World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 32 7224 6712 69 67 85 7377

Jeroen Vaes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeroen Vaes between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeroen Vaes published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2011. 9 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2011. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeroen Vaes: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 0
2009 5
2010 5
2011 9
2012 4
2013 6
2014 8
2015 5
2016 3
2017 4
2018 1
2019 4
2020 2
2021 7
2022 3
2023 5
2024 4
2025 5
Total 95
Download as CSV

Jeroen Vaes publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Vaes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 85 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 85
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeroen Vaes D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen Vaes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222 32
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeroen Vaes is affiliated with the University of Trento in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on social psychology and related subfields.

Their research spans several areas within psychology, including:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sociology and Political Science

Vaes has explored diverse topics throughout their career, covering:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Their recent papers include:

  • "Of precarity and conspiracy: Introducing a socio-functional model of conspiracy beliefs," 2022, British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Lacking socio-economic status reduces subjective well-being through perceptions of meta-dehumanization," 2020, British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Seven Clarifications on the Psychology of Dehumanization," 2020, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Sexual objectification: advancements and avenues for future research," 2023, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "Dehumanization after all: Distinguishing intergroup evaluation from trait-based dehumanization," 2022, Cognition

The frequent publication venues for Vaes's research include:

  • Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Over their career, Vaes has collaborated regularly with various coauthors, some prominent ones being:

  • Daniela Ruzzante
  • Maria Paola Paladino
  • Bianca Monachesi
  • Alessandro Grecucci
  • Jaïs Adam-Troian

The scope and interdisciplinary approach of Vaes's work reflect engagement with evolutionary, social, and cognitive aspects of psychology. Their studies probe into intergroup relations, dehumanization, social exclusion, and other relevant phenomena within human behavior and societal perception.

Best Publications

  • The Emotional Side of Prejudice: The Attribution of Secondary Emotions to Ingroups and Outgroups

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Paola M. Paladino;Ramon Rodriguez-Torres;Jeroen Vaes

  • Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups

    Jacques‐Philippe Leyens;Armando Rodriguez‐Perez;Ramon Rodriguez‐Torres;Ruth Gaunt

  • Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others

    Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Nick Haslam;Tess Murnane;Jeroen Vaes

  • Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences

    Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Stéphanie Demoulin;Jeroen Vaes;Ruth Gaunt

  • Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women

    Jeroen Vaes;Paola Paladino;Elisa Puvia

  • Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism - The 2002 Tajfel lecture

    Jacques‐Philippe Leyens;Brezo Cortes;Stéphanie Demoulin;Stéphanie Demoulin;John F. Dovidio

  • On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: the implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations.

    Jeroen Andre' Filip Vaes;M. P. Paladino;Luigi Alessandro Castelli;J. P. H. Leyens

  • We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup

    Jeroen Vaes;Jacques-Philippe Leyens;Maria Paola Paladino;Mariana Pires Miranda

  • Economic Inequality Is Linked to Biased Self-Perception

    Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Steve Loughnan;Peter Kuppens;Peter Kuppens;Jüri Allik;Katalin Balazs

  • Defensive dehumanization in the medical practice: A cross-sectional study from a health care worker's perspective

    Jeroen Vaes;Martina Muratore

  • Emotional prejudice can lead to infra-humanisation

    Stephanie Demoulin;Ramon Rodriguez Torres;Armando Rodriguez Perez;Jeroen Vaes

  • Humanness and dehumanization.

    Paul G. Bain;Jeroen Vaes;Jacques Philippe Leyens

  • The lost e-mail: prosocial reactions induced by uniquely human emotions.

    Jeroen Vaes;Maria-Paola Paladino;Jacques-Philippe Leyens

  • The uniquely human content of stereotypes

    Jeroen Vaes;Maria Paola Paladino

  • The Cognitive Representation of Self-Stereotyping

    Marcella Latrofa;Jeroen Andre' Filip Vaes;Maria Rosaria Cadinu;A. Carnaghi

  • Being a Body : Women’s Appearance Related Self-Views and their Dehumanization of Sexually Objectified Female Targets

    Elisa Puvia;Jeroen Vaes

  • "We are people": ingroup humanization as an existential defense.

    Jeroen Vaes;Nathan A. Heflick;Jamie L. Goldenberg

  • “United We Stand, Divided We Fall”! The Protective Function of Self‐Stereotyping for Stigmatised Members’ Psychological Well‐Being

    Marcella Latrofa;Jeroen Andre' Filip Vaes;Massimiliano Pastore;Maria Rosaria Cadinu

  • Exploring the role of culture in sexual objectification: A seven nations study

    Steve Loughnan;Silvia Fernandez-Campos;Jeroen Vaes;Gulnaz Anjum

  • Folk Conceptions of Humanness: Beliefs About Distinctive and Core Human Characteristics in Australia, Italy, and China

    Paul Bain;Jeroen Vaes;Yoshihisa Kashima;Nick Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Maria Paola Paladino
Maria Paola Paladino University of Trento
Jacques-Philippe Leyens
Jacques-Philippe Leyens Université Catholique de Louvain
Steve Loughnan
Steve Loughnan University of Edinburgh
Paul G. Bain
Paul G. Bain University of Bath
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón
Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón University of Granada
Jamie L. Goldenberg
Jamie L. Goldenberg University of South Florida
Brock Bastian
Brock Bastian University of Melbourne
Jeff Greenberg
Jeff Greenberg University of Arizona
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities opens several flexible online pathways, each designed to match different career goals. For those interested in mental health, a psychology online degree can lead to diverse fields, from counseling and human resources to community work. Affordability and program reputation should guide your choice.

If your ambition is to make a social impact, a masters in social work online offers accessible entry points and prepares graduates for licensure in various states. The right program can fast-track your move into social services, healthcare, or advocacy roles.

For students aiming to become licensed clinical psychologists, it’s essential to choose from accredited psyd programs. Accreditation ensures your education meets professional standards for eventual licensure and practice.

Finally, relational specialists can accelerate their training by considering lmft programs. These programs support careers in marriage and family therapy, with options designed for quicker completion.

Each pathway offers flexibility, career advancement, and the potential to make a meaningful impact in people's lives.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen Vaes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles