World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6296
World Ranking
9167
National Ranking
4860

David K. Marcus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Marcus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 149 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David K. Marcus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Marcus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David K. Marcus is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States and has focused research efforts primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and archeology.

The central research topics explored by Marcus include personality disorders and psychopathology, personality traits and psychology, mental health research topics, resilience and mental health, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, conflict of laws and jurisdiction, and crime patterns and interventions.

Marcus has contributed to the academic literature with recent papers such as:

  • "A Network Approach to Understanding Narcissistic Grandiosity via the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory" (2021), published in Self and Identity
  • "Item response theory analysis of the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure." (2021), published in Psychological Assessment
  • "Bipolar disorders and narcissism: Diagnostic concerns, conceptual commonalities and potential antecedents" (2022), published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "Community Service Outcomes in Justice-Involved Youth: Comparing Restorative Community Service to Standard Community Service" (2021), published in Criminal Justice and Behavior
  • "Construction and Preliminary Validation of Machiavellianism Scales From the HEXACO-100" (2022), published in Assessment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Marcus include:

  • Madeline G. Nagel
  • Virgil Zeigler-Hill
  • Alexa M. Lambros
  • Keira L Monaghan
  • Brian F. French

Marcus has published extensively in venues such as:

  • Psychological Assessment
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Criminal Justice and Behavior
  • Assessment

Their book publications include titles released by Gorgias Press such as "The Masorah of the Former Prophets in the Leningrad Codex" in 2020 and 2022. Another publication appeared with the eBooks publisher titled ": " in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Psychopathic, not psychopath: taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy.

    John F. Edens;David K. Marcus;Scott O. Lilienfeld;Norman G. Poythress Jr.

  • A Taxometric Analysis of Psychopathic Personality

    David K. Marcus;Siji L. John;John F. Edens

  • Cognitive and perceptual variables in hypochondriasis and health anxiety: a systematic review.

    David K. Marcus;Jessica R. Gurley;Melynda M. Marchi;Craig Bauer

  • Are the Parts as Good as the Whole? A Meta-Analysis of Component Treatment Studies

    Erin C. Bell;David K. Marcus;James K. Goodlad

  • Evidence-based apps? A review of mental health mobile applications in a psychotherapy context.

    Joyce H. L. Lui;David K. Marcus;Christopher T. Barry

  • The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: Evidence from the Psychopathic Personality Inventory.

    David K. Marcus;Jessica J. Fulton;John F. Edens

  • Does attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a dimensional latent structure? A taxometric analysis.

    David K. Marcus;Tammy D. Barry

  • Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: a taxometric analysis.

    Daniel C. Murrie;David K. Marcus;Kevin S. Douglas;Zina Lee

  • The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defenses

    Jessica R. Gurley;David K. Marcus

  • Is the Dodo bird endangered in the 21st century? A meta-analysis of treatment comparison studies.

    David K. Marcus;Debra O'Connell;Alyssa L. Norris;Abere Sawaqdeh

  • Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests.

    John Ruscio;Glenn D. Walters;David K. Marcus;Walter Kaczetow

  • Creative music therapy : a guide to fostering clinical musicianship

    Unknown

  • The Psychology of Spite and the Measurement of Spitefulness

    David K. Marcus;Virgil Zeigler-Hill;Sterett H. Mercer;Alyssa L. Norris

  • Lead and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms: A meta-analysis

    James K. Goodlad;David K. Marcus;Jessica J. Fulton

  • Is antisocial personality disorder continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis.

    David K. Marcus;Scott O. Lilienfeld;John F. Edens;Norman G. Poythress

  • A Big Tent of Dark Personality Traits

    David K. Marcus;Virgil Zeigler‐Hill

  • Health Anxiety, Rumination, and Negative Affect: A Mediational Analysis

    David K. Marcus;Kathleen T. Hughes;Randolph C. Arnau

  • A network of dark personality traits: What lies at the heart of darkness?

    David K. Marcus;Jonathan Preszler;Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  • Lead and conduct problems: a meta-analysis.

    David K. Marcus;Jessica J. Fulton;Erin J. Clarke

  • Detecting small taxa using simulated comparison data : A reanalysis of beach, amir, and bau's (2005) data

    John Ruscio;David K. Marcus

  • Studying psychotherapy using the one-with-many design: The therapeutic alliance as an exemplar.

    David K. Marcus;Deborah A. Kashy;Scott A. Baldwin

  • Depression and interpersonal rejection

    David K. Marcus

  • Sex Differences in Judgments of Physical Attractiveness: A Social Relations Analysis

    David K. Marcus;Rowland S. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Edens
John F. Edens Texas A&M University
Virgil Zeigler-Hill
Virgil Zeigler-Hill Oakland University
Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld Emory University
John Ruscio
John Ruscio College of New Jersey
Marcus T. Boccaccini
Marcus T. Boccaccini Sam Houston State University
Deborah A. Kashy
Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University
Norman G. Poythress
Norman G. Poythress University of South Florida
Emil F. Coccaro
Emil F. Coccaro The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Glenn D. Walters
Glenn D. Walters Kutztown University
Daniel C. Murrie
Daniel C. Murrie University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology can open doors to several rewarding career pathways in the mental health field. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a mental health counselor, which allows you to make a difference in your community while building a stable career.

Aspiring counselors should be aware that licensure and educational requirements vary by location. For instance, if you want to become a mental health counselor in Saint Paul, there are specific steps and local requirements to consider. Similarly, you should research the San Antonio mental health counselor certification requirements as these can differ from other states or cities.

Those interested in California can review the San Diego mental health counselor education requirements and learn more about how to become a mental health counselor in San Francisco. No matter your location, selecting an accredited online psychology degree can help you meet state-specific requirements and prepare you for licensure, certification, and a fulfilling career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing David K. Marcus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles