World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
5525
World Ranking
8635
National Ranking
4600

Daniel C. Murrie publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Murrie sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 143 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel C. Murrie D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel C. Murrie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel C. Murrie is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, law, and pharmacy as notable subfields.

Their work addresses several main topics, including psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, and sexual offending; criminal justice and corrections analysis; healthcare decision-making and restraints; deception detection and forensic psychology; medical malpractice and liability issues; crime patterns and interventions; and sexual assault and victimization studies.

Frequent publication venues for Daniel C. Murrie's research include:

  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment

Notable recent papers authored by Daniel C. Murrie are:

  • "Competency to stand trial evaluations: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports," 2020, Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • "Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national "competency crisis"," 2023, Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • "The impact of misdemeanor arrests on forensic mental health services: A state-wide review of Virginia competence to stand trial evaluations," 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law

Other prominent papers in which Daniel C. Murrie is not listed as the primary author but appear related to their research context include:

  • "Statement of concerned experts on the use of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in capital sentencing to assess risk for institutional violence," 2020, Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • "Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis," 2021, Psychological Assessment

Daniel C. Murrie collaborates frequently with other researchers, including Marcus T. Boccaccini, Brett O. Gardner, Ira K. Packer, Angela N. Torres, and Gabriele Trupp.

In addition to journal publications, they have contributed to books published by RAND Corporation eBooks, including:

  • "Estimating the Size of the Los Angeles County Jail Mental Health Population Appropriate for Release into Community Services," 2020
  • "Los Angeles County Jails Could Divert More Individuals to Community-Based Mental Health Services," 2020

Best Publications

  • Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Lucy A. Guarnera;Katrina A. Rufino

  • Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Darrel B. Turner;Meredith Meeks

  • Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised.

    Samuel W. Hawes;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie

  • Asperger's Syndrome in Forensic Settings

    Daniel C. Murrie;Janet I. Warren;Marianne Kristiansson;Park E. Dietz

  • Psychopathy scores and violence among juvenile offenders: a multi-measure study.

    Daniel C. Murrie;Dewey G. Cornell;Sebastian Kaplan;David McConville

  • Youth with psychopathy features are not a discrete class: a taxometric analysis.

    Daniel C. Murrie;David K. Marcus;Kevin S. Douglas;Zina Lee

  • Psychopathy screening of incarcerated juveniles: a comparison of measures.

    Daniel C. Murrie;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Does interrater (dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Jeremy T. Johnson;Chelsea Janke

  • DO SOME EVALUATORS REPORT CONSISTENTLY HIGHER OR LOWER PCL-R SCORES THAN OTHERS? Findings From a Statewide Sample of Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Darrel B. Turner;Daniel C. Murrie

  • The Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory and Psychopathy

    Daniel C. Murrie;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Reformulating Suicide Risk Formulation: From Prediction to Prevention

    Anthony R. Pisani;Daniel C. Murrie;Morton M. Silverman

  • Forensic Assessment of Violence Risk: A Guide for Risk Assessment and Risk Management

    Mary Alice Conroy;Daniel C. Murrie

  • Diagnostic labeling in juvenile court: How do descriptions of psychopathy and conduct disorder influence judges?

    Daniel C. Murrie;Marcus T. Boccaccini;Wendy McCoy;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Internal Consistency Reliability of the Self-Report Antisocial Process Screening Device.

    Norman G. Poythress;Kevin S. Douglas;Kevin S. Douglas;Diana Falkenbach;Diana Falkenbach;Keith Cruise

  • Field validity of the STATIC-99 and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;Jennifer D. Caperton;Samuel W. Hawes

  • Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.

    Janet I. Warren;Daniel C. Murrie;William Stejskal;Lori H. Colwell

  • Psychopathy, conduct disorder, and stigma: does diagnostic labeling influence juvenile probation officer recommendations?

    Daniel C. Murrie;Dewey G. Cornell;Wendy K. McCoy

  • Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: how do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors?

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;John W. Clark;Dewey G. Cornell

  • Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.

    Janet I. Warren;Daniel C. Murrie;Preeti Chauhan;Park E. Dietz

  • Screening for Malingering in a Criminal-Forensic Sample with the Personality Assessment Inventory.

    Marcus T. Boccaccini;Daniel C. Murrie;Scott A. Duncan

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus T. Boccaccini
Marcus T. Boccaccini Sam Houston State University
Samuel W. Hawes
Samuel W. Hawes Florida International University
Janet I. Warren
Janet I. Warren University of Virginia
Craig E. Henderson
Craig E. Henderson Sam Houston State University
Dewey G. Cornell
Dewey G. Cornell University of Virginia
Kevin S. Douglas
Kevin S. Douglas Simon Fraser University
John F. Edens
John F. Edens Texas A&M University
Itiel E. Dror
Itiel E. Dror University College London
Stephen D. Hart
Stephen D. Hart Simon Fraser University
Norman G. Poythress
Norman G. Poythress University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open the door to many rewarding online degrees and career pathways. One of the most impactful roles is that of a substance abuse counselor, a career that continues to grow in demand nationwide.

Each state and city may have specific requirements for entering this field. For example, if you are interested in the substance abuse counselor requirements in Denver, you’ll find details on education, licensing, and field experience needed to practice.

Those exploring how to become a substance abuse counselor in Detroit and the Durham substance abuse counselors education requirements will also notice differences in mandatory state licensure, supervised clinical hours, and continuing education.

Additionally, understanding the El Paso substance abuse counselor certification requirements is essential for those looking to work in Texas.

Many universities now offer flexible online degree programs, making it easier to meet coursework and training requirements. Exploring these pathways can help you make informed choices about your psychology career, no matter where you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel C. Murrie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles