World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9139 8541 4847 4414 88 6582

John Ruscio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Ruscio between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Ruscio published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 2 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Ruscio: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 5
1999 0
2000 5
2001 4
2002 5
2003 1
2004 4
2005 0
2006 5
2007 7
2008 4
2009 8
2010 4
2011 2
2012 4
2013 12
2014 2
2015 5
2016 2
2017 7
2018 11
2019 2
2020 3
2021 4
2022 0
2023 1
2024 1
Total 113
Download as CSV

John Ruscio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ruscio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Ruscio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Ruscio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Ruscio is affiliated with the College of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and social sciences, with a focus on experimental, clinical, and cognitive psychology subfields, as well as aspects of management science, sociology, and political science.

Their recent publications include a range of studies in peer-reviewed journals. These are:

  • "Asking People to Explain Complex Policies Does Not Increase Political Moderation: Three Preregistered Failures to Closely Replicate Fernbach, Rogers, Fox, and Sloman's (2013) Findings" (2021, Psychological Science)
  • "The comparison data forest: A new comparison data approach to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis" (2023, Behavior Research Methods)
  • "Reexamining the latent structure of suicidal thoughts using taxometric analysis: Implications for testing ideation to action theoretical models of suicidal thoughts and behavior" (2021, Psychological Assessment)
  • "Performing Small-Telescopes Analysis by Resampling: Empirically Constructing Confidence Intervals and Estimating Statistical Power for Measures of Effect Size" (2024, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science)

The frequent coauthors collaborating with John Ruscio are:

  • Jarret T. Crawford
  • David Goretzko
  • Andy P. Siddaway
  • Jill M. Holm-Denoma
  • Tracy K. Witte

John Ruscio's work is commonly published in the following journals:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Psychological Science
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

The primary fields of study they contribute to include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

The subfields of study covered in their research are:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

The main research topics addressed in their work include:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Best Publications

  • A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: evidence for dimensionality.

    Jean-Pierre Guay;John Ruscio;Raymond A. Knight;Robert D. Hare

  • The latent structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: A taxometric investigation of reactions to extreme stress.

    Ayelet Meron Ruscio;John Ruscio;Terence M. Keane

  • Introduction to the Taxometric Method: A Practical Guide

    John Ruscio;Nick Haslam;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • Informing the continuity controversy: a taxometric analysis of depression.

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • Looking Inside the Fishbowl of Creativity: Verbal and Behavioral Predictors of Creative Performance

    John Ruscio;Dean M. Whitney;Teresa M. Amabile

  • A Taxometric Investigation of the Latent Structure of Worry

    Ayelet Meron Ruscio;T. D. Borkovec;John Ruscio

  • Creativity in Context

    Unknown

  • Applying the Bootstrap to Taxometric Analysis: Generating Empirical Sampling Distributions to Help Interpret Results.

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio;Mati Meron

  • The latent structure of analogue depression: should the Beck Depression Inventory be used to classify groups?

    Ayelet Meron Ruscio;John Ruscio

  • Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.

    John Ruscio;Glenn D. Walters;David K. Marcus;Walter Kaczetow

  • Clarifying boundary issues in psychopathology: the role of taxometrics in a comprehensive program of structural research.

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • Taxometric Analysis: An Empirically Grounded Approach to Implementing the Method

    John Ruscio

  • Using taxometric analysis to distinguish a small latent taxon from a latent dimension with positively skewed indicators: The case of involuntary defeat syndrome

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio;Terence M. Keane

  • Detecting small taxa using simulated comparison data : A reanalysis of beach, amir, and bau's (2005) data

    John Ruscio;David K. Marcus

  • A structure-based approach to psychological assessment: matching measurement models to latent structure.

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • TAXOMETRIC EVIDENCE FOR THE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF CLUSTER-C, PARANOID, AND BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDERS

    Arnoud Arntz;David Bernstein;Dominique Gielen;Myrthe van Nieuwenhuyzen

  • Categories and Dimensions Advancing Psychological Science Through the Study of Latent Structure

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • Administering Quizzes at Random To Increase Students' Reading.

    John Ruscio

  • A Nontechnical Introduction to the Taxometric Method

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio

  • To sum or not to sum: Taxometric analysis with ordered categorical assessment items.

    Glenn D. Walters;John Ruscio

  • Performing Taxometric Analysis to Distinguish Categorical and Dimensional Variables.

    John Ruscio;Ayelet Meron Ruscio;Lauren M. Carney

Frequent Co-Authors

Ayelet Meron Ruscio
Ayelet Meron Ruscio University of Pennsylvania
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Glenn D. Walters
Glenn D. Walters Kutztown University
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
Steven Jay Lynn
Steven Jay Lynn Binghamton University
Jarret T. Crawford
Jarret T. Crawford College of New Jersey
Teresa M. Amabile
Teresa M. Amabile Harvard University
David K. Marcus
David K. Marcus Washington State University
Robert D. Hare
Robert D. Hare University of British Columbia
Raymond A. Knight
Raymond A. Knight Brandeis University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open many doors, including specialized roles in behavioral analysis, counseling, and therapy. For those looking to work closely with individuals affected by behavioral or developmental challenges, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a compelling path. Each region may have different expectations and requirements for this career.

If you’re interested in becoming a BCBA in Fremont, you’ll need to meet local educational and certification standards. Similarly, understanding the Fresno BCBA education requirements can help you plan the necessary steps in Central California.

Those interested in opportunities in Texas should research the Garland BCBA education requirements. Meanwhile, in Arizona, the Gilbert BCBA education requirements can guide your journey.

Many universities offer online psychology degrees that can lay the foundation for these careers. By understanding regional BCBA pathways, students can match their education to local demand and work settings, building a flexible, future-ready career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing John Ruscio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles