World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10756 10070 1045 998 56 7023

Amanda Holmes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Holmes between 2001 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Holmes published across 23 years, from 2001 to 2023, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 5 publications in 2005. 5 of the 60 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
1 2 3 4 5
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 5. Peak 5 publications in 2005. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications
2001 2023

60 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Holmes: publications per year, 2001 to 2023
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 5
2006 2
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 5
2011 2
2012 5
2013 2
2014 5
2015 5
2016 2
2017 4
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 3
2023 2
Total 60
Download as CSV

Amanda Holmes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Holmes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138 56
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Holmes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Holmes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Holmes is affiliated with the University of Roehampton in the United Kingdom and has contributed to a range of research topics primarily within psychology and neuroscience. Their work explores various aspects of cognitive and clinical psychology, social psychology, as well as behavioral and cognitive neuroscience. Holmes's research also intersects with animal behavior and welfare studies and neuroscience applications in both human and animal models.

Their recent publications cover diverse topics, including primate behavior, neurostimulation effects on perceptual experiences, and food composition:

  • Developing and validating attention bias tools for assessing trait and state affect in animals: A worked example with Macaca mulatta, 2020, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex influences perceived pleasantness of food, 2023, Heliyon
  • Development and scale-up of gluten-free sorghum-based bakery goods for K-state Dining Services, 2023, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
  • Responses to '"Anal" and "Sexual"', 2022, Psychoanalysis and History

Frequent co-authors in Holmes's work include Emmeline Howarth, Caralyn Kemp, Harriet R. Thatcher, Isabelle D. Szott, and David Farningham, indicating collaborative research across multiple studies.

Holmes typically publishes in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Heliyon, Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, and Psychoanalysis and History, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach engaging fields related to both animal and human behavioral sciences.

The main fields of study Holmes contributes to are Psychology and Neuroscience, with subfields focusing on:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Small Animals
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

The primary research topics explored include:

  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Food composition and properties

Holmes's work integrates behavioral and neural studies, incorporating experimental approaches and applied research. The research on transcranial direct current stimulation reflects interest in how brain modulation techniques influence perception and behavior. Similarly, the study on gluten-free sorghum-based bakery goods indicates engagement with food science and its applications in nutrition services.

Overall, Amanda Holmes has maintained a multidisciplinary research portfolio with a focus on psychological processes in both humans and animals, contributing knowledge across academic and practical domains within the neuroscience and psychology fields.

Best Publications

  • An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes

  • Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes

  • The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

    Amanda Holmes;Patrik Vuilleumier;Martin Eimer

  • The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: an ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions.

    Martin Eimer;Amanda Holmes;Francis P. McGlone

  • Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals

    Karin Mogg;Amanda Holmes;Matthew Garner;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Effects of anxiety on the processing of fearful and happy faces: an event-related potential study.

    Amanda Holmes;Maria Kragh Nielsen;Simon Green

  • Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: evidence from human electrophysiology.

    Amanda Holmes;Brendan P. Bradley;Maria Kragh Nielsen;Karin Mogg

  • The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression.

    Amanda Holmes;Joel S. Winston;Martin Eimer

  • Evidence That Emotion Mediates Social Attention in Rhesus Macaques

    Emily J. Bethell;Amanda Holmes;Ann MacLarnon;Stuart Semple

  • Anxiety and sensitivity to eye gaze in emotional faces

    Amanda Holmes;Angela Richards;Samuel Green

  • Attention modulates the processing of emotional expression triggered by foveal faces.

    Amanda Holmes;Monika Kiss;Martin Eimer

  • The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions

    Amanda Holmes;Simon Green;Patrik Vuilleumier

  • Cognitive bias in a non-human primate: husbandry procedures influence cognitive indicators of psychological well-being in captive rhesus macaques

    E. J. Bethell;Amanda Holmes;Ann MacLarnon;Stuart Semple

  • Electrophysiological markers of categorical perception of color in 7-month old infants.

    Alexandra Clifford;Anna Franklin;Ian R.L. Davies;Amanda Holmes

  • Color categories affect pre-attentive color perception

    Alexandra Clifford;Amanda Holmes;Ian R.L. Davies;Anna Franklin

  • Neurophysiological evidence for categorical perception of color

    Amanda Holmes;Anna Franklin;Alexandra Clifford;Ian Davies

  • Emotion Evaluation and Response Slowing in a Non-Human Primate: New Directions for Cognitive Bias Measures of Animal Emotion?

    Emily J Bethell;Amanda Holmes;Ann MacLarnon;Stuart Semple

  • Inclined to see it your way: Do altercentric intrusion effects in visual perspective taking reflect an intrinsically social process?:

    Maria Kragh Nielsen;Lance Slade;Joseph P. Levy;Amanda Holmes

  • An Electrophysiological Investigation into the Automaticity of Emotional Face Processing in High versus Low Trait Anxious Individuals

    Amanda Holmes;Maria Kragh Nielsen;Stephanie Tipper;Simon Green

  • Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted

    Amanda Holmes;Karin Mogg;Jan de Fockert;Maria Kragh Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Eimer
Martin Eimer Birkbeck, University of London
Anna Franklin
Anna Franklin University of Sussex
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University
Holly A. Taylor
Holly A. Taylor Tufts University
Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Karin Mogg
Karin Mogg University of Southampton
Anne Richards
Anne Richards Birkbeck, University of London
Caroline R. Mahoney
Caroline R. Mahoney Tufts University
Patrik Vuilleumier
Patrik Vuilleumier University of Geneva
Michael W. Eysenck
Michael W. Eysenck Royal Holloway University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees offer a flexible and accessible route for students aiming to enter the field. Affordability is a key factor when choosing a program, and many options now make it easier to pursue your goals without incurring excessive debt.

For example, students in the Midwest can explore the most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in Minnesota. In the Northeast, the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in New York provide excellent value and strong academic support.

For those based in southern states, there are several affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in the South. Alternatively, students in the Midwest may benefit from the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in St. Louis.

Graduates of online psychology programs can pursue a variety of rewarding careers, including counseling, social services, mental health support, and even advanced studies for specialized roles. Balancing affordability and quality education is key to opening new career pathways in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Holmes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles