World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roberto Dell'Acqua

Roberto Dell'Acqua

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9543 8924 208 204 94 5213

Roberto Dell'Acqua publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberto Dell'Acqua between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberto Dell'Acqua published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2011. 11 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2011. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 8 publications
1996 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberto Dell'Acqua: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 4
2001 7
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 3
2006 6
2007 6
2008 3
2009 5
2010 8
2011 9
2012 8
2013 4
2014 5
2015 4
2016 2
2017 2
2018 3
2019 5
2020 6
2021 1
2022 2
2023 0
2024 3
2025 8
Total 114
Download as CSV

Roberto Dell'Acqua publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Dell'Acqua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roberto Dell'Acqua D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Dell'Acqua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roberto Dell'Acqua is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of Neuroscience. Their research primarily spans cognitive neuroscience, emphasizing neural and behavioral psychology studies, neural dynamics and brain function, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces. Additional focus areas include visual perception and processing mechanisms, respiratory viral infections research, viral infections and vectors, as well as advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications.

Recent research papers authored or co-authored by Roberto Dell'Acqua include:

  • Multishell Diffusion MRI-Based Tractography of the Facial Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma, 2020, American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Distilling the distinct contralateral and ipsilateral attentional responses to lateral stimuli and the bilateral response to midline stimuli for upper and lower visual hemifield locations, 2020, Psychophysiology
  • A bilateral SPCN is elicited by to-be-memorized visual stimuli displayed along the vertical midline, 2022, Psychophysiology
  • Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) on adult haematology oncology patients, 2024, Journal of Infection
  • Computer data simulator to assess the accuracy of estimates of visual N2/N2pc event-related potential components, 2020, Journal of Neural Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dell'Acqua include:

  • Sabrina Brigadoi
  • Paola Sessa
  • Mattia Doro
  • Valentina Baro
  • Pierre Jolicœur

Publishing venues where Roberto Dell'Acqua's work frequently appears include:

  • Psychophysiology
  • Cortex
  • Journal of Neural Engineering
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Infection

The main fields of study related to Dell'Acqua's research are:

  • Neuroscience

Subfields of particular focus are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Social Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Topics covered in Dell'Acqua's publications encompass:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Respiratory viral infections research
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Best Publications

  • The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation.

    Pierre Jolicoeur;Roberto Dell'Acqua

  • Unconscious semantic priming from pictures

    Roberto Dell'Acqua;Jonathan Grainger

  • Visual short-term memory capacity for simple and complex objects

    Roy Luria;Paola Sessa;Alex Gotler;Pierre Jolicœur

  • Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases.

    Roberto Dell’acqua;Lorella Lotto;Remo Job

  • Task switching and multitask performance.

    Harold Pashler;Pierre Jolicœur;Roberto Dell'Acqua;Jacquelyn Crebolder

  • Spatial attention freezes during the attention blink.

    R. Dell'Acqua;P. Sessa;P. Jolicœur;N. Robitaille

  • On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology

    Pierre Jolicœur;Paola Sessa;Roberto Dell’Acqua;Nicolas Robitaille

  • ERP Evidence for Ultra-Fast Semantic Processing in the Picture-Word Interference Paradigm.

    Roberto Dell'Acqua;Paola Sessa;Francesca Peressotti;Claudio Mulatti

  • Taking one’s time in feeling other-race pain: an event-related potential investigation on the time-course of cross-racial empathy

    Paola Sessa;Federica Meconi;Luigi Castelli;Roberto Dell’Acqua

  • Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding

    Pierre Jolicœur;Roberto Dell'Acqua

  • Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: New evidence from the N2pc component

    Monika Kiss;Pierre Jolicœur;Roberto Dell'Acqua;Martin Eimer

  • Attentional control and capture in the attentional blink paradigm: Evidence from human electrophysiology

    Pierre Jolicœur;Paola Sessa;Roberto Dell'Acqua;Nicolas Robitaille

  • Selective activation of the superior frontal gyrus in task-switching: an event-related fNIRS study.

    Simone Cutini;Pietro Scatturin;Enrica Menon;Patrizia Silvia Bisiacchi

  • The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect.

    R. Dell’Acqua;R. Job;F. Peressotti;A. Pascali

  • Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory

    Roberto Dell'Acqua;Paola Sessa;Paolo Toffanin;Roy Luria

  • Number–Space Interactions in the Human Parietal Cortex: Enlightening the SNARC Effect with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

    Simone Cutini;Fabio Scarpa;Pietro Scatturin;Roberto Dell'Acqua

  • Interhemispheric ERP asymmetries over inferior parietal cortex reveal differential visual working memory maintenance for fearful versus neutral facial identities

    Paola Sessa;Roy Luria;Alex Gotler;Pierre Jolicœur

  • Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference

    Roberto Dell’acqua;Pierre Joucoeur

  • Electrophysiological evidence of visual encoding deficits in a cross-modal attentional blink paradigm.

    R. Dell'acqua;P. Jolicoeur;F. Pesciarelli;R. Job

  • Bidirectional semantic priming in the attentional blink

    Mary C. Potter;Roberto Dell’acqua;Francesca Pesciarelli;Remo Job

Frequent Co-Authors

Remo Job
Remo Job University of Trento
Pierre Jolicoeur
Pierre Jolicoeur University of Montreal
Giovanni Sparacino
Giovanni Sparacino University of Padua
Marco Zorzi
Marco Zorzi University of Padua
Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Paul E. Dux
Paul E. Dux University of Queensland
Harold Pashler
Harold Pashler University of California, San Diego
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University
John J. McDonald
John J. McDonald Simon Fraser University
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse career pathways, from counseling and clinical roles to research and education. Many students choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance education with personal and professional commitments.

As you consider your options, it’s important to understand state-specific licensing requirements. For example, Colorado Springs licensed therapist requirements stress the importance of obtaining a graduate degree and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, reviewing the Columbus licensed therapist education requirements shows how academic coursework and practicum experiences are crucial to your career.

If you’re looking at Texas, it’s essential to learn about becoming a licensed therapist in Corpus Christi, which involves meeting academic, ethical, and examination standards. Additionally, understanding licensed therapist requirements in Dallas can help guide your choices for specialization and state licensure processes.

With the right degree and an understanding of licensing requirements, you can pursue meaningful roles in mental health and related fields throughout the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Dell'Acqua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles