World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10450 9782 5490 5012 69 5571

Janet I. Warren publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet I. Warren between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet I. Warren published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2008. 6 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 6 publications
1988 2025

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet I. Warren: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 3
2006 3
2007 1
2008 6
2009 5
2010 0
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 1
2015 2
2016 3
2017 3
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 6
Total 80
Download as CSV

Janet I. Warren publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet I. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 69
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet I. Warren D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet I. Warren sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet I. Warren is a researcher affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their work spans multiple facets of social sciences and psychology, with particular attention to issues related to violence, abuse, and extremist behavior. The main fields of study include social sciences and psychology, further detailed into subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, and health.

The research topics covered by Janet I. Warren focus primarily on violence and trauma, including intimate partner and family violence, homicide, infanticide, child abuse, terrorism and political violence, criminal justice and corrections analysis, and studies on suicide and self-harm.

Among their notable recent publications are:

  • "The lethality of non-familial child abductions: Characteristics and outcomes of 565 incidents involving youth under the age of 18 years" (2020), published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • "Using the moral-situational action violence risk model for assessing women involved in extremist violence: An empirical study." (2020), published in Journal of Threat Assessment and Management
  • "Victim selection patterns of community-residing child molesters identified by a nationwide youth-serving organization" (2021), published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
  • "Using the Moral-Situational-Action Model of Extremist Violence (MSA-EV) to Assess Fluctuating Levels of Risk in Women: The Relevance of Risk, Promotive, and Protective Factors" (2025), published in Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Janet I. Warren has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Anita A. Grabowska, James C. Reed, April Celeste R. Leviton, Terri D. Patterson, and Gregory B. Saathoff. These collaborations reflect shared scholarly interests particularly in the areas of violence risk assessment and victimology.

The researcher's studies have appeared predominantly in the journals Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, indicating a strong focus on applied research in legal and threat assessment contexts.

Best Publications

  • Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders.

    Dewey G. Cornell;Janet Warren;Gary Hawk;Ed Stafford

  • The sexually sadistic criminal and his offenses.

    Park Elliott Dietz;Robert R. Hazelwood;Janet Warren

  • Threatening and Otherwise Inappropriate Letters to Hollywood Celebrities

    PE Dietz;DB Matthews;C Van Duyne;DA Martell

  • Psychopathy in women: structural modeling and comorbidity.

    Janet I Warren;Mandi L Burnette;Susan C South;Preeti Chauhan

  • The Sexually Sadistic Serial Killer

    Janet I. Warren;Robert R. Hazelwood;Park E. Dietz

  • Asperger's Syndrome in Forensic Settings

    Daniel C. Murrie;Janet I. Warren;Marianne Kristiansson;Park E. Dietz

  • Crime Scene and Distance Correlates of Serial Rape

    Janet Warren;Roland Reboussin;Robert R. Hazelwood;Andrea Cummings

  • Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress.

    Park Elliott Dietz;Daryl B. Matthews;Daniel Allen Martell;Tracy M. Stewart

  • Personality disorders and violence among female prison inmates.

    Janet I. Warren;Mandi Burnette;Susan Carol South;Preeti Chauhan

  • Predicting Rapist Type from Crime-Scene Variables:

    Raymond A. Knight;Janet I. Warren;Roland Reboussin;Bonita J. Soley

  • Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime

    Robert R. Hazelwood;Janet I. Warren

  • Exploring gender differences in trauma exposure and the emergence of symptoms of PTSD among incarcerated men and women

    Irina Alexandrovna Komarovskaya;Ann Booker Loper;Janet Warren;Shelly Jackson

  • Understanding the risk factors for violence and criminality in women: The concurrent validity of the PCL-R and HCR-20

    Janet I. Warren;Susan C. South;Mandi L. Burnette;Allison Rogers

  • Psychiatric symptoms, history of victimization, and violent behavior among incarcerated female felons: an American perspective.

    Janet I Warren;Susan Hurt;Ann Booker Loper;Risha Bale

  • Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.

    Janet I. Warren;Daniel C. Murrie;William Stejskal;Lori H. Colwell

  • The Role of Impulsivity in Antisocial and Violent Behavior and Personality Disorders Among Incarcerated Women

    Irina Komarovskaya;Ann Booker Loper;Janet Warren

  • Exploring Prison Adjustment among Female Inmates Issues of Measurement and Prediction

    Janet I. Warren;Susan Hurt;Ann Booker Loper;Preeti Chauhan

  • Comparing the constructs of antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy in a sample of incarcerated women.

    Janet I. Warren;Susan C. South

  • Opinion formation in evaluating sanity at the time of the offense: an examination of 5175 pre-trial evaluations.

    Janet I. Warren;Daniel C. Murrie;Preeti Chauhan;Park E. Dietz

  • The sexually violent offender : Impulsive or ritualistic?

    Robert R Hazelwood;Janet I Warren

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel C. Murrie
Daniel C. Murrie University of Virginia
Susan C. South
Susan C. South Purdue University West Lafayette
Barry Rosenfeld
Barry Rosenfeld Fordham University
Donald E. Brown
Donald E. Brown University of Virginia
Kirk Heilbrun
Kirk Heilbrun Drexel University
Raymond A. Knight
Raymond A. Knight Brandeis University
Craig E. Henderson
Craig E. Henderson Sam Houston State University
Dewey G. Cornell
Dewey G. Cornell University of Virginia
Marcus T. Boccaccini
Marcus T. Boccaccini Sam Houston State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open doors to many fulfilling careers, such as counseling, research, social work, and human resources. For those seeking additional or alternative career options, an online degree in social work is a popular and practical choice. Social work programs often overlap with psychology, focusing on understanding human behavior, supporting communities, and helping people overcome challenges.

If you’re interested in pursuing an affordable online social work degree, there are a range of options available across the United States. For students in the Southeast, check out the cheapest social work degrees in Atlanta. You’ll also find competitive programs in the Southwest with the cheapest social work degrees in Arizona.

If your studies take you to New England, review the cheapest social work programs in Boston for valuable local options. And for West Coast learners, explore the cheapest social work degrees in California to find programs that fit your needs and budget.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees make it easier than ever to study flexibly and step confidently into a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Janet I. Warren

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles