World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Irit Hershkowitz

Irit Hershkowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7805 7282 74 67 93 8659

Irit Hershkowitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Irit Hershkowitz between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Irit Hershkowitz published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2009. 6 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2009. 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1996 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Irit Hershkowitz: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 6
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 8
2008 2
2009 16
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 4
2014 4
2015 3
2016 0
2017 4
2018 5
2019 6
2020 2
2021 5
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 4
Total 102
Download as CSV

Irit Hershkowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irit Hershkowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Irit Hershkowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Irit Hershkowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Irit Hershkowitz is affiliated with the University of Haifa in Israel and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on clinical and social psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Their research prominently addresses child abuse and trauma, deception detection and forensic psychology, and memory processes and influences.

Hershkowitz's work is frequently published in several academic venues, including:

  • Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • Development and Psychopathology
  • Psychology Crime and Law
  • Child Maltreatment
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities

Notable recent publications by Hershkowitz include:

  • "Allegation rates and credibility assessment in forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols." (2020) published in Psychology Public Policy and Law
  • "The dynamics of two-session interviews with suspected victims of abuse who are reluctant to make allegations" (2021) published in Development and Psychopathology

These publications investigate forensic interviewing protocols and interview dynamics involving suspected child abuse victims, highlighting both methodological and psychological aspects of these sensitive interactions.

Frequent collaborators include Michael E. Lamb, Yael Karni-Visel, Uri Blasbalg, Henry Otgaar, and Julia Korkman. Collaborative work often intersects with themes of forensic psychology and child maltreatment.

The main topics addressed in Hershkowitz's body of work are:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Child Abuse and Related Trauma

In addition to empirical studies, Hershkowitz contributes to broader discussions related to forensic child interviewing protocols and research-based recommendations, as seen in collaborative works published in journals like Psychology Crime and Law.

Best Publications

  • A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: a review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol

    Michael E. Lamb;Yael Orbach;Irit Hershkowitz;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims.

    Yael Orbach;Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E Lamb;Kathleen J Sternberg

  • Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged victims and their parents.

    Irit Hershkowitz;Omer Lanes;Michael E. Lamb

  • Effects of Investigative Utterance Types on Israeli Children's Responses:

    Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Liora Yudilevitch

  • Trends in children's disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study

    Irit Hershkowitz;Dvora Horowitz;Michael E. Lamb

  • Victimization of children with disabilities.

    Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E. Lamb;Dvora Horowitz

  • Dynamics of Forensic Interviews with Suspected Abuse Victims Who Do Not Disclose Abuse.

    Irit Hershkowitz;Yael Orbach;Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg

  • The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Phillip W. Esplin

  • The Effects of Intensive Training and Ongoing Supervision on the Quality of Investigative Interviews With Alleged Sex Abuse Victims

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Yael Orbach;Irit Hershkowitz

  • Criterion-Based Content Analysis: A Field Validation Study.

    Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin;Irit Hershkowitz

  • The Development of Communicative and Narrative Skills Among Preschoolers: Lessons From Forensic Interviews About Child Abuse

    Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E. Lamb;Yael Orbach;Carmit Katz

  • Accuracy of investigators' verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims.

    Michael E. Lamb;Yael Orbach;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Irit Hershkowitz

  • Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the Revised and Standard NICHD Protocols

    Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E. Lamb;Carmit Katz

  • Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.

    Michael E. Lamb;Irit Hershkowitz;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Barbara Boat

  • The NICHD protocol: a review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers

    David J. La Rooy;Sonja P. Brubacher;Anu Aromäki-Stratos;Mireille Cyr

  • Improving credibility assessment in child sexual abuse allegations: the role of the NICHD investigative interview protocol.

    Irit Hershkowitz;Sara Fisher;Michael E. Lamb;Dvora Horowitz

  • Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse?

    Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E. Lamb;Carmit Katz;Lindsay C. Malloy

  • The relationships among interviewer utterance type, CBCA scores and the richness of children's responses

    Irit Hershkowitz;Michael E. Lamb;Kathleen J. Sternberg;Phillip W. Esplin

  • Using a Structured Interview Protocol to Improve the Quality of Investigative Interviews

    Kathleen J. Sternberg;Michael E. Lamb;Phillip W. Esplin;Yael Orbach

  • Tell Me What Happened: Questioning Children about Abuse

    Michael E. Lamb;Deirdre A. Brown;Irit Hershkowitz;Yael Orbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Lamb
Michael E. Lamb University of Cambridge
Kathleen J. Sternberg
Kathleen J. Sternberg National Institutes of Health
Yael Orbach
Yael Orbach National Institutes of Health
Corine de Ruiter
Corine de Ruiter Maastricht University
Allison D. Redlich
Allison D. Redlich George Mason University
Pär Anders Granhag
Pär Anders Granhag University of Gothenburg
Ronald P. Fisher
Ronald P. Fisher Florida International University
Margaret-Ellen Pipe
Margaret-Ellen Pipe City University of New York
Bruno Verschuere
Bruno Verschuere University of Amsterdam
Thomas D. Lyon
Thomas D. Lyon University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to various online programs and specialized career opportunities. Many students pursue certifications such as the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which are highly sought after across the nation.

Key steps in this pathway include completing relevant graduate degrees, such as a master’s in applied behavior analysis, meeting supervised experience requirements, and passing the national certification exam. Each state or city might have unique requirements and resources—learn the specifics of how to become a bcba in San Francisco, understand the San Jose bcba education requirements, review bcba certification requirements in Santa Ana, and get guidance on how to become a bcba in Scottsdale.

Online programs provide flexibility for learners balancing work and studies, making it easier to start or advance in a psychology-related career. Carefully review admission standards and certification pathways to select the best program for your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Irit Hershkowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles