World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Danny Huylebroeck

Danny Huylebroeck

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 77 1114 993 29 27 204 20756

Danny Huylebroeck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danny Huylebroeck between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danny Huylebroeck published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2000. 9 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2000. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 2 publications
1979 2026

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danny Huylebroeck: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 2
1981 4
1982 1
1983 2
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 5
1991 3
1992 0
1993 3
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 6
1998 9
1999 9
2000 17
2001 10
2002 4
2003 9
2004 2
2005 8
2006 7
2007 8
2008 4
2009 10
2010 2
2011 5
2012 12
2013 8
2014 5
2015 5
2016 11
2017 8
2018 4
2019 2
2020 11
2021 9
2022 6
2023 16
2024 7
2025 7
2026 2
Total 253
Download as CSV

Danny Huylebroeck publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny Huylebroeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 204 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100 204
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Danny Huylebroeck D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny Huylebroeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Danny Huylebroeck is affiliated with the Erasmus MC in the Netherlands, focusing primarily on research within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. The scientist's work covers various subfields including molecular biology, genetics, immunology, surgery, and oncology.

The range of topics across their publications highlights research interests in:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Microtubule and Mitosis Dynamics
  • Congenital Gastrointestinal and Neural Anomalies
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

Some recent notable papers include:

  • Heterogeneity and clonal relationships of adaptive immune cells in ulcerative colitis revealed by single-cell analyses, 2020, Science Immunology
  • Cardiomyocytes stimulate angiogenesis after ischemic injury in a ZEB2-dependent manner, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Steroid-resistant human inflammatory ILC2s are marked by CD45RO and elevated in type 2 respiratory diseases, 2021, Science Immunology
  • The EMT Transcription Factor ZEB2 Promotes Proliferation of Primary and Metastatic Melanoma While Suppressing an Invasive, Mesenchymal-Like Phenotype, 2020, Cancer Research
  • Interplay between the EMT Transcription Factors ZEB1 and ZEB2 regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell differentiation and hematopoietic lineage fidelity, 2021, PLoS Biology

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, notably:

  • Wilfred F. J. van IJcken
  • Andrea Conidi
  • Rutger W. W. Brouwer
  • Anne L. Korporaal
  • Frank Grosveld

Thebody of published work appears in multiple prominent venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Science Immunology
  • Nature Communications
  • Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • The Two-Handed E Box Binding Zinc Finger Protein SIP1 Downregulates E-Cadherin and Induces Invasion

    Joke Comijn;Geert Berx;Petra Vermassen;Kristin Verschueren

  • Identification of a potent Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor as a homologue of activin A.

    J C Smith;B M Price;K Van Nimmen;Danny Huylebroeck

  • Presenilin 2 deficiency causes a mild pulmonary phenotype and no changes in amyloid precursor protein processing but enhances the embryonic lethal phenotype of presenilin 1 deficiency

    An Herreman;Dieter Hartmann;Wim Annaert;Paul Saftig

  • Osteogenic protein-1 binds to activin type II receptors and induces certain activin-like effects.

    H Yamashita;P ten Dijke;D Huylebroeck;T K Sampath

  • SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5'-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes.

    Kristin Verschueren;Jacques E. Remacle;Clara Collart;Clara Collart;Harry Kraft;Harry Kraft

  • In vitro mutagenesis of a full-length cDNA clone of Semliki Forest virus: the small 6,000-molecular-weight membrane protein modulates virus release

    P Liljeström;S Lusa;Danny Huylebroeck;H Garoff

  • Smad5 knockout mice die at mid-gestation due to multiple embryonic and extraembryonic defects

    H Chang;Danny Huylebroeck;K Verschueren;Qiuxia Guo

  • Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis.

    Jan Hellemans;Olena Preobrazhenska;Andy Willaert;Philippe Debeer

  • Distinct spatial and temporal expression patterns of two type I receptors for bone morphogenetic proteins during mouse embryogenesis

    N Dewulf;K Verschueren;O Lonnoy;A Morén

  • Mice lacking ZFHX1B, the gene that codes for Smad-interacting protein-1, reveal a role for multiple neural crest cell defects in the etiology of Hirschsprung disease-mental retardation syndrome.

    Tom Van de Putte;Mitsuji Maruhashi;Annick Francis;Lucien Nelles

  • Endocardial cushion and myocardial defects after cardiac myocyte-specific conditional deletion of the bone morphogenetic protein receptor ALK3

    Vinciane Gaussin;Tom Van de Putte;Yuji Mishina;Mark C. Hanks

  • New mode of DNA binding of multi‐zinc finger transcription factors: δEF1 family members bind with two hands to two target sites

    Jacques E. Remacle;Harry Kraft;Walter Lerchner;Gunther Wuytens

  • Epidermal differentiation does not involve the pro-apoptotic executioner caspases, but is associated with caspase-14 induction and processing.

    Saskia Lippens;M Kockx;M Knaapen;L Mortier

  • The mammalian gene function resource: the international knockout mouse consortium

    Allan Bradley;Konstantinos Anastassiadis;Abdelkader Ayadi;James F. Battey

  • Antigenic drift between the haemagglutinin of the Hong Kong influenza strains A/Aichi/2/68 and A/Victoria/3/75.

    Martine Verhoeyen;Rongxiang Fang;Willy Min Jou;René Devos

  • Follistatins neutralize activin bioactivity by inhibition of activin binding to its type II receptors.

    J. P. De Winter;P. Ten Dijke;C. J. M. De Vries;T. A. E. Van Achterberg

  • Complete structure of the hemagglutinin gene from the human influenza A/Victoria/3/75 (H3N2) strain as determined from cloned DNA

    Willy Min Jou;Martine Verhoeyen;René Devos;Eric Saman

  • Overexpression of activin A in the skin of transgenic mice reveals new activities of activin in epidermal morphogenesis, dermal fibrosis and wound repair.

    Barbara Munz;Barbara Munz;Hans Smola;Felix Engelhardt;Felix Engelhardt;Kerstin Bleuel

  • Heterozygous missense mutations in SMARCA2 cause Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome

    Jeroen K.J. Van Houdt;Beata Anna Nowakowska;Sérgio B. Sousa;Sérgio B. Sousa;Barbera D.C. Van Schaik

  • Stalk Cell Phenotype Depends on Integration of Notch and Smad1/5 Signaling Cascades

    Iván M. Moya;Lieve Umans;Elke Maas;Paulo N.G. Pereira

Frequent Co-Authors

An Zwijsen
An Zwijsen KU Leuven
Jody J. Haigh
Jody J. Haigh University of Manitoba
James C. Smith
James C. Smith The Francis Crick Institute
Geert Berx
Geert Berx Ghent University
Walter Fiers
Walter Fiers Ghent University
Leo A. van Grunsven
Leo A. van Grunsven Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Hisato Kondoh
Hisato Kondoh Kyoto Sangyo University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths and online degree options. Many students consider complementary or alternative routes, including healthcare and allied sciences, that can be pursued remotely for greater flexibility and faster entry into the job market.

For those interested in speech and language sciences, an slp bridge program offers a transition for non-SLP majors aiming for a role in speech-language pathology. Alternatively, individuals with a molecular biology background who want to enter nursing without previous nursing education might consider enrolling in one of the best online bsn programs for non nurses to accelerate their academic journey.

Career changers often look into advanced healthcare roles, such as nurse practitioners. Understanding psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state helps prospective students compare earning potential across locations. Moreover, if advancing quickly is a priority, investigating how to become a np in the shortest possible time can provide a clear, actionable path forward.

Whether your interests remain in molecular biology or expand into related medical fields, flexible online pathways are available to support diverse career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Danny Huylebroeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles