World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7902
World Ranking
7844
National Ranking
4217

Philip J. Kellman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Kellman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Philip J. Kellman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip J. Kellman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip J. Kellman is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles, in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on medicine and neuroscience. Within these broad areas, Kellman has contributed substantially to cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, family practice, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work includes a notable emphasis on visual perception and processing mechanisms, with additional focus on face recognition and perception. Kellman's research also covers clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills, visual attention and saliency detection, aesthetic perception and analysis, visual and cognitive learning processes, and radiology practices and education.

Kellman has published extensively, with frequent publications in several academic journals. The most common venues include the Journal of Vision, where 13 of their publications appear, as well as the Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Vision Research, AEM Education and Training, and the Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery.

The most recent papers authored by Kellman reflect interdisciplinary approaches and advances in perception and learning. These publications include:

  • Local features and global shape information in object classification by deep convolutional neural networks, 2020, Vision Research
  • Mastering Electrocardiogram Interpretation Skills Through a Perceptual and Adaptive Learning Module, 2020, AEM Education and Training
  • Novel Education Modules Addressing the Underrepresentation of Skin of Color in Dermatology Training, 2021, Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
  • Constant curvature segments as building blocks of 2D shape representation, 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Configural relations in humans and deep convolutional neural networks, 2023, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

Kellman frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include Nicholas Baker, Sally Krasne, Christine Massey, Hongjing Lu, and Patrick Garrigan.

Best Publications

  • Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy

    Philip J. Kellman;Elizabeth S. Spelke

  • A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.

    Philip J Kellman;Thomas F Shipley

  • Deep convolutional networks do not classify based on global object shape.

    Nicholas Baker;Hongjing Lu;Gennady Erlikhman;Philip J. Kellman

  • The Cradle of Knowledge: Development of Perception in Infancy

    Philip J. Kellman;Martha E. Arterberry

  • Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length.

    Thomas F. Shipley;Philip J. Kellman

  • Perceptual learning and human expertise

    Philip J. Kellman;Patrick Garrigan

  • Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics: Enhancing Students’ Pattern Recognition, Structure Extraction, and Fluency

    Philip J. Kellman;Christine M. Massey;Ji Yun Son

  • Infant perception of object unity from translatory motion in depth and vertical translation.

    Philip J. Kellman;Elizabeth S. Spelke;Kenneth R. Short

  • Infant Visual Perception

    Philip J. Kellman;Martha E. Arterberry

  • Perceptual Learning, Cognition, and Expertise

    Philip J. Kellman;Christine M. Massey

  • Perception of Partly Occluded Objects and Illusory Figures: Evidence for an Identity Hypothesis

    Thomas F. Shipley;Philip J. Kellman

  • Perception of three-dimensional form by human infants

    Philip J. Kellman

  • A common mechanism for illusory and occluded object completion.

    Philip J. Kellman;Carol Yin;Thomas F. Shipley

  • From fragments to objects : segmentation and grouping in vision

    Thomas F. Shipley;Philip J. Kellman

  • Development of three-dimensional form perception.

    Philip J. Kellman;Kenneth R. Short

  • System and method for adaptive perceptual learning

    Philip J. Kellman

  • Object and observer motion in the perception of objects by infants.

    Philip J. Kellman;Henry Gleitman;Elizabeth S. Spelke

  • Concurrent motion in infant event perception

    Philip J. Kellman;Claes von Hofsten;Joaquim Soares

  • Surface completion complements boundary interpolation in the visual integration of partly occluded objects.

    Carol Yin;Philip J Kellman;Thomas F Shipley

  • Spatiotemporal boundary formation: boundary, form, and motion perception from transformations of surface elements

    Thomas F. Shipley;Philip J. Kellman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Shipley
Thomas F. Shipley Temple University
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University
Todd S. Horowitz
Todd S. Horowitz National Institutes of Health
Steven M. Silverstein
Steven M. Silverstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Itiel E. Dror
Itiel E. Dror University College London
Allison B. Sekuler
Allison B. Sekuler McMaster University
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Alan Slater
Alan Slater University of Exeter
Scott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
Charles W. Kalish
Charles W. Kalish University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and professional options, particularly in fields like applied behavior analysis. One popular path is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specific educational and certification steps that vary by state.

For those interested in becoming a bcba in Washington, state-specific coursework and supervised experience are key requirements. Similarly, West Virginia bcba education requirements place emphasis on accredited graduate programs and state licensure. In the Midwest, bcba certification requirements in Wisconsin include completing a master’s degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam. Meanwhile, students considering Wyoming bcba requirements will also need to meet state guidelines for education and practical experience.

Online psychology degrees can serve as valuable starting points for these careers, giving you the flexibility to meet state-specific BCBA criteria while balancing other commitments. Be sure to review the requirements for your intended state and select accredited programs that support your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Philip J. Kellman

Trending Scientists