World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2242 2043 249 233 298 23207

John Read publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Read between 1960 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Read published across 67 years, from 1960 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2013. 14 of the 352 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2013. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1960 2026

352 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Read: publications per year, 1960 to 2026
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 1
1962 1
1963 0
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 1
1968 0
1969 2
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 0
1997 4
1998 4
1999 4
2000 2
2001 9
2002 4
2003 4
2004 13
2005 7
2006 15
2007 16
2008 11
2009 14
2010 8
2011 12
2012 10
2013 31
2014 14
2015 18
2016 17
2017 17
2018 20
2019 21
2020 11
2021 12
2022 10
2023 10
2024 6
2025 13
2026 1
Total 352
Download as CSV

John Read publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 298 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 298
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Read D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Read sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Read is affiliated with the University of East London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a significant focus on subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and General Health Professions.

The core topics addressed in their work include:

  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Associated Phenomena
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

John Read's research outputs have been frequently published in venues such as:

  • Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
  • Community Mental Health Journal
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Their recent papers include:

  • "The role of Facebook groups in the management and raising of awareness of antidepressant withdrawal: is social media filling the void left by health services?", 2021, Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
  • "A survey of UK general practitioners about depression, antidepressants and withdrawal: implementing the 2019 Public Health England report", 2020, Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
  • "A response to yet another defence of ECT in the absence of robust efficacy and safety evidence", 2022, Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • "The Power Threat Meaning Framework: Addressing Adversity, Challenging Prejudice and Stigma, and Transforming Services", 2020, Journal of Constructivist Psychology
  • "The impact of adverse childhood experiences and recent life events on anxiety and quality of life in university students", 2021, Higher Education

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John Read include:

  • Chris Harrop
  • Jim Geekie
  • Sue Cunliffe
  • Joanna Moncrieff
  • Mark Horowitz

Best Publications

  • Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis: A Meta-analysis of Patient-Control, Prospective- and Cross-sectional Cohort Studies

    Filippo Varese;Filippo Varese;Feikje Smeets;Marjan Drukker;Ritsaert Lieverse

  • Childhood trauma, psychosis and schizophrenia: a literature review with theoretical and clinical implications

    John Read;J. Van Os;A. P. Morrison;C. A. Ross

  • The contribution of early traumatic events to schizophrenia in some patients: a traumagenic neurodevelopmental model

    John Read;Bruce D. Perry;Andrew Moskowitz;Jan Connolly

  • Prejudice and schizophrenia: a review of the 'mental illness is an illness like any other' approach.

    J. Read;N. Haslam;L. Sayce;E. Davies

  • Sexual and physical abuse during childhood and adulthood as predictors of hallucinations, delusions and thought disorder.

    John Read;Kirsty Agar;Nick Argyle;Volkmar Aderhold

  • Models of Madness : Psychological, Social and Biological Approaches to Schizophrenia

    John Read;Loren R. Mosher;Richard P. Bentall

  • True Photographs and False Memories

    D. Stephen Lindsay;Lisa Hagen;J. Don Read;Kimberley A. Wade

  • A systematic review into the incidence, severity and duration of antidepressant withdrawal effects: Are guidelines evidence-based?

    James Davies;John Read

  • Why, when and how to ask about childhood abuse

    John Read;Paul Hammersley;Thom Rudegeair

  • THE ENGLISH VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE OF INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

    Ari Nurweni;John Read

  • From adversity to psychosis: pathways and mechanisms from specific adversities to specific symptoms

    Richard P. Bentall;Paulo de Sousa;Filippo Varese;Sophie Wickham

  • The role of biological and genetic causal beliefs in the stigmatisation of 'mental patients'

    John Read;Niki Harré

  • The prevalence of voice-hearers in the general population: A literature review

    Vanessa Beavan;John Read;Claire Cartwright

  • The traumagenic neurodevelopmental model of psychosis revisited

    John Read;Roar Fosse;Andrew Moskowitz;Bruce Perry

  • Hallucinations, delusions, and thought disorder among adult psychiatric inpatients with a history of child abuse.

    John Read;Nick Argyle

  • Heterogeneity in psychiatric diagnostic classification

    Kate Allsopp;Kate Allsopp;John Read;Rhiannon Corcoran;Peter Kinderman

  • Time to abandon the bio-bio-bio model of psychosis: Exploring the epigenetic and psychological mechanisms by which adverse life events lead to psychotic symptoms.

    John Read;Richard P Bentall;Roar Fosse

  • The Relationship of Causal Beliefs and Contact With Users of Mental Health Services To Attitudes To the 'Mentally Ill':

    John Read;Alan Law

  • Influence of antipsychotics on mortality in schizophrenia: systematic review.

    Stefan Weinmann;John Read;Volkmar Aderhold

  • Child abuse and psychosis: A literature review and implications for professional practice.

    John Read

  • Models of madness: psychological, social and biological approaches to schizophrenia / John Read, Loren R. Mosher, Richard P. Bentall (eds.)

    John Read;Loren R. Mosher;Richard P. Bentall

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard P. Bentall
Richard P. Bentall University of Sheffield
Lorenza Magliano
Lorenza Magliano University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Anthony P. Morrison
Anthony P. Morrison University of Manchester
Colin A. Ross
Colin A. Ross University of Manitoba
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Suzanne Barker-Collo
Suzanne Barker-Collo University of Auckland
Filippo Varese
Filippo Varese University of Manchester
Paul Nation
Paul Nation Victoria University of Wellington
Peter Kinderman
Peter Kinderman University of Liverpool
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a range of rewarding online pathways. Many students consider becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst, which involves fulfilling bcba certification requirements including specific graduate coursework and supervised fieldwork.

Another growing field is business psychology. With a focus on optimizing workplace environments, aspiring professionals should be aware of the business psychologist education requirements, such as obtaining advanced degrees and gaining organizational experience.

For those passionate about helping children, careers like child life specialist or child psychologist are excellent options. Future specialists should develop strong child life specialist skills, such as empathy, crisis management, and communication.

Prospective child psychologists must also fulfill specific child psychologist requirements, including advanced degrees and licensure.

Each of these rewarding psychology career pathways can begin with flexible online degrees, making it easier than ever to reach your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing John Read

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles