World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
9838
World Ranking
6881
National Ranking
3732

Kathleen J. Sternberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen J. Sternberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kathleen J. Sternberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen J. Sternberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathleen J. Sternberg is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional background is grounded in biomedical research within a leading government health organization.

The provided data does not list specific research papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Sternberg, which limits detailed insights into their publication record or collaborative network.

There are no main fields, subfields of study, or topics listed for their research activities. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been recorded in the dataset provided.

This absence of detailed information suggests that publicly available records on their scientific contributions might be limited or not centralized within commonly accessed databases.

Best Publications

  • Effects of domestic violence on children's behavior problems and depression.

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Charles Greenbaum;Dante Cicchetti

  • Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims.

    Yael Orbach;Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E Lamb;Kathleen J Sternberg

  • Type of violence, age, and gender differences in the effects of family violence on children’s behavior problems: A mega-analysis

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Laila P. Baradaran;Craig B. Abbott;Michael E. Lamb

  • Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews.

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Yael Orbach;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews.

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Yael Orbach;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Effects of Investigative Utterance Types on Israeli Children's Responses:

    Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Liora Yudilevitch

  • THE EFFECTS OF DIVORCE AND CUSTODY ARRANGEMENTS ON CHILDREN'S BEHAVIOR, DEVELOPMENT, AND ADJUSTMENT

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Ross A. Thompson

  • The Memorandum of Good Practice: theory versus application.

    Kathleen J Sternberg;Michael E Lamb;Graham M Davies;Helen L Westcott

  • Effects of early and later family violence on children's behavior problems and depression: a longitudinal, multi-informant perspective.

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Eva Guterman;Craig B. Abbott

  • Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden.

    Ann-Christin Cederborg;Yael Orbach;Kathleen J Sternberg;Michael E Lamb

  • Dynamics of Forensic Interviews with Suspected Abuse Victims Who Do Not Disclose Abuse.

    Irit Hershkowitz;Yael Orbach;Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg

  • The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Phillip W. Esplin

  • The Effects of Intensive Training and Ongoing Supervision on the Quality of Investigative Interviews With Alleged Sex Abuse Victims

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Yael Orbach;Irit Hershkowitz

  • Criterion-Based Content Analysis: A Field Validation Study.

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin;Irit Hershkowitz

  • Is Ongoing Feedback Necessary to Maintain The Quality of Investigative Interviews With Allegedly Abused Children

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Yael Orbach;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin

  • The effects of rapport-building style on children's reports of a staged event†

    Kim P. Roberts;Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg

  • Child care in context : cross-cultural perspectives

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Carl-Philip Hwang;Anders G. Broberg

  • Accuracy of investigators' verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims.

    Michael E. Lamb;Yael Orbach;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Irit Hershkowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Lamb
Michael E. Lamb University of Cambridge
Yael Orbach
Yael Orbach National Institutes of Health
Irit Hershkowitz
Irit Hershkowitz University of Haifa
Anders G. Broberg
Anders G. Broberg University of Gothenburg
Ross A. Thompson
Ross A. Thompson University of California, Davis
Margaret-Ellen Pipe
Margaret-Ellen Pipe City University of New York
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Graham Davies
Graham Davies University of Leicester
Allison D. Redlich
Allison D. Redlich George Mason University
John F. Knutson
John F. Knutson University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens a range of online degree options and career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling. Many accredited universities now offer online psychology and counseling degrees, helping students fast-track their education alongside work or other commitments.

State requirements can vary, with some places offering unique routes for aspiring counselors. For example, the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Maryland may differ from the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Massachusetts. In Michigan, you can explore Michigan fastest counseling programs to start your career sooner. Meanwhile, those in Minnesota can consider the fastest way to become a counselor in Minnesota.

When selecting your program, review state licensing requirements, online vs. on-campus options, and opportunities for supervised fieldwork. By understanding your state’s regulations and utilizing flexible online degrees, you can efficiently pursue a rewarding career in counseling or related psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen J. Sternberg

Recently Published Articles