World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
20971
World Ranking
1717
National Ranking
195

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
21312
World Ranking
1918
National Ranking
200

Jonathan P. Roiser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Roiser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 258 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathan P. Roiser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan P. Roiser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Jonathan P. Roiser is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Psychology, Neuroscience, and Medicine. Within these broader areas, their work includes subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Neurology, and Applied Psychology.

Their research extensively covers topics within mental health, including Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Other main topics include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Jonathan P. Roiser has contributed to several research papers published in various academic venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • Reward-Processing Behavior in Depressed Participants Relative to Healthy Volunteers, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Ketamine modulates fronto-striatal circuitry in depressed and healthy individuals, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Searching for an anchor in an unpredictable world: A computational model of obsessive compulsive disorder, 2020, Psychological Review
  • The impact of COVID-19 social isolation on aspects of emotional and social cognition, 2021, Cognition & Emotion
  • Realizing the Clinical Potential of Computational Psychiatry: Report From the Banbury Center Meeting, February 2019, 2020, Biological Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors in their research include Robert Howard, Yumeya Yamamori, Harry Costello, Peter Dayan, and Vincent Valton, reflecting ongoing collaborative work in their areas of study.

The scientist's work has appeared in a number of academic venues repeatedly, reflecting consistent contributions to particular journals and platforms. Most frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Brain Communications

Jonathan P. Roiser was awarded the Spearman Medal by the British Psychological Society in 2013, recognizing their contributions to the field.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    P. L. Rock;J. P. Roiser;W. J. Riedel;A. D. Blackwell

  • Reward and Punishment Processing in Depression

    Neir Eshel;Neir Eshel;Jonathan P. Roiser

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on psychological treatments research in tomorrow's science

    Emily A Holmes;Ata Ghaderi;Catherine J Harmer;Catherine J Harmer;Paul G Ramchandani

  • Cognitive Mechanisms of Treatment in Depression

    Jonathan P Roiser;Rebecca Elliott;Barbara J Sahakian

  • Dopamine, serotonin and impulsivity

    J.W. Dalley;J.P. Roiser

  • Neuroscience of apathy and anhedonia: a transdiagnostic approach

    Masud Husain;Jonathan P. Roiser

  • Bonsai Trees in Your Head: How the Pavlovian System Sculpts Goal-Directed Choices by Pruning Decision Trees

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Neir Eshel;Elizabeth J. P. O'Nions;Luke Sheridan

  • Hot and cold cognition in depression.

    Jonathan P. Roiser;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Striatal prediction error modulates cortical coupling

    H.E.M. den Ouden;J. Daunizeau;J. Roiser;K.J. Friston

  • Atomoxetine Modulates Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Inhibitory Control: A Pharmacological Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Adam Hampshire;Ulrich Müller;Katya Rubia

  • Do patients with schizophrenia exhibit aberrant salience

    J. P. Roiser;K. E. Stephan;H. E. M. den Ouden;T. R. E. Barnes

  • Computational Psychiatry: towards a mathematically informed understanding of mental illness

    Rick A Adams;Quentin J M Huys;Jonathan P Roiser

  • Interplay of approximate planning strategies

    Quentin J. M. Huys;Quentin J. M. Huys;Níall Lally;Níall Lally;Paul Faulkner;Neir Eshel

  • Developmental influences on the neural bases of responses to social rejection: implications of social neuroscience for education

    Catherine L. Sebastian;Geoffrey C.Y. Tan;Jonathan P. Roiser;Essi Viding

  • Chronic cocaine but not chronic amphetamine use is associated with perseverative responding in humans

    Karen D. Ersche;Jonathan P. Roiser;Trevor W. Robbins;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Anti-anhedonic effect of ketamine and its neural correlates in treatment-resistant bipolar depression.

    N Lally;A C Nugent;D A Luckenbaugh;R Ameli

  • Understanding why patients with schizophrenia do not perceive the hollow-mask illusion using dynamic causal modelling

    Danai Dima;Jonathan P. Roiser;Detlef E. Dietrich;Catharina Bonnemann

  • Stratified medicine for mental disorders

    Gunter Schumann;Elisabeth B. Binder;Arne Holte;E. Ronald de Kloet

  • A Genetically Mediated Bias in Decision Making Driven by Failure of Amygdala Control

    J. P. Roiser;B. de Martino;G. C. Tan;D. Kumaran

  • Serotonin Selectively Modulates Reward Value in Human Decision-Making

    Ben Seymour;Nathaniel D. Daw;Nathaniel D. Daw;Jonathan P. Roiser;Peter Dayan

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
Oliver J. Robinson
Oliver J. Robinson University College London
Peter Dayan
Peter Dayan Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Quentin J. M. Huys
Quentin J. M. Huys University College London
Karl J. Friston
Karl J. Friston University College London
Klaas E. Stephan
Klaas E. Stephan University of Zurich
Wayne C. Drevets
Wayne C. Drevets Johnson & Johnson (United States)
Essi Viding
Essi Viding University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open doors to a range of related online programs and career pathways, such as social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students seek flexible, affordable options to support their academic and professional goals.

If you’re looking for accessible education, there are several affordable social work degree programs in the U.S. For example, you can review the most affordable social work degree programs in Virginia or explore the cheapest social work programs in Washington, D.C. These programs often provide both online and on-campus learning options.

In the western states, students can consider the most affordable social work degree programs in the West, ensuring a broader range of choices for different budgets and career goals.

For those looking into career outcomes or popular program choices, you may find it helpful to check out the most popular social work degree programs in Arizona. This can provide insights into fast-growing areas of study and employment opportunities in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan P. Roiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles