World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
13184
World Ranking
5142
National Ranking
2831

Todd S. Horowitz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd S. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Todd S. Horowitz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd S. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd S. Horowitz is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging.

The scientist has contributed to topics including neural and behavioral psychology studies, medical image segmentation techniques, cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, traumatic brain injury research, neurological disorders and treatments, and spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction.

Todd S. Horowitz has published several research papers in various scientific venues. Notable recent publications include:

  • The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self, 2020, Trends in Neurosciences
  • How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests, 2021, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Efficacy of intermittent exposure to bright light for treating maladaptation to night work on a counterclockwise shift work rotation, 2021, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • MILO Mobile: An iPad App to Measure Search Performance in Multi-Target Sequences, 2020, i-Perception
  • Searching Through Alternating Sequences: Working Memory and Inhibitory Tagging Mechanisms Revealed Using the MILO Task, 2020, i-Perception

The frequent coauthors of Todd S. Horowitz include:

  • Melissa Treviño
  • Xiaoshu Zhu
  • Yi Yi Lu
  • Grace C. Huang
  • Laura Germine

Key publication venues where Todd S. Horowitz has appeared include:

  • i-Perception
  • Journal of Vision
  • Trends in Neurosciences
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health

Best Publications

  • What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Todd S. Horowitz

  • Five factors that guide attention in visual search

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Todd S. Horowitz

  • Visual search has no memory

    Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • Cognitive psychology: Rare items often missed in visual searches

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz;Naomi M. Kenner

  • The Emerging Science of Interoception: Sensing, Integrating, Interpreting, and Regulating Signals within the Self.

    Wen G. Chen;Dana Schloesser;Angela M. Arensdorf;Janine M. Simmons

  • Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Todd S. Horowitz;Michael J. Van Wert;Naomi M. Kenner

  • Why Is Visual Search Superior in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Robert M. Joseph;Brandon Keehn;Christine Connolly;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Jeremy M. Wolfe;Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz;Naomi Kenner;Megan Hyle

  • Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory

    Michael Cohen;Todd Horowitz;Jeremy Wolfe

  • Auditory recognition memory is inferior to visual recognition memory

    Michael A. Cohen;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention

    Melina A. Kunar;Stephen Flusberg;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search

    Evan M. Palmer;Todd S. Horowitz;Antonio Torralba;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks.

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Aude Oliva;Aude Oliva;Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz;Serena J. Butcher

  • Tracking unique objects

    Todd S. Horowitz;Sarah B. Klieger;David E. Fencsik;Kevin K. Yang

  • Attention is fast but volition is slow.

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;George A. Alvarez;Todd S. Horowitz

  • Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Evan M. Palmer;Todd S. Horowitz

  • Efficacy of bright light and sleep/darkness scheduling in alleviating circadian maladaptation to night work.

    Todd S. Horowitz;Brian E. Cade;Jeremy M. Wolfe;Jeremy M. Wolfe;Charles A. Czeisler

  • Prevalence effects in newly trained airport checkpoint screeners: Trained observers miss rare targets, too

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Jeremy M. Wolfe;David N. Brunelli;Joshua Rubinstein;Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz

  • Acute sleep deprivation and circadian misalignment associated with transition onto the first night of work impairs visual selective attention.

    Nayantara Santhi;Nayantara Santhi;Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeanne Frances Duffy;Jeanne Frances Duffy;Charles Andrew Czeisler;Charles Andrew Czeisler

  • Auditory and visual memory in musicians and nonmusicians

    Michael A. Cohen;Karla K. Evans;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search

    Todd S. Horowitz;Todd S. Horowitz;Jeremy M. Wolfe

  • Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect

    Anina N Rich;Anina N Rich;Anina N Rich;Melina A Kunar;Michael J Van Wert;Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy M. Wolfe
Jeremy M. Wolfe Brigham and Women's Hospital
Charles A. Czeisler
Charles A. Czeisler Brigham and Women's Hospital
Edward K. Vogel
Edward K. Vogel University of Chicago
Anina N. Rich
Anina N. Rich Macquarie University
Jeanne F. Duffy
Jeanne F. Duffy Brigham and Women's Hospital
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health
Philip J. Kellman
Philip J. Kellman University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology is a diverse and growing field, and online degrees offer flexibility and access to top programs across the USA. Students can choose from various accredited programs tailored to their career goals, whether they want to focus on counseling, research, or human services.

When considering an online degree, factors such as program accreditation, faculty expertise, and available specializations are important. For those seeking guidance, resources like the online psychology master's programs in Florida and the online psychology master's degrees in Kansas highlight top-ranked schools and their unique offerings.

Location-specific rankings provide insights into regional differences and strengths. For example, you can explore the best online psychology master's degree rankings in New York and the best online psychology program rankings in Pennsylvania to compare options and curriculum.

Graduates with an online psychology degree can pursue careers in mental health, education, business, or continue their studies at the doctoral level. Online programs make it possible to balance life commitments while advancing your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Todd S. Horowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles