World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
35861
World Ranking
985
National Ranking
618

Neuroscience

D-Index
89
Citations
35957
World Ranking
1136
National Ranking
588

Marie T. Banich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie T. Banich sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marie T. Banich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marie T. Banich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marie T. Banich is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Additional areas of study include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Genetics.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Marie T. Banich has published extensively in a variety of journals, with frequent publications in:

  • NeuroImage
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Among recent papers associated with related collaborative efforts are:

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2021, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study, 2021, Nature Neuroscience
  • Twin studies to GWAS: there and back again, 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Structural Brain Architectures Match Intrinsic Functional Networks and Vary across Domains: A Study from 15,000+ Individuals, 2020, Cerebral Cortex

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Marie T. Banich include:

  • Rebecca J. Compton
  • Harry R. Smolker
  • Naomi P. Friedman
  • Hannah R. Snyder
  • Benjamin L. Hankin

In addition to journal articles, Marie T. Banich has contributed to academic books, including a publication with Cambridge University Press titled Cognitive Neuroscience from 2023.

Best Publications

  • The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites.

    B.J. Casey;B.J. Casey;Tariq Cannonier;May I. Conley;May I. Conley;Alexandra O. Cohen

  • Ageing, fitness and neurocognitive function.

    Arthur F. Kramer;Sowon Hahn;Neal J. Cohen;Marie T. Banich

  • Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model.

    Laurence Steinberg;Dustin Albert;Elizabeth Cauffman;Marie Banich

  • Age Differences in Future Orientation and Delay Discounting

    Laurence D. Steinberg;Sandra Graham;Lia O’Brien;Jennifer Woolard

  • Executive Function The Search for an Integrated Account

    Marie T. Banich

  • Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

    Donald J. Hagler;Sean N. Hatton;M. Daniela Cornejo;Carolina Makowski

  • A unified framework for inhibitory control.

    Yuko Munakata;Seth A. Herd;Christopher H. Chatham;Brendan E. Depue

  • Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI study of the stroop task.

    Michael P. Milham;Kirk I. Erickson;Marie T. Banich;Arthur F. Kramer

  • The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict.

    M.P Milham;M.T Banich;A Webb;V Barad

  • Age differences in affective decision making as indexed by performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.

    Elizabeth Cauffman;Elizabeth P. Shulman;Laurence Steinberg;Eric Claus

  • fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection

    Marie T. Banich;Michael P. Milham;Ruthann Atchley;Neal J. Cohen

  • Prefrontal Regions Orchestrate Suppression of Emotional Memories via a Two-Phase Process

    Brendan E. Depue;Tim Curran;Marie T. Banich

  • Adolescent neurocognitive development and impacts of substance use: Overview of the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) baseline neurocognition battery.

    Monica M Luciana;J. M. Bjork;B. J. Nagel

  • Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI.

    Xun Liu;Marie T Banich;Benjamin L Jacobson;Jody L Tanabe

  • Inhibition Versus Switching Deficits in Different Forms of Rumination

    Anson J. Whitmer;Marie T. Banich

  • Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces.

    Jerre Levy;Wendy Heller;Marie T Banich;Leslie A Burton

  • Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: evidence from fMRI

    Marie T. Banich;Michael P. Milham;Ruth Ann Atchley;Neal J. Cohen

  • Are adolescents less mature than adults?: minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA "flip-flop"

    Laurence Steinberg;Elizabeth Cauffman;Jennifer Woolard;Sandra Graham

  • Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology

    Marie T. Banich

  • Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control.

    Michael P. Milham;Marie T. Banich;Eric D. Claus;Neal J. Cohen

  • Paying attention to emotion: an fMRI investigation of cognitive and emotional stroop tasks.

    Rebecca J. Compton;Marie T. Banich;Aprajita Mohanty;Michael P. Milham

  • Research report The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict

    M. P. Milham;M. T. Banich;A. Webb;V. Barad

Frequent Co-Authors

Wendy Heller
Wendy Heller University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gregory A. Miller
Gregory A. Miller University of California, Los Angeles
Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Jeffrey M. Spielberg
Jeffrey M. Spielberg University of Delaware
Neal J. Cohen
Neal J. Cohen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Arthur F. Kramer
Arthur F. Kramer Northeastern University
Naomi P. Friedman
Naomi P. Friedman University of Colorado Boulder
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna University of Arizona
John D. Herrington
John D. Herrington Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
John K. Hewitt
John K. Hewitt University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens diverse educational and career opportunities. Students aiming for advanced practice roles can find affordable options by researching the cheapest apa accredited psyd programs. These accredited doctorates can be pursued online and lead to expert-level positions in clinical settings.

Those drawn to the intersection of law and mental health may consider degrees focusing on forensic or criminal psychology. Graduates from these programs can pursue a variety of jobs with criminal psychology degree, including criminal profiler, forensic psychologist, or victim advocate.

It’s important to choose the right graduate program for your goals. Understand the differences between degrees, such as whether which is better msw or masters in counseling for your desired career, as each opens unique paths in mental health services.

If flexibility and accessibility are priorities, review some of the easiest psychology degree programs available online. These programs can help you balance studies with other commitments while still preparing you for meaningful work in psychology or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marie T. Banich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles