World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
94
Citations
36287
World Ranking
807
National Ranking
37

Nick Haslam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Haslam sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 341 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nick Haslam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Haslam sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick Haslam is a researcher affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their academic work primarily focuses on the fields of psychology and social sciences, with substantial contributions in social psychology and sociology and political science. Clinical psychology, philosophy, and cognitive neuroscience are also areas where they have published.

The research topics covered by Nick Haslam emphasize various aspects of mental health and social behavior. Key topics include social and intergroup psychology, mental health and psychiatry, mental health treatment and access, cultural differences and values, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, and behavioral health and interventions.

Nick Haslam frequently publishes in several academic venues, notably:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Australasian Psychiatry
  • Australian Journal of Psychology
  • SSM - Mental Health

Collaborations with other researchers are a prominent aspect of Nick Haslam's work. Frequent co-authors include Melanie J. McGrath, Ekaterina Vylomova, Jesse S. Y. Tse, Naomi Baes, and Morgan Weaving.

Their recent published papers illustrate the range and focus of their research contributions:

  • "Dimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research," 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • "Feeling down? A systematic review of the gut microbiota in anxiety/depression and irritable bowel syndrome," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The mental health impacts of climate change: Findings from a Pacific Island atoll nation," 2020, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • "Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools," 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations," 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science

Best Publications

  • Dehumanization: An Integrative Review

    Nick Haslam

  • Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis.

    Matthew Porter;Nick Haslam

  • Dehumanization and infrahumanization.

    Nick Haslam;Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan

  • Essentialist beliefs about social categories.

    Nick Haslam;Louis Rothschild;Donald Ernst

  • Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the 'mental illness is an illness like any other' approach.

    J. Read;N. Haslam;L. Sayce;E. Davies

  • Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement

    Brock Bastian;Nick Haslam

  • More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others

    Nick Haslam;Paul Bain;Lauren Douge;Max Lee

  • Categories versus dimensions in personality and psychopathology: a quantitative review of taxometric research

    N. Haslam;E. Holland;Peter Kuppens

  • The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals

    Steve Loughnan;Nick Haslam;Brock Bastian

  • Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption

    Brock Bastian;Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Nick Haslam;Helena R. M. Radke

  • Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality: Structure and Implications for Prejudice

    Nick Haslam;Sheri R. Levy

  • The 'side effects' of medicalization: a meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma.

    Erlend P. Kvaale;Nick Haslam;William H. Gottdiener

  • Excluded from humanity: The dehumanizing effects of social ostracism

    Brock Bastian;Nick Haslam

  • Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice

    Nick Haslam;Louis Rothschild;Donald Ernst

  • Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others

    Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Nick Haslam;Tess Murnane;Jeroen Vaes

  • Concept Creep: Psychology's Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology

    Nick Haslam

  • Introduction to the Taxometric Method: A Practical Guide

    John Ruscio;Nick Haslam;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • Attributing and denying humanness to others

    Nick Haslam;Stephen Loughnan;Yoshihisa Kashima;Paul Bain

  • Animals and androids: Implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans

    Stephen Loughnan;Nick Haslam

  • Confusing one person with another: what errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations.

    Alan Page Fiske;Nick Haslam;Susan Tufts Fiske

  • Psychological essentialism, implicit theories, and intergroup relations

    Nick Haslam;Brock Bastian;Paul Bain;Yoshihisa Kashima

  • Advances in Psychology Research

    Meredith O'Connor;Steve Loughnan;Nick Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Yoshihisa Kashima
Yoshihisa Kashima University of Melbourne
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Alan Page Fiske
Alan Page Fiske University of California, Los Angeles
Peter Koval
Peter Koval University of Melbourne
John Ruscio
John Ruscio College of New Jersey
Ayelet Meron Ruscio
Ayelet Meron Ruscio University of Pennsylvania
John Read
John Read University of East London
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA offers a variety of online degree options and career pathways, especially for those interested in becoming licensed counselors. Students often pursue online bachelor’s or master’s degrees, which can be a stepping stone toward fulfilling state licensure requirements for counseling careers.

Each state sets its own educational and practical requirements for counselors. For example, obtaining an Arizona licensed professional counselor requirements includes a master’s degree and supervised post-graduate work. Prospective counselors exploring Arkansas lpc licensure requirements must complete approved coursework, pass an exam, and obtain supervised experience.

The process can vary widely by state. For those interested in learning how to get an lpc license in California, additional state-specific coursework and exams are required. Similarly, lpc licensure requirements in Colorado include specific training, clinical experience, and the completion of a licensing exam.

When considering online degrees and future careers, it’s crucial to research and meet your state’s licensure requirements to ensure a smooth path toward your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Haslam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles