World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2835 2594 1370 1236 118 45363

Naomi P. Friedman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Naomi P. Friedman between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Naomi P. Friedman published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2023. 11 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2023. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Naomi P. Friedman: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
2012 4
2013 2
2014 5
2015 6
2016 4
2017 6
2018 9
2019 19
2020 8
2021 18
2022 19
2023 26
2024 26
2025 10
2026 1
Total 181
Download as CSV

Naomi P. Friedman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi P. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 118
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Naomi P. Friedman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi P. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Naomi P. Friedman is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with a focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Friedman's work addresses several core topics, including Cognitive Abilities and Testing, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Mental Health Research Topics, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Recent scholarly contributions by Friedman include publications in high-impact journals. Notable papers are:

  • "The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function" (2021), published in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "Twin studies to GWAS: there and back again" (2021), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Other recent collaborative works in which Friedman is associated include studies published in Nature Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, and Assessment, highlighting interdisciplinary collaboration within neuroscience and psychiatry.

Frequent co-authors of Friedman include Robin P. Corley, Marie T. Banich, John K. Hewitt, Claire L. Morrison, and Tor D. Wager, reflecting sustained collaborative efforts across their research projects.

Friedman's work has been published repeatedly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Behavior Genetics, Clinical Psychological Science, NeuroImage, and Biological Psychiatry. These outlets indicate a research trajectory engaged with both pre-publication dissemination and established peer-reviewed journals within psychology and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

    Akira Miyake;Naomi P. Friedman;Michael J. Emerson;Alexander H. Witzki

  • The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions

    Akira Miyake;Naomi P. Friedman

  • The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis.

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake

  • Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake;Susan E. Young;John C. DeFries

  • Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure.

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake

  • Not All Executive Functions Are Related to Intelligence

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake;Robin P. Corley;Susan E. Young

  • How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

    Akira Miyake;Naomi P. Friedman;David A. Rettinger;Priti Shah

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • Behavioral disinhibition: liability for externalizing spectrum disorders and its genetic and environmental relation to response inhibition across adolescence.

    Susan E. Young;Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake;Erik G. Willcutt

  • Developmental Trajectories in Toddlers’ Self-restraint Predict Individual Differences in Executive Functions 14 Years Later: A Behavioral Genetic Analysis

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake;JoAnn L. Robinson;John K. Hewitt

  • The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability

    Naomi P Friedman;Akira Miyake

  • ASSESSMENT OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN CLINICAL SETTINGS: PROBLEMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    Akira Miyake;Michael J. Emerson;Naomi P. Friedman

  • Stability and Change in Executive Function Abilities from Late Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A Longitudinal Twin Study.

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake;Lee J. Altamirano;Robin P. Corley

  • Greater Attention Problems During Childhood Predict Poorer Executive Functioning in Late Adolescence

    Naomi P. Friedman;Brett C. Haberstick;Erik G. Willcutt;Akira Miyake

  • Comparison of four scoring methods for the reading span test.

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake

  • Resting-state networks predict individual differences in common and specific aspects of executive function.

    Andrew E. Reineberg;Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna;Brendan Eliot Depue;Naomi P. Friedman

  • Genetic Relations Among Procrastination, Impulsivity, and Goal-Management Ability Implications for the Evolutionary Origin of Procrastination

    Daniel E. Gustavson;Akira Miyake;John K. Hewitt;Naomi P. Friedman

  • Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction.

    Naomi P. Friedman;Akira Miyake

  • Toward a comprehensive understanding of executive cognitive function in implicit racial bias.

    Tiffany A. Ito;Naomi P. Friedman;Bruce D. Bartholow;Joshua Correll

  • Sleep reactivity and insomnia: genetic and environmental influences.

    Christopher L. Drake;Naomi P. Friedman;Kenneth P. Wright;Thomas Roth;Thomas Roth

  • College attendance and its effect on drinking behaviors in a longitudinal study of adolescents.

    David S. Timberlake;David S. Timberlake;Christian J. Hopfer;Soo Hyun Rhee;Naomi P. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

John K. Hewitt
John K. Hewitt University of Colorado Boulder
Robin P. Corley
Robin P. Corley University of Colorado Boulder
Soo Hyun Rhee
Soo Hyun Rhee University of Colorado Boulder
Akira Miyake
Akira Miyake University of Colorado Boulder
Marie T. Banich
Marie T. Banich University of Colorado Boulder
JoAnn Robinson
JoAnn Robinson University of Connecticut
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Chandra A. Reynolds
Chandra A. Reynolds University of California, Riverside
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler
Carolyn Zahn-Waxler University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of online study options and career avenues. Many students seek programs that are affordable and flexible, especially when balancing work and personal commitments. For those interested in social work, the cheapest online msw programs offer accessible pathways to a rewarding profession in community and clinical settings.

Behavioral analysis is another popular field. Accredited bcba programs can prepare students to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, supporting individuals with developmental and behavioral challenges.

Time-efficient degrees are in high demand. Students who need to earn credentials quickly might consider enrolling in a 1 year online master's in social work, or explore the fastest psychology degree to accelerate their entry into professional roles.

Choosing the right online degree can help you build specialized skills and advance your career in social services, counseling, research, and more—while balancing affordability and speed.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi P. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles