World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
10371
World Ranking
5426
National Ranking
564

Itiel E. Dror publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Itiel E. Dror sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Itiel E. Dror D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Itiel E. Dror sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Itiel E. Dror is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of cognitive and social psychology with forensic science. Their work addresses issues related to human factors, cognitive biases, and decision-making processes within forensic contexts.

Dror has published extensively in various academic journals. Recent papers include:

  • Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias (2020), published in Analytical Chemistry
  • Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions (2021), published in Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias (2021), published in Forensic Science International Synergy
  • (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020), published in Forensic Science International Synergy
  • Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making (2022), published in Medicine Science and the Law

Their frequent co-authors include Jeff Kukucka, Judy Melinek, Sarah Hawkins, Daniel S. Atherton, and Jonathan L. Arden.

Dror's publications are often found in these venues:

  • Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Forensic Science International Synergy
  • Science & Justice
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Forensic Science International Mind and Law

Their research spans a number of subfields such as social psychology, sociology and political science, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. They focus on topics including:

  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Forensic and genetic research
  • Risk perception and management
  • Forensic anthropology and bioarchaeology studies
  • Psychology of moral and emotional judgment
  • Medical malpractice and liability issues
  • Autopsy techniques and outcomes

Best Publications

  • The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions.

    Saul M. Kassin;Itiel E. Dror;Jeff Kukucka

  • Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.

    Itiel E. Dror;David Charlton;Ailsa E. Péron

  • Why Experts Make Errors

    Itiel E. Dror;David Charlton

  • Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation

    Itiel E. Dror;Greg Hampikian

  • To be or Not to be: The Effects of Aging Stereotypes on the Will to Live:

    Becca Levy;Ori Ashman;Itiel Dror

  • Mental Imagery and Aging

    Itiel E. Dror;Stephen M. Kosslyn

  • The need for a research culture in the forensic sciences

    Jennifer L. Mnookin;Simon A. Cole;Itiel E. Dror;Barry A J Fisher

  • When emotions get the better of us: the effect of contextual top-down processing on matching fingerprints

    Itiel E. Dror;Ailsa E. Péron;Sara-Lynn Hind;David Charlton

  • Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts

    Itiel E. Dror;Robert Rosenthal

  • Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias

    Itiel E Dror

  • The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition

    Itiel E. Dror;Simon A. Cole

  • Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models

    Itiel E. Dror;Beth Basola;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Letter to the Editor- Context Management Toolbox: A Linear Sequential Unmasking (LSU) Approach for Minimizing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decision Making.

    Itiel E. Dror;J.D. William C. Thompson Ph.D.;Christian A. Meissner;Irv Kornfield

  • Optimising the Use of Note-Taking as an External Cognitive Aid for Increasing Learning.

    Tamas Makany;Jonathan Kemp;Itiel E. Dror;Itiel E. Dror

  • Technology enhanced learning: The good, the bad, and the ugly

    Itiel E. Dror

  • Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias

    Sherry Nakhaeizadeh;Itiel E. Dror;Ruth M. Morgan

  • Cognitive Bias and Blindness: A Global Survey of Forensic Science Examiners

    Jeff Kukucka;Saul M. Kassin;Patricia A. Zapf;Itiel E. Dror

  • Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.

    Itiel E. Dror;Christophe Champod;Glenn Langenburg;David Charlton

  • Visual-spatial abilities of pilots

    Itiel E Dror;Stephen Michael Kosslyn;Wayne L Waag

  • Mental imagery and aging.

    Unknown

  • The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences

    Jennifer Mnookin;Simon A. Cole;Itiel Dror;Barry A. J. Fisher

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul M. Kassin
Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Stephen M. Kosslyn
Stephen M. Kosslyn Harvard University
Stevan Harnad
Stevan Harnad University of Quebec at Montreal
Bruce Budowle
Bruce Budowle University of North Texas Health Science Center
Gary Wills
Gary Wills University of Southampton
Romola S. Bucks
Romola S. Bucks University of Western Australia
Daniel C. Murrie
Daniel C. Murrie University of Virginia
Philip J. Kellman
Philip J. Kellman University of California, Los Angeles
Robert Rosenthal
Robert Rosenthal University of California, Riverside
Christophe Champod
Christophe Champod University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a versatile field, offering numerous online degree options and diverse career pathways. Students can start with undergraduate programs and advance to master’s or doctoral levels. Many schools now offer online degrees in psychology or related disciplines, giving greater flexibility for learners balancing other commitments.

A popular specialization is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), leading to Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials. This path requires specific coursework and supervised fieldwork, followed by passing the BCBA exam. Local guides, such as those for becoming a bcba in Reno, offer detailed insights into education and licensing requirements for different regions.

Prospective students can explore targeted advice on becoming a bcba in Richmond, how to become a bcba in Riverside, or the specific Sacramento bcba education requirements. Each resource covers regional licensing details, certification steps, and practical experience guidelines. These pathways not only open doors to rewarding careers but also allow for impactful work supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Itiel E. Dror

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles