World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10675 9995 515 507 147 3323

Anna Schubö publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna Schubö between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna Schubö published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2024. 27 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2024. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna Schubö: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 0
2006 1
2007 7
2008 6
2009 12
2010 17
2011 12
2012 6
2013 8
2014 3
2015 7
2016 6
2017 16
2018 4
2019 4
2020 7
2021 14
2022 10
2023 11
2024 18
2025 9
Total 185
Download as CSV

Anna Schubö publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Schubö sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna Schubö D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Schubö sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna Schubö is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany and conducts research primarily in the field of Neuroscience. Their work spans various subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, and Sensory Systems.

Their publications often focus on topics such as Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, Visual Attention and Saliency Detection, Neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Action Observation and Synchronization, and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies.

Frequent publication venues for Anna Schubö include the Journal of Vision, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Scientific Reports, Attention Perception & Psychophysics, and the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Collaborations have been a consistent aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Jan Tünnermann, Dion Henare, Ilja Wagner, Alexander C. Schütz, and Nils Bergmann.

The following recent papers reflect their research interests and contributions:

  • A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model (2021, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • The Distractor Positivity Component and the Inhibition of Distracting Stimuli (2023, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience)
  • Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction (2024, Attention Perception & Psychophysics)
  • Impaired disengagement of attention from computer-related stimuli in Internet Gaming Disorder: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence (2021, Journal of Behavioral Addictions)
  • How feature context alters attentional template switching (2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance)

Best Publications

  • Expectancies as core features of mental disorders.

    Winfried Rief;Julia A. Glombiewski;Mario Gollwitzer;Anna Schubö

  • Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces

    Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld;Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld;Martin Schmidt-Daffy;Anna Schubö

  • How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö;Bernhard Hommel

  • Human cognition in manual assembly: Theories and applications

    Sonja Stork;Anna Schubö

  • You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention

    Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld;Metin Uengoer;Anna Schubö

  • Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: are faces special?

    Anna Schubö;Guido H E Gendolla;Cristina Meinecke;Andrea E Abele

  • Cognitive processes facilitated by contextual cueing: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

    Andrea Schankin;Anna Schubö

  • Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain potentials

    Anna Schubö;Cristina Meinecke;Erich Schröger

  • Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives.

    Martin Eimer;Anna Schubö;Friedericke Schlaghecken

  • Texture segmentation and visual search for pop-out targets. An ERP study.

    Anna Schubö;Erich Schröger;Cristina Meinecke

  • Interactions between perception and action in a reaction task with overlapping S-R assignments.

    Anna Schubö;Gisa Aschersleben;Wolfgang Prinz

  • Deficits in early emotional reactivity in alexithymia.

    Olga Pollatos;Anna Schubö;Beate M. Herbert;Ellen Matthias

  • A Revised Framework for the Investigation of Expectation Update Versus Maintenance in the Context of Expectation Violations: The ViolEx 2.0 Model.

    Christian Panitz;Christian Panitz;Christian Panitz;Dominik Endres;Merle Buchholz;Zahra Khosrowtaj

  • Learning to ignore the mask in texture segmentation tasks.

    Anna Schubö;Friederike Schlaghecken;Cristina Meinecke

  • On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö

  • Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.

    Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld;Anna Schubö

  • Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Anna Schubö

  • Perceiving while acting: action affects perception.

    Anna Schubö;Wolfgang Prinz;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Detecting pop-out targets in contexts of varying homogeneity : Investigating homogeneity coding with event-related brain potentials (ERPs)

    Anna Schubö;Agnieszka Wykowska;Hermann J. Müller

  • Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations.

    Andrea Schankin;Anna Schubö

Frequent Co-Authors

Agnieszka Wykowska
Agnieszka Wykowska Italian Institute of Technology
Bernhard Hommel
Bernhard Hommel Shandong Normal University
Hermann J. Müller
Hermann J. Müller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Sandra Hirche
Sandra Hirche Technical University of Munich
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Michael Beetz
Michael Beetz University of Bremen
Niko A. Busch
Niko A. Busch University of Münster
Thilo Womelsdorf
Thilo Womelsdorf Vanderbilt University
Michael F. Zaeh
Michael F. Zaeh Technical University of Munich
Martin Buss
Martin Buss Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees, such as counseling, can open doors to impactful career pathways. Online master’s programs in counseling are increasingly popular for those looking to balance education with work or family commitments.

Affordability is a major concern for many students. Choosing the right program means comparing both tuition and quality. For instance, there are affordable online counseling master's programs in Florida which provide solid educational foundations for aspiring counselors. Similarly, you can find some of the cheapest online counseling master's programs in Fort Lauderdale for those aiming to study in that region.

If you’re considering studying outside Florida, options like the cheapest online counseling master's programs in Georgia can be worth exploring. Or you might look to the West Coast, where the most affordable online master's in counseling degree programs in Los Angeles offer flexible learning from a vibrant metropolitan area.

By researching these affordable options, you can start your journey toward a meaningful career in counseling or psychology without undue financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Schubö

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles