World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
27976
World Ranking
1004
National Ranking
124

Neuroscience

D-Index
89
Citations
27969
World Ranking
1151
National Ranking
128

Martin Eimer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Eimer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 333 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Eimer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Eimer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Overview

Martin Eimer is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily focused on neuroscience, with specific expertise in cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also spans subfields such as computer vision and pattern recognition, social psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The main research topics covered by Martin Eimer include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Martin Eimer's recent papers demonstrate the breadth of their interests and contributions across cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Notable publications include:

  • "Action biases perceptual decisions toward expected outcomes," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "PD components and distractor inhibition in visual search: New evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis," 2021, Psychophysiology
  • "Sensory experience modulates the reorganization of auditory regions for executive processing," 2022, Brain
  • "Preparatory Template Activation during Search for Alternating Targets," 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search," 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics

The scientist has published extensively in several key academic venues, contributing to forums known for their emphasis on vision science and cognitive studies, including:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Psychophysiology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Martin Eimer frequently collaborates with other researchers. Common coauthors include:

  • Alon Zivony
  • Anna Grubert
  • Rebecca Nako
  • Brandi Lee Drisdelle
  • Ziyi Wang

Their contributions have been recognized through awards such as membership in the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2012, where they were noted for their work in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences.

Best Publications

  • The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.

    Martin Eimer

  • On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements

    Patrick Haggard;Martin Eimer

  • An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes

  • Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes

  • Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition

    Martin Eimer

  • The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces.

    Martin Eimer

  • Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

    Martin Eimer;Friederike Schlaghecken

  • The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

    Amanda Holmes;Patrik Vuilleumier;Martin Eimer

  • The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: an ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes;Francis P. McGlone

  • Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task

    Martin Eimer

  • Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

    Martin Eimer

  • Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials

    Martin Eimer;Monika Kiss

  • Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming

    Martin Eimer;Friederike Schlaghecken

  • The N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processing

    Monika Kiss;Jose L. Van Velzen;Martin Eimer

  • The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes

    Martin Eimer

  • Cross-Modal Interactions between Audition, Touch, and Vision in Endogenous Spatial Attention: ERP Evidence on Preparatory States and Sensory Modulations

    Martin Eimer;José Van Velzen;Jon Driver

  • The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential

    Martin Eimer

  • The neural basis of attentional control in visual search

    Martin Eimer

  • Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor?

    Martin Eimer

  • Reward Priority of Visual Target Singletons Modulates Event-Related Potential Signatures of Attentional Selection

    Monika Kiss;Jon Driver;Martin Eimer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Ansorge
Ulrich Ansorge University of Vienna
Tim J. Smith
Tim J. Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Amanda Holmes
Amanda Holmes University of Roehampton
Erich Schröger
Erich Schröger Leipzig University
Clare Press
Clare Press Birkbeck, University of London
Jane E. Raymond
Jane E. Raymond University of Birmingham
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Howard Bowman
Howard Bowman University of Birmingham
Gaia Scerif
Gaia Scerif University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in psychology, there are several related online programs and career pathways to explore—especially in the field of counseling. Many choose to pursue the Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) credential, which opens doors to a variety of counseling careers. However, it is important to note that Kansas lpc licensure requirements differ from those in other states.

For example, students looking into the Kentucky lpc licensure requirements must complete specific graduate coursework and obtain supervised experience. In Louisiana, candidates should review the lpc licensure requirements in Louisiana to understand unique educational and examination requirements. Similarly, the Maine lpc licensure requirements specify their own process for supervision and testing.

Each state sets its own standards, so it’s vital to research licensure requirements where you plan to practice. Earning an online psychology or counseling degree can be the first step toward a fulfilling career in mental health, therapy, or counseling—just be sure your program meets the requirements in your intended state of practice.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Eimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles