World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
133
Citations
69554
World Ranking
372
National Ranking
245

Medicine

D-Index
133
Citations
69603
World Ranking
2209
National Ranking
1246

Martin M. Matzuk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Matzuk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 494 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Martin M. Matzuk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin M. Matzuk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin M. Matzuk is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields such as Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, and Immunology.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to sperm and testicular function, reproductive biology and fertility, genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities, CRISPR and genetic engineering, reproductive system and pregnancy, endometriosis research and treatment, and protein degradation and inhibitors.

Among the recent publications are several papers notable for their focus on male fertility and reproductive mechanisms:

  • Sperm proteins SOF1, TMEM95, and SPACA6 are required for sperm−oocyte fusion in mice, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • NELL2-mediated lumicrine signaling through OVCH2 is required for male fertility, 2020, Science
  • Spermatozoa lacking Fertilization Influencing Membrane Protein (FIMP) fail to fuse with oocytes in mice, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • ARMC12 regulates spatiotemporal mitochondrial dynamics during spermiogenesis and is required for male fertility, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Large-scale discovery of male reproductive tract-specific genes through analysis of RNA-seq datasets, 2020, BMC Biology

They have collaborated frequently with other researchers, with coauthorship counts highlighting the following individuals:

  • Masahito Ikawa (41 publications)
  • Zhifeng Yu (26 publications)
  • Kaori Nozawa (21 publications)
  • Feng Li (19 publications)
  • Diana Monsivais (16 publications)

The scientist's work has appeared mainly in the following venues, reflecting a consistent publication record in specialized journals:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (16 publications)
  • Biology of Reproduction (12 publications)
  • Andrology (7 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (5 publications)
  • Nature Communications (4 publications)

Best Publications

  • Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis

    Dong J;Albertini Df;Nishimori K;Kumar Tr

  • Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not male fertility.

    T R Kumar;Y Wang;N Lu;M M Matzuk

  • Neurodegeneration, myocardial injury, and perinatal death in mitochondrial superoxide dismutase-deficient mice.

    Russell M. Lebovitz;Heju Zhang;Hannes Vogel;Joiner Cartwright

  • Social amnesia in mice lacking the oxytocin gene.

    Jennifer N. Ferguson;Larry J. Young;Elizabeth F. Hearn;Martin M. Matzuk

  • Continuous fatty acid oxidation and reduced fat storage in mice lacking acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2.

    Lutfi Abu-Elheiga;Martin M. Matzuk;Khaled A. H. Abo-Hashema;Salih J. Wakil

  • The biology of infertility: research advances and clinical challenges

    Martin M Matzuk;Dolores J Lamb

  • Genetic analysis of the mammalian transforming growth factor-beta superfamily.

    Hua Chang;Chester W. Brown;Martin M. Matzuk

  • Intercellular Communication in the Mammalian Ovary: Oocytes Carry the Conversation

    Martin M. Matzuk;Kathleen H. Burns;Maria M. Viveiros;John J. Eppig

  • Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function.

    Changning Yan;Pei Wang;Janet DeMayo;Francesco J. DeMayo

  • Alpha-inhibin is a tumour-suppressor gene with gonadal specificity in mice.

    Martin M. Matzuk;Milton J. Finegold;Jyan-Gwo J. Su;Aaron J. W. Hsueh

  • Anti-Müllerian Hormone Attenuates the Effects of FSH on Follicle Development in the Mouse Ovary

    Alexandra L. L. Durlinger;Maria J. G. Gruijters;Piet Kramer;Bas Karels

  • Different phenotypes for mice deficient in either activins or activin receptor type II

    Martin M. Matzuk;T. Rajendra Kumar;Allan Bradley

  • THE MAMMALIAN OVARY FROM GENESIS TO REVELATION

    Mark A. Edson;Ankur K. Nagaraja;Martin M. Matzuk

  • Pervasive social deficits, but normal parturition, in oxytocin receptor-deficient mice

    Yuki Takayanagi;Masahide Yoshida;Isadora F. Bielsky;Heather E. Ross

  • Oxytocin is required for nursing but is not essential for parturition or reproductive behavior

    Katsuhiko Nishimori;Larry J. Young;Qiuxia Guo;Zuoxin Wang

  • Genetic dissection of mammalian fertility pathways.

    Martin M Matzuk;Dolores J Lamb

  • Multiple defects and perinatal death in mice deficient in follistatin

    Martin M. Matzuk;Nalfang Lu;Hannes Vogel;Klaus Sellheyer

  • Paracrine Actions Of Growth Differentiation Factor-9 in the Mammalian Ovary

    Julia A. Elvin;Amander T. Clark;Pei Wang;Neil M. Wolfman

  • Math1 is essential for genesis of cerebellar granule neurons.

    Nissim Ben-Arie;Hugo J. Bellen;Dawna L. Armstrong;Alanna E. McCall

  • Functional analysis of activins during mammalian development

    Martin M. Matzuk;T. Rajendra Kumar;Anne Vassalli;Jackie R. Bickenbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen H. Burns
Kathleen H. Burns Harvard University
Francesco J. DeMayo
Francesco J. DeMayo National Institutes of Health
Wei Yan
Wei Yan University of Nevada Reno
Masahito Ikawa
Masahito Ikawa Osaka University
Chad J. Creighton
Chad J. Creighton Baylor College of Medicine
John J. Eppig
John J. Eppig Jackson Laboratory
Kate L Loveland
Kate L Loveland Hudson Institute of Medical Research
Aleksandar Rajkovic
Aleksandar Rajkovic University of California, San Francisco
Allan Bradley
Allan Bradley University of Cambridge
Teresa K. Woodruff
Teresa K. Woodruff Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways in the health sciences. For those interested in nutrition, pursuing an accelerated nutrition degree online is an excellent option. These programs help students complete their studies quickly, preparing them for roles in dietetics, wellness, and health education.

If management or leadership in healthcare appeals to you, the cheapest online mba in healthcare management programs provide valuable business and administrative skills for career advancement. These degrees are ideal for those aiming to manage clinics, hospitals, or other healthcare organizations efficiently.

For science grads looking to enter the growing field of healthcare information, becoming a certified professional coder is a highly respected pathway. This credential demonstrates expertise in medical coding, essential for accurate health records and billing.

Many ask what is medical coding salary before choosing this route. Entry-level positions are in high demand, offering competitive pay with opportunities for further growth in specialized coding or healthcare IT.

Best Scientists Citing Martin M. Matzuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles