World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline R. Mahoney

Caroline R. Mahoney

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9897 9264 5223 4771 87 4892

Caroline R. Mahoney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caroline R. Mahoney between 2005 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caroline R. Mahoney published across 20 years, from 2005 to 2024, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2012. 1 of the 90 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2012. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2005 2024

90 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caroline R. Mahoney: publications per year, 2005 to 2024
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 0
2007 5
2008 2
2009 6
2010 7
2011 7
2012 12
2013 9
2014 8
2015 9
2016 4
2017 5
2018 6
2019 5
2020 0
2021 0
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 90
Download as CSV

Caroline R. Mahoney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline R. Mahoney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Caroline R. Mahoney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline R. Mahoney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Caroline R. Mahoney is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences, with a specialization in education. Key subfields include education, political science and international relations, sociology and political science, biotechnology, and communication.

Mahoney's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Global Educational Policies and Reforms
  • Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
  • Education Systems and Policy
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges

Recent papers by Mahoney include:

  • School autonomy reform and social justice: a policy overview of Australian public education (1970s to present), 2021, The Australian Educational Researcher
  • School autonomy, marketisation and social justice: the plight of principals and schools, 2020, Journal of Educational Administration & History
  • The constitution of school autonomy in Australian public education: areas of paradox for social justice, 2020, International Journal of Leadership in Education
  • Affinity spaces and the situatedness of intercultural relations between international and domestic students in two Australian schools, 2022, Educational Review
  • Viability of Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp. on Slices of a German-Style Bologna Containing Blends of Organic Acid Salts During Storage at 4 or 12°C, 2022, Journal of Food Protection

Frequent co-authors working with Mahoney comprise:

  • Jill Blackmore
  • Katrina MacDonald
  • Amanda Keddie
  • Brad Gobby
  • Richard Niesche

Mahoney's publications have appeared in journals such as:

  • The Australian Educational Researcher
  • Journal of Educational Administration & History
  • International Journal of Leadership in Education
  • Educational Review
  • Journal of Food Protection

Best Publications

  • Effect of breakfast composition on cognitive processes in elementary school children.

    Caroline R. Mahoney;Holly A. Taylor;Robin B. Kanarek;Priscilla Samuel

  • When You and I Share Perspectives Pronouns Modulate Perspective Taking During Narrative Comprehension

    Tad T. Brunyé;Tali Ditman;Tali Ditman;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Jason S. Augustyn

  • Differential cognitive effects of energy drink ingredients: Caffeine, taurine, and glucose

    Grace E. Giles;Caroline R. Mahoney;Tad T. Brunyé;Aaron L. Gardony

  • Intake of caffeine from all sources and reasons for use by college students.

    Caroline R. Mahoney;Grace E. Giles;Bernadette P. Marriott;Daniel A. Judelson

  • Effects of four workplace lighting technologies on perception, cognition and affective state

    Breanne K. Hawes;Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;John M. Sullivan

  • Learning to relax: Evaluating four brief interventions for overcoming the negative emotions accompanying math anxiety

    Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Grace E. Giles;Grace E. Giles;David N. Rapp

  • Caffeine modulates attention network function

    Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Harris R. Lieberman;Holly A. Taylor

  • Tyrosine supplementation mitigates working memory decrements during cold exposure.

    Caroline R. Mahoney;John Castellani;F. Matthew Kramer;Andrew Young

  • Patterns of dietary supplement use among college students

    Harris R. Lieberman;Bernadette P. Marriott;Christianna Williams;Daniel A. Judelson

  • How Navigational Aids Impair Spatial Memory: Evidence for Divided Attention

    Aaron L. Gardony;Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Holly A. Taylor

  • Voluntary Dehydration and Cognitive Performance in Trained College Athletes

    Kristen E. D'Anci;Caroline R. Mahoney;Arjun Vibhakar;Jordan H. Kanter

  • Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: Comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms

    Grace E. Giles;Caroline R. Mahoney;Tad T. Brunyé;Holly A. Taylor

  • Simulating an enactment effect: Pronouns guide action simulation during narrative comprehension

    Tali Ditman;Tali Ditman;Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Holly A. Taylor

  • Acute caffeine consumption enhances the executive control of visual attention in habitual consumers

    Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Harris R. Lieberman;Grace E. Giles;Grace E. Giles

  • Keeping Your Eyes on the Prize Anger and Visual Attention to Threats and Rewards

    Brett Q. Ford;Maya Tamir;Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;William R. Shirer;William R. Shirer

  • Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension

    Tad T. Brunyé;Tali Ditman;Caroline R. Mahoney;Holly A. Taylor

  • Dietary tyrosine benefits cognitive and psychomotor performance during body cooling

    Catherine O'Brien;Caroline Mahoney;William J. Tharion;Ingrid V. Sils

  • North is up(hill): Route planning heuristics in real-world environments

    Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Aaron L. Gardony;Aaron L. Gardony;Holly A. Taylor

  • Body-specific representations of spatial location.

    Tad T. Brunyé;Aaron Gardony;Aaron Gardony;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Holly A. Taylor

  • Horizontal saccadic eye movements enhance the retrieval of landmark shape and location information.

    Tad T. Brunyé;Caroline R. Mahoney;Caroline R. Mahoney;Jason S. Augustyn;Holly A. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University
Holly A. Taylor
Holly A. Taylor Tufts University
Harris R. Lieberman
Harris R. Lieberman United States Department of the Army
Heather L. Urry
Heather L. Urry Tufts University
Amanda Holmes
Amanda Holmes University of Roehampton
David N. Rapp
David N. Rapp Northwestern University
Klaus Kessler
Klaus Kessler Aston University
Amitai Shenhav
Amitai Shenhav Brown University
Brett Q. Ford
Brett Q. Ford University of Toronto
Maya Tamir
Maya Tamir Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online degrees in the USA opens doors to a range of career options, from counseling and social work to human resources and research. Flexibility and accessibility make online programs especially appealing for working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

Cost is a major consideration for many prospective students. Finding affordable programs can significantly reduce the financial burden of pursuing a degree. For instance, students looking for the cheapest psychology degrees in Pennsylvania can discover reputable options with lower tuition. Those in other regions can find similar value, such as affordable psychology degrees in San Diego or most affordable psychology degree programs in Tampa.

If you prefer studying in the southern U.S., you may wish to explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in Tuscaloosa. By comparing programs in different locations, you can find the right balance between cost, flexibility, and accreditation to start your psychology career journey with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline R. Mahoney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles