World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5947 5530 3229 2933 133 8920

Allison D. Redlich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Allison D. Redlich between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Allison D. Redlich published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 11 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
1996 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Allison D. Redlich: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 11
2006 9
2007 4
2008 5
2009 4
2010 11
2011 6
2012 9
2013 4
2014 5
2015 4
2016 9
2017 15
2018 5
2019 10
2020 9
2021 6
2022 4
2023 11
2024 6
2025 5
Total 167
Download as CSV

Allison D. Redlich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison D. Redlich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Allison D. Redlich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allison D. Redlich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Allison D. Redlich is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, clinical psychology, law, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their main topics of work cover various aspects of forensic psychology such as deception detection, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending, criminal justice and corrections analysis, law and judicial systems, memory processes, jury decision making, and criminal law and evidence.

Redlich has published extensively in several academic venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Journal of Experimental Criminology
  • Law and Human Behavior
  • The Wrongful Conviction Law Review
  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Legal and Criminological Psychology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Redlich include:

  • Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations (2025), Law and Human Behavior
  • Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond (2020), Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Urgent issues and prospects in reforming interrogation practices in the United States and Canada (2020), Legal and Criminological Psychology
  • False admissions of guilt associated with wrongful convictions undermine people's perceptions of exonerees (2020), Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Identifying Patterns Across the Six Canonical Factors Underlying Wrongful Convictions (2023), The Wrongful Conviction Law Review

Allison D. Redlich has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Mary Catlin
  • Samantha Luna
  • Christian A. Meissner
  • Talley Bettens
  • Jodi A. Quas

Their research contributions address various dimensions of wrongful convictions, interrogation practices, and the psychological mechanisms influencing legal processes.

Best Publications

  • Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.

    Saul M. Kassin;Steven A. Drizin;Thomas Grisso;Gisli H. Gudjonsson

  • Taking responsibility for an act not committed: the influence of age and suggestibility.

    Allison D. Redlich;Gail S. Goodman

  • A Prospective Study of Memory for Child Sexual Abuse New Findings Relevant to the Repressed-Memory Controversy

    Gail S. Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Jodi A. Quas;Robin S. Edelstein

  • Accusatorial and information-gathering interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions: a meta-analytic review

    Christian A. Meissner;Allison D. Redlich;Stephen W. Michael;Jacqueline R. Evans

  • Use of Leverage to Improve Adherence to Psychiatric Treatment in the Community

    John Monahan;Allison D. Redlich;Jeffrey Swanson;Pamela Clark Robbins

  • Effect of Mental Health Courts on Arrests and Jail Days: A Multisite Study

    Henry J. Steadman;Allison Redlich;Lisa Callahan;Pamela Clark Robbins

  • The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Traumatic Impact Predicts Long-Term Memory for Documented Child Sexual Abuse

    Kristen Weede Alexander;Jodi A. Quas;Gail S. Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Simona Ghetti

  • Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey.

    Allison D. Redlich;Henry J. Steadman;John Monahan;Pamela Clark Robbins

  • A Taxonomy of Interrogation Methods

    Christopher E. Kelly;Jeaneé C. Miller;Allison D. Redlich;Steven M. Kleinman

  • Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases.

    John E. B. Myers;Allison D. Redlich;Gail S. Goodman;Lori P. Prizmich

  • THE SECOND GENERATION OF MENTAL HEALTH COURTS

    Allison D. Redlich;Henry J. Steadman;John Monahan;John Petrila

  • From referral to disposition: case processing in seven mental health courts.

    Henry J. Steadman;Allison D. Redlich;Patricia Griffin;John Petrila

  • Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness

    Allison D. Redlich;Alicia Summers;Steven Hoover

  • AN EXPLICIT TEST OF PLEA BARGAINING IN THE “SHADOW OF THE TRIAL”†

    Shawn D. Bushway;Allison D. Redlich;Robert J. Norris

  • Childhood sexual assault victims: long-term outcomes after testifying in criminal court.

    Jodi A Quas;Gail S Goodman;Simona Ghetti;Kristen W Alexander

  • Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency*

    Simona Ghetti;Allison D. Redlich

  • Pre‐adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults

    Allison D. Redlich;B A Melissa Silverman;Hans Steiner

  • Individual Differences in Emotional Memory: Adult Attachment and Long-Term Memory for Child Sexual Abuse

    Robin S. Edelstein;Simona Ghetti;Jodi A. Quas;Gail S. Goodman

  • Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions

    Christian A. Meissner;Allison D. Redlich;Sujeeta Bhatt;Susan Brandon

  • Effect of Mental Health Courts on Arrests and Jail Days

    Henry J. Steadman;Allison Redlich;Lisa Callahan;Pamela Clark Robbins

Frequent Co-Authors

Gail S. Goodman
Gail S. Goodman University of California, Davis
Jodi A. Quas
Jodi A. Quas University of California, Irvine
Simona Ghetti
Simona Ghetti University of California, Davis
Henry J. Steadman
Henry J. Steadman Policy Research Associates
Saul M. Kassin
Saul M. Kassin John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Robin S. Edelstein
Robin S. Edelstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christian A. Meissner
Christian A. Meissner Iowa State University
Shawn D. Bushway
Shawn D. Bushway University at Albany, State University of New York
Hans Steiner
Hans Steiner Stanford University
Richard A. Leo
Richard A. Leo University of San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and specialized career pathways across the United States. One popular path is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), but each city or state often has its own unique requirements for education, supervised experience, and certification.

For example, those considering Portland mft education requirements will find specific guidelines on accredited graduate programs and state licensing exams. Similarly, if you are interested in this profession in North Carolina, you can learn about the process through resources outlining how to become a marriage and family therapist in Raleigh.

Requirements can also differ across other locations, such as the steps involved to meet mft requirements in Reno. In Virginia, you might explore the Richmond mft certification requirements, which detail the local expectations for clinical hours and exams.

Exploring these region-specific online degrees and requirements can help you find the right educational path and prepare effectively for a rewarding career in Psychology or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Allison D. Redlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles