures and Dynamics: Properties Observed by the CLUSTER and IMAGE Missions

    Fabien Darrouzet;Dennis L. Gallagher;Nicolas André;Donald L. Carpenter

  • Control of plasmaspheric dynamics by both convection and sub- auroral polarization stream

    J. Goldstein;B. R. Sandel;M. R. Hairston;P. H. Reiff

  • The Two Wide-angle Imaging Neutral-atom Spectrometers (TWINS) NASA Mission-of-Opportunity

    D. J. McComas;F. Allegrini;J. Baldonado;B. Blake

  • Observations of coincident EMIC wave activity and duskside energetic electron precipitation on 18-19 January 2013

    L. W. Blum;A. Halford;R. Millan;J. W. Bonnell

  • Properties of local plasma injections in Saturn's magnetosphere

    James L. Burch;J. Goldstein;T. W. Hill;D. T. Young

  • The Global Pattern of Evolution of Plasmaspheric Drainage Plumes

    J. Goldstein;B. R. Sandel

  • Electron density in the magnetosphere

    R. E. Denton;J. D. Menietti;J. Goldstein;S. L. Young

  • Magnetospheric model of subauroral polarization stream

    J. Goldstein;J. L. Burch;B. R. Sandel

  • Simulated magnetopause losses and Van Allen Probe flux dropouts

    M. K. Hudson;D. N. Baker;J. Goldstein;J. Goldstein;B. T. Kress

  • Simulation of Van Allen Probes plasmapause encounters

    J. Goldstein;J. Goldstein;S. De Pascuale;C A. Kletzing;W. S. Kurth

  • Investigation of EMIC wave scattering as the cause for the BARREL 17 January 2013 relativistic electron precipitation event: A quantitative comparison of simulation with observations

    Zan Li;Robyn M. Millan;Mary K. Hudson;Leslie A. Woodger

  • IMF-driven plasmasphere erosion of 10 July 2000

    J. Goldstein;B. R. Sandel;W. T. Forrester;P. H. Reiff

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. McComas
David J. McComas Princeton University
James L. Burch
James L. Burch Southwest Research Institute
Bill R. Sandel
Bill R. Sandel University of Arizona
Harlan E. Spence
Harlan E. Spence University of New Hampshire
Dennis L. Gallagher
Dennis L. Gallagher Marshall Space Flight Center
William S. Kurth
William S. Kurth University of Iowa
Pontus C. Brandt
Pontus C. Brandt Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Geoffrey D. Reeves
Geoffrey D. Reeves Los Alamos National Laboratory
Patricia H. Reiff
Patricia H. Reiff Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs such as the affordable online general studies degree offer flexible, budget-friendly options to build foundational skills that complement environmental knowledge.

Some learners may prefer to pursue one of the easiest bachelor degree to get options available online, allowing them to balance studies with other commitments while gaining useful credentials. This approach can pave the way into specialized fields without overwhelming difficulty.

Specialized disciplines like geology are often closely linked to environmental careers. Aspiring professionals can find accredited geology degrees online that provide thorough scientific training applicable to natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are highly valuable in environmental analysis. The best GIS undergraduate programs offer practical coursework in mapping technologies that support data-driven environmental decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing J. Goldstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles